Internet Regulation: Multidisciplinary Perspective. / Regulación de la red: perspectiva multidisciplinar.

  • David LÓPEZ JIMÉNEZ EAE Business School, Spain
  • Eduardo Carlos DITTMAR EAE Business School, Spain
  • Jenny Patricia VARGAS PORTILLO ESIC Business & Marketing School, Spain




The internet is probably the greatest technological revolution in recent history. The internet has modified human relations and a significant number of activities, including commercial transactions, among which e-commerce and advertising play a very important role. Power structures, including the governments of different states, have established various forms of regulation. Any unregulated global means of communication can pose a significant risk to any nation. Cyberspace in general and e-commerce in particular present various regulatory options.



La red es probablemente la mayor revolución tecnológica de la historia reciente. Internet ha modificado las relaciones humanas y un importante número de actividades como, entre otras, las transacciones comerciales en las que ocupa un lugar muy relevante el comercio electrónico y la publicidad. Las estructuras de poder, entre las que se encuentran los gobiernos de los distintos Estados del mundo, han establecido diversas formas de regulación. Todo medio global de comunicación no controlado puede erigirse en un potencial riesgo notable para cualquier nación. El ciberespacio, con carácter general, y el comercio electrónico en particular admiten diversas fórmulas reguladoras.


ANANNY, M. and CRAWFORD, K. (2018). “Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability”. New Media & Society, 20(3), pp. 973–989.

ARREDONDO, C. R. and ALFARO TANCO, J. A. (2019). “The relationship between SCM and business strategy. A Delphi study in Latin America”. Harvard Deusto Business Research, 8(1), pp. 62-80.

BODDEWYN, J. J. (1992). Global Perspectives on Advertising Self-Regulation: Principles and Practices in Thirty-eight Countries. Connecticut: Quórum Books.

BROUSSEAU, E. and MARZOUKI, M. (2012). “Internet governance: old issues, new framings, uncertain implications”. In E. Brousseau, M. Marzouki and C. Méadel (Eds.), Governance, Regulations and Powers on the Internet, pp. 368–397. New York: Cambridge University Press.

CALVO CALVO, A. A. (2019). “Technological change, opening and internationalization of Spanish telecommunications. The transition to the third generation of mobile telephony”. Harvard Deusto Business Research, 8(1), pp. 3-30.

CITRON, D. K. (2009). “Cyber civil rights”. Boston University Law Review, 89, pp. 61–126.

CITRON, D. K. and Wittes, B. (2017). “The internet will not break: Denying bad samaritans sec. 230 immunity”. Fordham Law Review, 86(2), pp. 401–423.

DENARDIS, L. (2012). “Hidden levers of Internet control”. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), pp. 720–738.

DENARDIS, L. (2014). The Global War for Internet Governance. New Haven: Yale University Press.

DÍAZ-PERDOMO, Y., ÁLVAREZ-GONZÁLEZ, L. I and SANZO-PÉREZ, M. J. (2020). “Non-profit organization-business value co-creation: conceptualization and scale development”. Harvard Deusto Business Research, 9(1), pp. 3-19.

DOMÍNGUEZ-ESCRIG, E., MALLÉN BROCH, F. F., LAPIEDRA ALCAMÍ, R. and CHIVA GÓMEZ, R. (2020). “How do servant leaders promote radical innovation? The role of organizational learning capability”. Harvard Deusto Business Research, 9(1), pp. 53-68.

EDWARDS, L. and VEALE, M. (2017). “Slave to the algorithm: Why a right to an explanation is probably not the remedy you are looking for”. Duke Law & Technology Review, 16, pp. 18–84.

EPSTEIN, D. (2013). “The making of institutions of information governance: the case of the Internet Governance Forum”. Journal of Information Technology, 28(2), pp. 137–149.

FEICK, J. and WERLE, R. (2010). “Regulation of cyberspace”. In R. Baldwin, M. Cave and M. Lodge (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Regulation, pp. 523–547. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

FLYVERBOM, M. (2010). “Hybrid networks and the global politics of the digital revolution – A practice-oriented, relational and agnostic approach”. Global Networks, 10(3), pp. 424–442.

JIMENEZ, D., ANTON, A. J. and CRICHLOW, J. (2017). “Self-Regulation of electronic Commerce: Issues in the context of chilean law”. Revista Chilena de Derecho, 44 (2), pp. 347-369.

KHAN, L. M. (2017). “Amazon’s antitrust paradox”. Yale Law Journal, 126(3), pp. 712–805.

LEVI-FAUR, D. (2011). “Regulation and regulatory governance”. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), Handbook on the Politics of Regulation, pp. 3–21. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

LÓPEZ JIMÉNEZ, D. and DITTMAR, E. C. (2018). “Consumer protection from abuses in commercial communications sent via radiofrequency”. Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicacoes, 10(1), pp. 37-60.

LÓPEZ JIMÉNEZ, D., DITTMAR, E. C. and VARGAS PORTILLO, J. P. (2019). “Autorregulación en el diseño de sitios web: prácticas legales y empresariales”. Opción, 35(extra 25), pp. 1835-1873.

LÓPEZ JIMÉNEZ, D., DITTMAR, E. C. and VARGAS PORTILLO, J. P. (2020). “Self-regulation of Sexist Digital Advertising: From Ethics to Law”. Journal of Business Ethics.

LÓPEZ JIMÉNEZ, D. and REDCHUK, A. (2015). “Social trends in e-commerce in Latin America: About the companies adhered to codes of good practice”. Opción, 31(78), pp. 65-79.

LÓPEZ JIMÉNEZ, D., REDCHUK A., DITTMAR, E. C. and VARGAS PORTILLO J. P. (2013). “Internet privacy seals: User perception in Spain”. RISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao, 12, pp. 49-63.

LÓPEZ JIMÉNEZ, D., VARGAS PORTILLO, J. P. and DITTMAR, E. C. (2020). “Safeguarding privacy in social networks”. Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicacoes, 12(1), pp. 58-76.

MARTÍN-ROMO ROMERO, S. and DE PABLOS HEREDERO, C. (2017). “Contribution of Privacy by Design”. Harvard Deusto Business Research, 6(3), pp. 176-191.

MARTÍN-ROMO ROMERO, S. and DE PABLOS HEREDERO, C. (2018). “Data protection by design: Organizational integration”. Harvard Deusto Business Research, 7(2), pp. 60-71.

MUSIANI, F. (2014). “Practice, plurality, performativity, and plumbing: internet governance research meets science and technology studies”. Science, Technology & Human Values, 40(2), pp. 272–286.

NASH, V., BRIGHT, J., MARGETTS, H. and LEHDONVIRTA, V. (2017). “Public policy in the platform society”. Policy & Internet, 9(4), pp. 368–373.

NOOREN, P., VAN GORP, N., VAN EIJK, N. and FATHAIGH, R. O. (2018). “Should we regulate digital platforms? A new framework for Evaluating policy options”. Policy & Internet, 10(3), pp. 264–301.

OMER, C. (2014). “Intermediary liability for harmful speech: Lessons from abroad notes”. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 28(1), pp. 289–324.

PINEDA-ALBALADEJO, J. M., MOYA-FAZ, F. J. and LÓPEZ PUGA, J. (2017). “Training in Values as an Incubator for Sustainability Attitudes”. Harvard Deusto Business Research, 6(2), pp. 133-140.

PLANTIN, J. C., LAGOZE, C., EDWARDS, P. N., and SANDVIG, C. (2018). “Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook”. New Media & Society, 20(1), pp. 293–310.

SAGASTI, F. (2019). “Renewing Strategic Planning and Management”. Harvard Deusto Business Research, 8(3), pp. 208-218.

SÁNCHEZ TORRES, J. A., RIVERA GONZÁLEZ, J. A. and DE MAESTRICH JORBA L. (2018). “What Kind of E-Mail Information Is More Effective in Communicating with the Client? Application of Game Theory”. Harvard Deusto Business Research, 7(1), pp. 2-18.

SEVERINO GONZÁLEZ, P., VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, J. V., CHAMALI DUARTE, N., VERGARA PIÑA, G. and GONZÁLEZ SOTO, N. (2019). “Social responsibility of university student and institutional educational policies. Recognizing the commitments to society”. Opción, 35(90), pp. 1171-1197.

TANGANELLI, D. (2017). “Levels of Internationalization of Multinational Spanish Firms: The Role of the Amount of Committed Equity and the Managerial Attitudes toward Foreignness”. Harvard Deusto Business Research, 6(3), pp. 164-175.

VAN EETEN, M. J. and MUELLER, M. (2013). “Where is the governance in Internet governance?” New Media & Society, 15(5), pp. 720–736.

VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, J. V. (2013). “El lugar del saber en la formación universitaria. Bioética, currículo y gestión del conocimiento para el desarrollo humano”. Opción, 29(72), pp. 9-19.

VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, J. V. (2015). “Tecnociencia, derecho y sociedad. Pilares de una modernidad inacabada”. Opción, 31(76), pp. 5-12.

VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, J. V. (2016). “Bioética y gobernanza universitaria: Un nuevo paradigma para la educación de futuro”. Opción, 32(8), pp. 11-13.

VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, J. V. (2018). “Politics as a requirement. On the concept of human rights and the right to an autobiography as an ethical category”. Opción, 34(85-2), pp. 8-17.

VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, J. V., and GANGA-CONTRERAS, F. A. (2018). “Tecnoempresa y Tecnocimiento: Una Perspectiva desde la Bioética Empresarial”. Fronteiras, 7(3), pp. 214-230.

VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, J. V., and RAMÍREZ MOLINA, R. I. 2018. “El derecho a la autobiografía: dimensión ius-filosófica desde la perspectiva de H. Arendt y P. Ricoeur”. Opción, 34(extra 18), pp. 20-50.

ZIEWITZ, M. and PENTZOLD, C. (2014). “In search of internet governance: performing order in digitally networked environments”. New Media & Society, 16(2), pp. 306–322.

Cómo citar
LÓPEZ JIMÉNEZ, D., DITTMAR, E. C., & VARGAS PORTILLO, J. P. (2020). Internet Regulation: Multidisciplinary Perspective. / Regulación de la red: perspectiva multidisciplinar. Utopía Y Praxis Latinoamericana, 25, 447-460. Recuperado a partir de