Reason And Usage Of The Wise In Family Dispute Resolution Proceedings With The Implementation Of Judicial Decisions

• S. MAHJOOB University of Isfahan http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4347-1377
• R. MAZAHERI KUHANSETANI University of Isfahan http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8137-5909
• M.S. TABATABAEI University of Isfahan
• A. FASIHIZADEH University of Isfahan

Palabras clave: Judiciary, Legal System, Prosecutors, Reason. Fiscales, Poder Judicial, Razón, Sistema Legal.

Resumen

ABSTRACT

 

In recent years, the use of reason has been the subject of much attention by legal writers and prosecutors. The use of this argument in the family law system has led to many ambiguities to the extent that the doctrine and the judiciary have not been adequately addressed. Therefore, as an essential part of the legal system and the proper quality of citing it as a judicial proof by the prosecutors, it is of great importance that the present article discusses the position of this argument and its analysis. Judiciary is based on an Osule feghh.

RESUMEN

 

En los últimos años, el uso de la razón ha sido objeto de mucha atención por parte de escritores legales y fiscales. El uso de este argumento en el sistema de derecho de familia ha generado muchas ambigüedades en la medida en que la doctrina y el poder judicial no se han abordado adecuadamente. Por lo tanto, como parte esencial del sistema legal y la calidad adecuada de citarlo como prueba judicial por parte de los fiscales, es de gran importancia que el presente artículo discuta la posición de este argumento y su análisis. El poder judicial se basa en un Osule feghh.

Citas

BINGHAM, LB (2004). Employment dispute resolution: The case for mediation. Conflict Resol. Q., 22, p.145.

CROWNE, CH (2001). The Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 1998: Implementing a new paradigm of justice. NYUL Rev., 76, p.1768.

GOLANN, D (1989). Making Alternative Dispute Resolution Mandatory: The Constitutional Issues. Or. L. Rev., 68, p.487.

GURULE, J, PAUST, JJ, BASSIOUNI, MC, SCHARF, MP, SADAT, L, & ZAGARIS, B (1996). International Criminal Law: Cases and Materials. 0890898944.

HENSLER, DR (2003). Our courts, ourselves: how the alternative dispute resolution movement is re-shaping our legal system. Penn St. L. Rev., 108, p.165.

KERŠULIENE, V, ZAVADSKAS, EK, & TURSKIS, Z (2010). “Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA)”, in: Journal of business economics and management, 11(2), pp.243-258.

LIND, EA, KULIK, CT, AMBROSE, M, & DE VERA PARK, MV (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly, pp.224-251.

MABEY, RR, TABB, CJ, & DIZENGOFF, IS (1994). Expanding the Reach of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Bankruptcy: The Legal and Practical Bases for the Use of Mediation and the Other Forms of ADR. SCL Rev., 46, p.1259.

MENKEL-MEADOW, C (1997). Ethics in Alternative Dispute Resolution: New Issues, No Answers from the Adversary Conception of Lawyers' Responsibilities. S. Tex. L. Rev., 38, p.407.

PHILLIPS, BA, & PIAZZA, AC (1982). The Role of Mediation in Public Interest Disputes. Hastings LJ, 34, p.1231.

POSNER, RA (1986). The summary jury trial and other methods of alternative dispute resolution: Some cautionary observations. The University of Chicago law review, 53(2), pp.366-393.

ROZDEICZER, L, & DE LA CAMPA, AA (2006). Alternative Dispute Resolution Manual: Implementing Commercial Mediation. The World Bank Group.–2006.–November.–Р, 166.