Planeamiento estratégico y su impacto en la administración pública

Palabras clave: Planeamiento estratégico, administración pública, programación estratégica, gestión pública, revisión sistemática

Resumen

El planeamiento estratégico forma parte del proceso estratégico que hoy en día es llevado a cabo en la mayoría de las organizaciones públicas o privadas, se trata de la acción de proponer un objetivo y el camino que se debe seguir para lograrlo; este proceso contempla 3 etapas: Formulación, implementación y evaluación; la etapa en la que el Planeamiento estratégico se desarrolla es la Formulación, esta etapa es determinante, ya que se trata de plasmar lo que se va a implementar; y es este punto en el que casi todas las entidades de la administración pública fallan, sin una idea clara de lo que se quiere lograr para empezar, es poco lógico pensar que se alcanzará el objetivo propuesto. El objetivo de la investigación es determinar el impacto del planeamiento estratégico en la administración pública reportado en investigaciones empíricas relevantes. La revisión sistemática de literatura permitió identificar 48310 estudios de bibliotecas digitales como Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, Wiley Online Library, Taylor & Francis Online y EBSCOhost, de los cuales fueron seleccionados 60, estos ayudaron a responder las 4 preguntas de investigación planteadas. La RSL ha concluido en una tendencia en cuanto a las investigaciones sobre el Planeamiento estratégico y su efecto en la administración pública. La presente investigación contribuye a comprender las diferencias y similitudes de los estudios considerados, y se sugiere considerar una mayor cantidad de estudios que incluyan un mayor rango de años.

Biografía del autor/a

Alejandra Altamirano Taica

Licenciada en Negocios Internacionales, Estudiante de la Maestría en Gestión Pública en el Posgrado de la Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Perú. E-mail: maria.altamirano1@unmsm.edu.pe. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2224-0641

Javier Gamboa-Cruzado

Ingeniero de Sistemas, Doctor en Administración, Doctor en Ingeniería de Sistemas. Docente-Investigador del Posgrado de la Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Perú. E-mail: jgamboac@unmsm.edu.pe. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0461-4152

Augusto Hidalgo Sánchez

Administrador de Empresas, Doctor en Administración. Decano y Docente de la Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Perú. E-mail: ahidalgos@unmsm.edu.pe. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3123-610X

Citas

• Ahn, P. D., & Jacobs, K. (2019). Accountants’ incessant insecurity. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(8), 2421–2450. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2017-2815
• Al Hussaini, A. N. (2019). Organizational management through strategic planning and financial practices: An empirical assessment from business firms of Kuwait. Management Science Letters, 9(5), 713–726. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.2.001
• Altan, E. (2018). Perceptions of educational managers on reflective thinking, strategic thinking and entrepreneurship. Quality and Quantity, 52(s2), 1219–1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0685-x
• Angiola, N., Bianchi, P., & Damato, L. (2018). Performance management in public universities: overcoming bureaucracy. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(4), 736–753. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2017-0018
• Antošová, G., Šilhánková, V., & Wokoun, R. (2017). Strategic planning in two border regions in the Czech Republic-comparison of project impact in Zlín and South Bohemia regions. Administratie Si Management Public, (29), 128–140. https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/rampas/v2017y2017i29p128-140.html
• Avgerou, C., & Bonina, C. (2020). Ideologies implicated in IT innovation in government: A critical discourse analysis of Mexico’s international trade administration. Information Systems Journal, 30(1), 70–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12245
• Bianchi, C., Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2017). Applying a Dynamic Performance Management Framework to Wicked Issues: How Coproduction Helps to Transform Young People’s Services in Surrey County Council, UK. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(10), 833–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1280822
• Bice, S., Neely, K., & Einfeld, C. (2019). Next generation engagement: Setting a research agenda for community engagement in Australia’s infrastructure sector. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 78(2), 1467-8500.12381. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12381
• Biyela, A., Nzimakwe, T., Mthuli, S., & Khambule, I. (2018). Assessing the role of intergovernmental relations in strategic planning for economic development at local government level : a case study of Umkhanyakude District Municipality. Journal of Gender, Information and Development in Africa, 7(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.31920/2050-4284/2018/v7n2a11
• Bloom, C. (2017). Strategic Planning in the Public Sector. Journal of Planning Literature, 1(2), 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/088541228600100205
• Brorström, S. (2021). The sustainability shift: The role of calculative practices in strategy implementation. Financial Accountability & Management, 12289. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12289
• Capera Figueroa, J. J., & Galeano David, H. J. (2017). Las políticas públicas un campo de reflexión analítica entre la ciencia política y la administración pública administration. Telos, 19(2), 366–387. http://ojs.urbe.edu/index.php/telos/article/view/163
• Carra, M., Levi, N., Sgarbi, G., & Testoni, C. (2018). From community participation to co-design: “ Quartiere bene comune ” case study. Journal of Place Management and Development, 11(2), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-06-2017-0046
• Carrizo, D., & Moller, C. (2018). Estructuras metodológicas de revisiones sistemáticas de literatura en Ingeniería de Software: un estudio de mapeo sistemático. Ingeniare. Revista Chilena de Ingeniería, 26, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33052018000500045
• Cepeda, D. M., Sohail, M., & Ogunlowo, O. O. (2018). Understanding the critical success factors for delivery of megaprojects in Colombia. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law, 171(2), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.17.00005
• Cepiku, D., Giordano, F., & Savignon, A. B. (2018). Does strategy rhyme with austerity? Public Management Review, 20(3), 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1285116
• Chen, S.-H. (2017). Who Cares: Stakeholder Participation and the Use of Performance Information in Strategic Planning. Chinese Public Administration Review, 8(2), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.22140/cpar.v8i2.125
• Cifalinò, A., Mascia, D., Morandin, G., & Vendramini, E. (2021). Perceived goal importance, knowledge and accessibility of performance information: Testing mediation and moderation effects on medical professionals’ achievement of performance targets 1. Financial Accountability & Management, faam.12292. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12292
• Clerkin, B., & Quinn, M. (2019). Restricted Funding: Restricting Development? Voluntas, 30(6), 1348–1364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-00048-6
• da Silva, E. M., Calandrine, E. F., Santos, W. C. L. V. dos, Mendes, T. da S., Carvalho, F. I. C., & Nunes, S. F. (2021). Structuring Strategic Planning in a Public Organization: Application of the balanced Scorecard Method. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 8(1), 136–142. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.81.20
• Dahanayake, S. J. (2021). Enacting audit legitimacy: internal processes of VFM auditing in Victoria, Australia. Public Money and Management, 41(4), 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1732620
• Deslatte, A., & Stokan, E. (2020). Sustainability Synergies or Silos? The Opportunity Costs of Local Government Organizational Capabilities. Public Administration Review, 80(6), 1024–1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13237
• Desmidt, S., & Meyfroodt, K. (2021). What motivates politicians to use strategic plans as a decision-making tool? Insights from the theory of planned behaviour. Public Management Review, 23(3), 447–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1708438
• Dobriţoiu, R. (2017). General Issues on the Control Exercised by the Prefect upon the Legality of Acts Issued by Local Public Administration. Research and Science Today, 14(2), 45-50.
• El Ammar, C. (2019). The Impact of Strategic Planning on the Reform of Lebanese Public Administration. The Review of International Comparative Management, 20(3), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.24818/RMCI.2019.3.259
• El Ammar, C., & Profiroiu, C. M. (2020). Innovation in public administration reform: A strategic reform through npm, ICT, and e-governance. a comparative analysis between Lebanon and Romania. Administratie Si Management Public, (35), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.24818/35-05
• George, B., Desmidt, S., Cools, E., & Prinzie, A. (2018). Cognitive styles, user acceptance and commitment to strategic plans in public organizations: an empirical analysis. Public Management Review, 20(3), 340–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1285112
• Giambona, F., & Grassini, L. (2020). Tourism attractiveness in Italy: Regional empirical evidence using a pairwise comparisons modelling approach. International Journal of Tourism Research, 22(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2316
• Gieske, H., Duijn, M., & van Buuren, A. (2020). Ambidextrous practices in public service organizations: innovation and optimization tensions in Dutch water authorities. Public Management Review, 22(3), 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1588354
• Gökalp, E., Cakir, M. S., & Kougkoulos, I. (2021). Capacity management of migrant accommodation centers using approximate dynamic programming. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1907242
• Gutiérrez Silva, J. M., Romero Borré, J., Hernández Fernández, L., & Vega Jaramillo, F. Y. (2021). Planificación estratégica situacional: Un proceso metódico-práctico. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 26(94), 762–783. https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluzv26n94.17
• Guven-Uslu, P., Blaber, Z., & Adhikari, P. (2020). Boundary spanners and calculative practices. Financial Accountability & Management, 36(4), 439–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12266
• Hollman, A. K., Bickford, S. H., & Lear, J. L. (2018). Communication Processes of Information Technology Executives in Higher Education. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 30(2), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.2018040104
• Iasbech, P. A. B., & Lavarda, R. A. B. (2018). Strategy and practices. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(3), 347–371. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-12-2016-0207
• Jameel, A., Asif, M., & Hussain, A. (2019). Good Governance and Public Trust: Assessing the Mediating Effect of E-Government in Pakistan. Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 17(2), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.4335/17.2.299-320(2019)
• Janssen, M., Rana, N. P., Slade, E. L., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). Trustworthiness of digital government services: deriving a comprehensive theory through interpretive structural modelling. Public Management Review, 20(5), 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1305689
• Johansson, S., & Liljegren, A. (2021). Social service as glasshouses? On the use and consequences of the Open Comparison system in Swedish social services. Financial Accountability & Management, 37(3), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12277
• Kayuni, H. M. (2017). Strategic Planning in the Malawi Public Sector: Potential Tool for Progress or Regression? Public Organization Review, 17(3), 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-016-0345-3
• Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report, Ver. 2.3 EBSE Technical Report. EBSE.
• Krishnan, D., Islam, R., & Sarif, S. M. (2019). A hierarchical model to enhance financial and strategic performance of an oil and gas company in Malaysia. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 14(2), 482–503. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-01-2019-0001
• Kuzminov, I. F., Thurner, T., & Chulok, A. (2017). The technology foresight system of the Russian Federation: a systemic view. Foresight, 19(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-10-2016-0048
• Lee, D., McGuire, M., & Kim, J. H. (2018). Collaboration, strategic plans, and government performance: the case of efforts to reduce homelessness. Public Management Review, 20(3), 360–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1285113
• Mazurkiewicz, I. (2019). Management Competences of Management in Small and Medium Enterprise Projects. Scientific E-Journal of ManagementScienc, 5–19. www.revistanegotium.org.ve/núm.44
• Mirzaee, S. M. S., Mirfakhredini, S. H., Sadrabadi, A. N., & Sharifabadi, A. M. (2020). Compiling the strategies of alfa mining company and prioritizing them by WASPAS method. Logforum, 16(3), 447–463. https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2020.473
• Ngoye, B., Sierra, V., & Ysa, T. (2019). Assessing performance-use preferences through an institutional logics lens. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-12-2017-0344
• Niţă, A. M., & Goga, C. I. (2018). Strategic Management in the Local Public Administration Institutions. Case study: Application of the Balanced Scorecard instrument in the Zalău City Hall. Revista de Stiinte Politice, 59, 69–81. https://search.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/strategic-management-local-public-administration/docview/2117115230/se-2?accountid=17242
• Nkusi, A. C., Cunningham, J. A., Nyuur, R., & Pattinson, S. (2020). The role of the entrepreneurial university in building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in a post conflict economy: An exploratory study of Rwanda. Thunderbird International Business Review, 62(5), 549–563. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22165
• Noto, G., & Noto, L. (2019). Local Strategic Planning and Stakeholder Analysis: Suggesting a Dynamic Performance Management Approach. Public Organization Review, 19(3), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-018-0403-0
• Ongaro, E., & Ferlie, E. (2019). Exploring Strategy-Making in ‘Non-New Public Management’ Public Services Settings: The Case of European Union Agencies. Administrative Sciences, 9(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9010023
• Ormiston, J. (2019). Blending practice worlds: Impact assessment as a transdisciplinary practice. Business Ethics: A European Review, 28(4), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12230
• Parnell, D., May, A., Widdop, P., Cope, E., & Bailey, R. (2019). Management strategies of non-profit community sport facilities in an era of austerity. European Sport Management Quarterly, 19(3), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2018.1523944
• Pečarič, M. (2018). The Effects of Law Through Actions of Inspections. Central European Public Administration Review, 15(3–4), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.17573/ipar.2017.3-4.06
• Piervito Bianchi, N. A., & Damato, L. (2019). How to Improve Performance of Public Universities? A Strategic Management Approach. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3S2), 625–629. https://paq.spaef.org/article/1889/How-to-Improve-Performance-of-Public-Universities-A-Strategic-Management-Approach
• Ramírez Molina, R. I., Ríos-Pérez, J. D., Lay Raby, N. D., & Ramírez Molina, R. J. (2021). Estrategias empresariales y cadena de valor en mercados sostenibles: Una revisión teórica. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 27(Especial 4), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v27i.36999
• Reitano, V. (2018). An Open Systems Model of Local Government Forecasting. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(5), 476–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074017692876
• Robaj, A. (2018). Modernization Public Administration in the Republic of Uzbekistan. Russian Journal of Political Studies, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.13187/rjps.2018.1.20
• Sancino, A., & Hudson, L. (2020). Leadership in, of, and for smart cities–case studies from Europe, America, and Australia. Public Management Review, 22(5), 701–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1718189
• Savignon, A. B., Costumato, L., & Marchese, B. (2019). Performance budgeting in context: An analysis of italian central administrations. Administrative Sciences, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9040079
• Schachter, H. L. (2017). Organization Development and Management History: A Tale of Changing Seasons.
• Schleicher, D. J., Baumann, H. M., Sullivan, D. W., Levy, P. E., Hargrove, D. C., & Barros-Rivera, B. A. (2018). Putting the System Into Performance Management Systems: A Review and Agenda for Performance Management Research. Journal of Management, 44(6), 2209–2245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318755303
• Schubert, P., & Willems, J. (2021). In the name of the stakeholder: An assessment of representation surpluses and deficits by nonprofit leaders. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 31(4), 639–664. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21445
• Silva, R. J. R. da, Rodrigues, R. G., & Leal, C. T. P. (2019). Gamification in Management Education: A Systematic Literature Review. BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2019180103
• Skarica, M. (2020). Implementation of the Strategy for Public Administration Development in Croatia ( 2015-2020 ): a Mid-Term Evaluation. June 2018, 7–8.
• Spišáková, E. D., Gontkovičová, B., Majerníková, J., Spišák, E., & Pacana, A. (2019). Management of Research and Development Activities in the Context of Strategy Europe 2020. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.19.2.09
• Suchek, N., Fernandes, C. I., Kraus, S., Filser, M., & Sjögrén, H. (2021). Innovation and the circular economy: A systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3686–3702. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2834
• Tamošiūnas, A. (2018). Managing Selection of Wind Power Generation Technologies. Business: Theory and Practice, 19, 309–321. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2018.31
• Turner, S., D´Lima, D., Sheringham, J., Swart, N., Hudson, E., Morris, S., & Fulop, N. J. (2021). Evidence use as sociomaterial practice? A qualitative study of decision-making on introducing service innovations in health care. Public Management Review, 00(00), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1883098
• Urdaneta-Montiel, A. J., Borgucci-Garcia, E. V., & Jaramillo-Escobar, B. (2021). Crecimiento económico y la teoría de la eficiencia dinámica. Retos, 11(21), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n21.2021.06
• V. Andryushina, E., A. Panova, E., & N. Oparina, N. (2019). Conference and Round Table on Public Administration in Modern Russia and Hungary in the Framework of the MSU–NUPS Academic Week (October 9–10, 2018). Pro Publico Bono - Magyar Közigazgatás, 7(2), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.32575/ppb.2019.2.2
• Wolf, J., Nogueira, F., & Borges, M. (2021). A Collaborative Methodology for Local Strategic Planning: Insights from Four Plans in Portugal. Planning Practice and Research, 36(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2020.1755138
Publicado
2023-03-27
Cómo citar
Altamirano Taica, A., Gamboa-Cruzado, J., & Hidalgo Sánchez, A. (2023). Planeamiento estratégico y su impacto en la administración pública. Revista Venezolana De Gerencia, 28(102), 477-498. https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.28.102.3
Sección
En la mira: Políticas y gestión publica