Philosophy of Ecological Crisis and two Forms of Modern Dialectics. / La filosofía de la crisis ecológica y dos formas de la dialéctica moderna
Resumen
ABSTRACT
The rapid development of science and technology results in a change of human lifestyle. The main purpose of the work is to study the philosophy of ecological crisis and the forms of modern dialectics. The idea of "intersubjectivity" will function as our methodological basis. Continuation of Hegel’s ideas and essays of existentialists are related to dialectical processing of thought and technology. The authors note that the modern ecological crisis is connected to the destruction of free thinking. In order to understand the causes behind ecological crisis, it is necessary to distinguish between the philosophy of nature and transcendental nature-teaching.
RESUMEN
El rápido desarrollo de la ciencia y la tecnología da como resultado un cambio de estilo en la vida humana. El objetivo principal del trabajo es estudiar la filosofía de la crisis ecológica y las formas de la dialéctica moderna. La idea de "intersubjetividad" funcionará como nuestra base metodológica. La continuación de las ideas de Hegel y de los ensayos de los existencialistas se relaciona con el procesamiento dialéctico del pensamiento y de la tecnología. Los autores señalan que la crisis ecológica moderna está relacionada con la destrucción del libre pensamiento. Para entender las causas detrás de la crisis ecológica, es necesario distinguir entre la filosofía de la naturaleza y la enseñanza de la naturaleza trascendental.
Citas
Adorno, Th. (1964). The jargon of authenticity: German ideology. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.
Adorno, Th.W. (1957). Aspects of Hegelian philosophy. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.
Adorno, Th.W. (1963a). Interventions: nine critical models. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.
Adorno, Th.W. (1963b). Hegel: three studies. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.
Akhutin, A.V. (1989). Werner Heisenberg and philosophy. Nauka, Moscow.
Berdyaev, N.A. (1952). The existential dialectics of divine and human. YMCA-Press, Paris.
Fuchs, E.J.G. (1981). Fichte in conversations. Reports of the contemporaries. Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart.
Girndt, H. (1997). “I” as the first principle of the science of knowledge in the view of the Wissenschaftslehre of 1804. Rodopi, Amsterdam – Atlanta.
Grishay, E.V. (1999). Socio-philosophical aspects of the analysis of the ecological crisis. North-Caucasian State Technical University, Stavropol.
Hösle, V. (1991). Philosophy of the ecological crisis: Moscow lectures. Beck, München.
Hösle, V. (1992). The geniuses of modern philosophy. Nauka, Moscow.
Jaspers, K. (1958). On truth. Piper, München.
Kedrov, B.M., Ovchinnikov, N.F. (Eds.). (1975). Methodological principles of physics. Nauka, Moscow.
Kierkegaard, S. (1961). On the concept of irony with continual reference to Socrates. Köln, Dusseldorf.
Lauth, R. (1981). The structure of time in consciousness. Meiner, Hamburg.
Lauth, R. (1984). The transcendental natural philosophy of Fichte following the principles of science. Meiner, Hamburg.
Lukjanow, A.V. (2007). In search of a new theory of the Absolute. The idea of synthesis in the later systems of Fichte and Schelling, Fichte Studies. 4: pp. 117-125.
Malinin, V.A. (1989). Hehel’s dialectics and the two forms of modern dialectics, Public Thought: Research and Publications. 1: pp. 165-178.
Schelling, Fr.W.J. (1977). The philosophy of Revelation 1841/42. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.
