New Subjectness in the Conditions of Sociotechnical Space

Keywords: Ontology, artificial intelligence, epistemology, cognition, new subjectness, consciousness, subject, object, Actor-Network Theory

Abstract

The paper investigates the emergence of the phenomenon of new subjectness that arises from the integration of artificial and natural fields in contemporary socio-technical reality. It aims to challenge the subject-object dichotomy established by Modern philosophy tradition. To support this goal, the paper draws on the philosophical views of the proponents of Object-Oriented Ontology (Manuel DeLanda, Graham Harman) and Actor-Network theory (Bruno Latour, John Law). These contemporary philosophers substantiate the idea of distributed hybrid subjectness as the result of multiple network interactions, which can be interpreted using John Law's "method assemblage". This method disregards the attitudes of classical metaphysics and leads to the conclusion that new subjectivity arises from chaotic reality and manifests through the continuous formation and reformation of "bundles of relations". In those relations, it is impossible to differentiate between subject and object, as these roles roles are mobile and volatile.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nikolaeva Evgeniya, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University. Russia.

Professor, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University. Russia.

Kamaleeva Aisylu, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University. Russia.

PhD student, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University. Russia.

Nikolaev Mikhail, Kazan Federal State University, Russian Federation.

Senior Lecturer, Department of conflictology, Kazan Federal State University, 18, Kremlyovskaya str., Kazan, 420008, Russian Federation.

References

Kuznetsov, А. (2010). Mediatsii i bytie v filosofii Bruno Latura [Mediation and Being in the Philosophy of Bruno Latour]. In V.V. Savchuk M.A. Stepanov (Eds.), Mediafilosofiia [Mediaphilosophy] (pp. 244-256). Saint Petersburg: SPbFO Publisher.

Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (2015). Voina i mir mikrobov. S prilozheniem "Nesvodimogo" [Pasteur. The War and the World of Microbes, with an Appendix of the "Irreducible"]. Saint Petersburg: European University Publisher.

Sivokon', A. (2015). Aktorno-setevoi podkhod: istoki i perspektivy v sotsial'no-filosofskom diskurse [The Actor-Network Approach: Origins and Perspectives in Social-Philosophical Discourse]. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta [Proceedings of Kazan University], 1, 162-169.

Shahid, F. (2022). Google Has Suspended the Engineer Who Said AI Chatbot Has Developed Feelings. WCCFTECH. https://wccf.tech/19a03

Likhanova, Е. (2022). OpenAI: sozdatel' Chat GPT i potentsial'naia "ugroza dlia chelovechestva" [Open AI: creator of Chat GPT and a potential "threat to humanity"]. RB.RU. https://rb.ru/story/openai-what-to-know/

Volodenkov, S.V., & Fedorchenko, S.N. (2022). The peculiarities of the subjectness phenomenon in the context of contemporary technological transformations. Polis. Political Studies, 5, 40-55. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/ jpps/2022.05.04

Searle, J. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and brain sciences. 3, (3), 417-424. Ryle, G. (2009). The Concept of Mind. London, New York: Routledge; Taylor and Francis Group. DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x00005756

Dennett, D.C. (1991). Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. DOI: 10.2307/2185913

Law, J. (2004). After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London, New York: Routledge; Taylor and Francis Group.
Published
2023-09-03
How to Cite
Evgeniya, N., Aisylu, K., & Mikhail, N. (2023). New Subjectness in the Conditions of Sociotechnical Space. Journal of the University of Zulia , 14(41), 584-592. https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.41.33