Prolegomenon to the ontology of neoclassical philosophy

Palabras clave: Dialectics, Metaphysics, Ontology, Philosophy.

Resumen

ABSTRACT

 

The situation into which modern philosophy falls today is fundamentally different. Conceptual changes and shifts in modern philosophical science concern not only the revision of the reality but also the explanation of new categories and principles. This paper aims to reveal the main content, reflective models and the potential of neoclassical philosophy in the context of the formation of a new ontology. For the objective to be achieved, the following tasks must be performed: to determine the modern type of determinism, to identify the fundamental principle of neoclassical philosophy, and also to determine its main category.

 

RESUMEN

 

La situación en la que cae la filosofía moderna hoy es fundamentalmente diferente. Los cambios sociales y conceptuales en la ciencia filosófica moderna se refieren no solo a la revisión de la realidad, sino también a la explicación de nuevas categorías y principios. Este artículo tiene como objetivo revelar el contenido principal de los modelos reflexivos y el potencial de la filosofía neoclásica en el contexto de la formación de una nueva ontología. Para lograr el objetivo, se deben realizar las siguientes tareas: determinar el tipo moderno de determinismo e identificar el principio fundamental de la filosofía neoclásica para determinar su categoría principal.

 

Biografía del autor/a

A.S. KRASNOV, Kazan Federal University
Anton Sergeevich Krasnov. He was born on 06/21/1987. In 2009-2012 he got a postgraduate education degree from Kazan State University. V. I. Ulyanov-Lenin, Faculty of Philosophy. In 2004-2009 graduated higher education at Institute of Economics, Management, and Law, Faculty of Law. Knowledge of languages: German (Fluency), Italian (Elementary), English (Fluency). He is an Associate Professor (Associate Professor) at KFU, Institute of Social and Philosophical Sciences and Mass Communications, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, and Department of General Philosophy (main employee).
O.O. VOLCHKOVA, Kazan Federal University

Olga Olegovna Volchkova. Was born on 04/24/1993. In 2015-2017 was graduated higher education at Kazan Federal University, Institute of Social and Philosophical Sciences and Mass Communications, Philosophy. Studied Master’s degree in 2011-2015 at Kazan Federal University, Institute of Social and Philosophical Sciences and Mass Communications, Political Science. He is a bachelor and Assistant for BS at KFU, Institute of Social and Philosophical Sciences and Mass Communications, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Department of Religious Studies (main employee).

Citas

BARROW, JD (2007). “Anthropic Definitions”. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society. p. 146.

CHARDIN, P (1965). Teilhard de, Human Phenomenon. Foreword by Roger Garaudy; Translated from French by N. A. Sadovsky. Progress. p.296.

DEMITRIEVSKAYA, IV (1994). “Ontological Models of the World and the Problem of the Reality of Consciousness”. The Philosophy of Consciousness of the 20th Century: Problems and Solutions.

Collected Scientific Papers of the Ivanovo State University. Ivanovo, p. 5-18.

EKSMO, M (2015). Aristotle. Metaphysics. p. 448.

HEGEL, GVF (1913). Phenomenology of the Spirit. translated under the editorship of E. Radlov. St. Petersburg. p. 376.

HEGEL, GVF (2007). The Philosophy of Law. The World of Books. p. 464.

HEIDE, L. “Autonomy and Unhappy Consciousness. God is Dead”, (Electronic resource) Retrieved from http://www.ruthenia.ru/logos/number/1999_09/1999_9_01.htm

KRASNOV, AS (2017). The essence of living in the context of neo-classical understanding. Vol.28, P.734-738.

LOUX, MJ, & CRISP, TM (2017). Metaphysics: A contemporary introduction. Routledge

.

MANDELBROT, B (2002). Fractal Geometry of Nature. Institute for Computer Research. p. 656.

MANDELBROT, B (2005). (Dis) obedient Markets: A Fractal Revolution in Finance.“Williams”. p. 400.

MENCHIKOV, GP (2014). “The Problem of Determinism and Its Solutions: Three Types of Determinism, Fractal Determinism”. Part I. Bulletin of the KSUC. Issue 1. pp.10-17.

MENCHIKOV, GP, & KRASNOV, AS (2016). “Anthropic principle and" observer of neoclassical type" in contemporary social theory”. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 20, pp.14-16.

MENCHIKOV, GP &, KRASNOV, AS (2016). “Anthropic principle and «observer of neoclassical type « in contemporary social theory”. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications, and Conflict. Vol.20, Is.SpecialIssue3. P.14-19.

MACGREGOR, D (2015). “The Communist Ideal in Hegel and Marx (RLE Marxism)”. Routledge.

O’BOYLE, BRIAN, & MCDONOUGH, T (2015). The state of nature and natural states: Ideology and formalism in the critique of neoclassical economics. In What is Neoclassical Economics? pp. 214-234. Routledge.

WHEELER, JA (1977). Genesis and Observership, Foundational Problems in the Special Sciences. Dordrecht, Р. 27 – 43.

Publicado
2019-12-08
Cómo citar
KRASNOV, A., & VOLCHKOVA, O. (2019). Prolegomenon to the ontology of neoclassical philosophy. Utopía Y Praxis Latinoamericana, 24(1), 57-64. Recuperado a partir de https://www.produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/utopia/article/view/29972
Número
Vol. 24 (2019): Extra 5 [Interlocuciones]
Sección
Artículos