Transformación de procesos y políticas editoriales de las revistas científicas frente al uso de inteligencia artificial
Palabras clave:
Políticas editoriales, etnografía digital, brecha tecnológica, casas editoriales, algoritmos generativos
Resumen
El desarrollo de herramientas de inteligencia artificial, tanto generativas como no generativas, ha transformado los procesos editoriales de las revistas científicas, siendo utilizadas por autores y comités editoriales para optimizar tareas y reducir tiempos en el flujo de publicación. Esta investigación tiene como objetivo analizar la evolución de los procesos y políticas editoriales vinculados al uso de herramientas de inteligencia artificial entre 2022 y el presente, identificando los principales cambios éticos, operativos y normativos implementados por reconocidas casas editoriales internacionales. Se empleó un diseño metodológico mixto, de carácter descriptivo y exploratorio, estructurado en tres fases: Revisión sistemática de literatura, etnografía digital de las políticas editoriales que integran inteligencia artificial y el mapeo de avances en su aplicación. Los resultados evidencian que la etapa de evaluación preliminar es la que más frecuentemente utiliza herramientas de inteligencia artificial; mientras que, en la revisión por pares, su uso permanece restringido. Entre las principales limitaciones destacan la falta de estandarización en las políticas, las barreras técnicas y la escasa capacitación. Asimismo, se observó que muchas revistas carecen de una declaración explícita sobre el uso de herramientas de inteligencia artificial y no existe consenso respecto al lugar adecuado para su divulgación.
Descargas
La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.
Citas
Acosta, S. F., y Finol, M. R. (2024). Inteligencia artificial como mecanismo para mejorar la gestión educativa universitaria. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), XXX(3), 583-597. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v30i3.42697
Agrawal, A., Gans, J. S., y Goldfarb, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence adoption and system-wide change. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 33(2), 327-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12521
Alves, L., Carvalho, M., y Dias, L. (2022). Transparência e processo editorial: Como é o trabalho das Editoras-chefes? Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 38(6), e00089822. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311xpt089822
Aries Systems Corporation (2023). Editorial Manager and ProduXion Manager workflow automation. Aries Systems Corporation. https://www.ariessys.com
Association for Psychological Science (December, 2023). APS editorial policies. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/publications/aps-editorial-policies
Banh, L., y Strobel, G. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence. Electronic Markets, 33(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00680-1
BMJ Publishing Group (2024). BMJ editorial policies on artificial intelligence and integrity in research. BMJ Publishing Group. https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors
Bustamante-Limones, A., Rodriguez-Borges, C., y Pérez-Rodríguez, J. A. (2024). Evaluación del uso de gemelos digitales en los sistemas de producción. AiBi Revista de Investigación, Administración e Ingeniería, 12(3), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.15649/2346030X.4382
Candal-Pedreira, C., Rey-Brandariz, J., Varela-Lema, L., Pérez-Ríos, M., y Ruano-Ravina, A. (2023). Los desafíos de la revisión por pares: Cómo garantizar la calidad y transparencia del proceso editorial de las revistas científicas. Anales de Pediatría, 99(1), 54-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpedi.2023.05.017
Cárdenas-Oliveros, J. A., Rodríguez-Borges, C. G., Pérez-Rodríguez, J. A., y Valencia-Zambrano, X. H. (2022). Desarrollo del pensamiento crítico: Metodología para fomentar el aprendizaje en ingeniería. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), XXVIII(4), 512-530. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v28i4.39145
Carobene, A., Padoan, A., Cabitza, F., Banfi, G., y Plebani, M. (2024). Rising adoption of artificial intelligence in scientific publishing: Evaluating the role, risks, and ethical implications in paper drafting and review process. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 62(5), 835-843. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-1136
Chang, H., y Kong, H.-J. (2018). A new online journal management system. Healthcare Informatics Research, 24(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2018.24.1.1
Comisión Europea (2025). Quienes somos. Comisión Europea. https://commission.europa.eu/index_es
Committee on Publication Ethics – COPE (2023). Position statement on artificial intelligence tools in research publication. Committee on Publication Ethics. https://doi.org/10.24318/cCVRZBms
Cress, U., y Kimmerle, J. (2023). Co-constructing knowledge with generative AI tools: Reflections from a CSCL perspective. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(4), 607-614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09409-w
Delli, A., y D’Auria, V. (2021). Digital Ethnography: A systematic literature review. Italian Sociological Review, 11(4S), 243-267. https://doi.org/10.13136/isr.v11i4S.434
Díaz, D. (2024). Herramientas para detectar el Plagio a la Inteligencia Artificial: ¿Cuán útiles son? Revista CoGnosis, 9(2), 144-150.
Doskaliuk, B., Zimba, O., Yessirkepov, M., Klishch, I., y Yatsyshyn, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence in peer review: Enhancing efficiency while preserving integrity. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 40(7), e92. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e92
Elkhatat, A. M., Elsaid, K., y Almeer, S. (2023). Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00140-5
Elsevier (2024). Generative AI policies for journals. Elsevier. https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/generative-ai-policies-for-journals
Farber, S. (2024). Enhancing peer review efficiency: A mixed-methods analysis of artificial intelligence-assisted reviewer selection across academic disciplines. Learned Publishing, 37(4), e1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1638
Fiorillo, L., y Mehta, V. (2024). Accelerating editorial processes in scientific journals: Leveraging AI for rapid manuscript review. Oral Oncology Reports, 10, 100511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oor.2024.100511
Forberg, P., y Schilt, K. (2023). What is ethnographic about digital ethnography? A sociological perspective. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1156776. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1156776
Fyfe, A., Squazzoni, F., Torny, D., y Dondio, P. (2019). Managing the growth of peer review at the Royal Society journals, 1865–1965. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 45(3), 405-429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919862868
Ganjavi, C., Eppler, M. B., Pekcan, A., Biedermann, B., Abreu, A., Collins, G. S., Gill, I. S., y Cacciamani, G. E. (2024). Publishers’ and journals’ instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: Bibliometric analysis. BMJ, 384, e077192. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-077192
Gatrell, C., Muzio, D., Post, C., y Wickert, C. (2024). Here, there and everywhere: On the responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI) in management research and the peer-review process. Journal of Management Studies, 61(3), 739-751. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13045
Goretti, L., Küsters, A., Morgana, S., y Sharma, A. (2024). Challenges and opportunities of using generative AI for research: Opening the discussion. The International Spectator, 60(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2024.2435176
Hanson, M. A., Gómez, P., Crosetto, P., y Brockington, D. (2023). The strain on scientific publishing. Quantitative Science Studies, 5(4), 823-843. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00327
Hernández-León, N., y Rodríguez-Conde, M.-J. (2024a). Cómo nos puede ayudar la inteligencia artificial a hacer un análisis sistemático de literatura científica (SLR): Ejemplo práctico sobre “la inteligencia artificial aplicada a la educación”. En I. Cabero (Coord.), Perspectivas contemporáneas en educación: Innovación, investigación y transformación (pp. 567-585). Dykinson.
Hernández-León, N., y Rodríguez-Conde, M.-J. (2024b). Inteligencia artificial aplicada a la educación y la evaluación educativa en la universidad: Introducción de sistemas de tutorización inteligentes, sistemas de reconocimiento y otras tendencias futuras. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 24(78). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.594651
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors - ICMJE (2024). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/
JAMA Network (2025). Home. JAMA Network. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama
Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (2025). Editorial policies. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. https://www.jiem.org/index.php/jiem/about/editorialPolicies
Kaebnick, G. E., Magnus, D. C., Kao, A., Hosseini, M., Resnik, D., Dubljević, V., Rentmeester, C., Gordijn, B., y Cherry, M. J. (2023). Editors’ statement on the responsible use of generative AI technologies in scholarly journal publishing. Hastings Center Report, 53(5), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1507
Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., y Li, N. (2025). Exploring students’ perspectives on generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1265-1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7
Kousha, K., y Thelwall, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review. Learned Publishing, 37(1), 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1570
Leung, T. I., De Azevedo, T., Mavragani, A., y Eysenbach, G. (2023). Best practices for using AI tools as an author, peer reviewer, or editor. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e51584. https://doi.org/10.2196/51584
Liebrenz, M., Schleifer, R., Buadze, A., Bhugra, D., y Smith, A. (2023). Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: Ethical challenges for medical publishing. The Lancet Digital Health, 5(3), e105-e106. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00019-5
Ling, X., y Yan, S. (2023). Let’s be fair: What about an AI editor? Accountability in Research, 31(8), 1253-1254. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2223997
Lund, B. D., y Naheem, K. T. (2024). Can ChatGPT be an author? A study of artificial intelligence authorship policies in top academic journals. Learned Publishing, 37(1), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1582
Mendoza, W. S., Díaz-Guecha, L. Y., Numa-Sanjuán, N., y Herrera, S. (2025). Inteligencia Artificial Generativa y sus consideraciones éticas en el derecho: Una valoración exploratoria sobre la práctica. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), XXXI(4), 206-222. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v31i4.44848
Moradzadeh, M., Sedghi, S., y Panahi, S. (2022). Towards a new paradigm for ‘journal quality’ criteria: A scoping review. Scientometrics, 128, 279-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04520-5
Morán-Ortega, S.-A., Ruiz-Tirado, S.-G., Simental-López, L.-M., y Tirado-López, A.-B. (2024). Barreras de la inteligencia artificial generativa en estudiantes de educación superior: Percepción docente. Revista de Investigación en Tecnologías de la Información, 12(25), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.36825/riti.12.25.003
Nature Portfolio (2023). Editorial policies and peer review process. Nature Portfolio. https://www.nature.com/nature-portfolio
Nuijten, M. B., y Wicherts, J. M. (2024). Implementing statcheck during peer review is related to a steep decline in statistical-reporting inconsistencies. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241258945
Ooi, K.-B., Tan, G. W.-H., Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Capatina, A., Chakraborty, A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Huang, T.-L., Kar, A. K., Lee, V.-H., Loh, X.-M., Micu, A., Mikalef, P., Mogaji, E., Pandey, N., Raman, R., Rana, N. P., Sarker, P., Sharma, A., … Wong, L.-W. (2025). The potential of generative artificial intelligence across disciplines: Perspectives and future directions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 65(1), 76-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2023.2261010
Osasona, F., Amoo, O. O., Atadoga, A., Abrahams, T. O., Farayola, O. A., y Ayinla, B. S. (2024). Reviewing the ethical implications of AI in decision making processes. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(2), 322-335. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i2.773
Pezzullo, A. M., y Boccia, S. (2024). Growth and challenges in biomedical scientific publishing. European Journal of Public Health, 34(S_3), ckae144.677. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.677
Pividori, M., y Greene, C. S. (2023). A publishing infrastructure for AI-assisted academic authoring [Preprint]. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.21.525030
PLoS ONE (2023). Peer review guidelines and metrics. PLoS ONE. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/journal-information
Repiso, R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in the editorial process and peer review. Revista Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud, 6(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.317
Resnik, D. B., y Hosseini, M. (2025). Disclosing artificial intelligence use in scientific research and publication: When should disclosure be mandatory, optional, or unnecessary? Accountability in Research, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2025.2481949
Science/AAAS (2023). Editorial policies on the use of artificial intelligence. Science/AAAS. https://www.science.org/
Seghier, M. L. (2023). Using ChatGPT and other AI-assisted tools to improve manuscripts readability and language. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, 33(3), 773–775. https://doi.org/10.1002/ima.22902
Springer Nature (2024). Reviewer Finder and peer review tools. Springer Nature. https://www.springernature.com/gp
STM Association (2023). STM Integrity Hub: AI and ethics in publishing. STM Association. https://www.stm-assoc.org/integrity-hub
Tabatadze, B. (2024). Technological Aspects of Open Journal Systems (OJS). Journal of Technical Science and Technologies, 8(1), 23-29.
Taylor & Francis Group (2024). Editorial integrity and AI guidelines. Taylor & Francis Group. https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com
Torres, G. A., Torres, J. M., y Pacheco, M. C. (2025). Inteligencia artificial generativa: Impactos y dilemas éticos en el ámbito educativo. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), XXXI(2), 535-543. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v31i2.43784
Tuquinga-Cercado, M. A., López-Ramírez, M. L., Gutiérrez-Aguayo, J. A., y Delgado-Fajardo, S. J. (2025). Análisis crítico del uso de inteligencia artificial en la formación de estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), XXXI(E-12), 319-334. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v31i.44567
Weber-Wulff, D., Anohina-Naumeca, A., Bjelobaba, S., Foltýnek, T., Guerrero-Dib, J., Popoola, O., Šigut, P., y Waddington, L. (2023). Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19, 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z
Wiley (2025). ManuscriptCheck. Wiley. https://authorservices.wiley.com/author-resources/Journal-Authors/Prepare/manuscriptcheck.html
World Association of Medical Editors - WAME (2025). Home. World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). https://www.wame.org/
Wu, J., Sanchez-Diaz, I., Yang, Y., y Qu, X. (2024). Why is your paper rejected? Lessons learned from over 5,000 rejected transportation papers. Communications in Transportation Research, 4, 100129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2024.100129
Agrawal, A., Gans, J. S., y Goldfarb, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence adoption and system-wide change. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 33(2), 327-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12521
Alves, L., Carvalho, M., y Dias, L. (2022). Transparência e processo editorial: Como é o trabalho das Editoras-chefes? Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 38(6), e00089822. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311xpt089822
Aries Systems Corporation (2023). Editorial Manager and ProduXion Manager workflow automation. Aries Systems Corporation. https://www.ariessys.com
Association for Psychological Science (December, 2023). APS editorial policies. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/publications/aps-editorial-policies
Banh, L., y Strobel, G. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence. Electronic Markets, 33(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00680-1
BMJ Publishing Group (2024). BMJ editorial policies on artificial intelligence and integrity in research. BMJ Publishing Group. https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors
Bustamante-Limones, A., Rodriguez-Borges, C., y Pérez-Rodríguez, J. A. (2024). Evaluación del uso de gemelos digitales en los sistemas de producción. AiBi Revista de Investigación, Administración e Ingeniería, 12(3), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.15649/2346030X.4382
Candal-Pedreira, C., Rey-Brandariz, J., Varela-Lema, L., Pérez-Ríos, M., y Ruano-Ravina, A. (2023). Los desafíos de la revisión por pares: Cómo garantizar la calidad y transparencia del proceso editorial de las revistas científicas. Anales de Pediatría, 99(1), 54-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpedi.2023.05.017
Cárdenas-Oliveros, J. A., Rodríguez-Borges, C. G., Pérez-Rodríguez, J. A., y Valencia-Zambrano, X. H. (2022). Desarrollo del pensamiento crítico: Metodología para fomentar el aprendizaje en ingeniería. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), XXVIII(4), 512-530. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v28i4.39145
Carobene, A., Padoan, A., Cabitza, F., Banfi, G., y Plebani, M. (2024). Rising adoption of artificial intelligence in scientific publishing: Evaluating the role, risks, and ethical implications in paper drafting and review process. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 62(5), 835-843. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-1136
Chang, H., y Kong, H.-J. (2018). A new online journal management system. Healthcare Informatics Research, 24(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2018.24.1.1
Comisión Europea (2025). Quienes somos. Comisión Europea. https://commission.europa.eu/index_es
Committee on Publication Ethics – COPE (2023). Position statement on artificial intelligence tools in research publication. Committee on Publication Ethics. https://doi.org/10.24318/cCVRZBms
Cress, U., y Kimmerle, J. (2023). Co-constructing knowledge with generative AI tools: Reflections from a CSCL perspective. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(4), 607-614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09409-w
Delli, A., y D’Auria, V. (2021). Digital Ethnography: A systematic literature review. Italian Sociological Review, 11(4S), 243-267. https://doi.org/10.13136/isr.v11i4S.434
Díaz, D. (2024). Herramientas para detectar el Plagio a la Inteligencia Artificial: ¿Cuán útiles son? Revista CoGnosis, 9(2), 144-150.
Doskaliuk, B., Zimba, O., Yessirkepov, M., Klishch, I., y Yatsyshyn, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence in peer review: Enhancing efficiency while preserving integrity. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 40(7), e92. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e92
Elkhatat, A. M., Elsaid, K., y Almeer, S. (2023). Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00140-5
Elsevier (2024). Generative AI policies for journals. Elsevier. https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/generative-ai-policies-for-journals
Farber, S. (2024). Enhancing peer review efficiency: A mixed-methods analysis of artificial intelligence-assisted reviewer selection across academic disciplines. Learned Publishing, 37(4), e1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1638
Fiorillo, L., y Mehta, V. (2024). Accelerating editorial processes in scientific journals: Leveraging AI for rapid manuscript review. Oral Oncology Reports, 10, 100511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oor.2024.100511
Forberg, P., y Schilt, K. (2023). What is ethnographic about digital ethnography? A sociological perspective. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1156776. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1156776
Fyfe, A., Squazzoni, F., Torny, D., y Dondio, P. (2019). Managing the growth of peer review at the Royal Society journals, 1865–1965. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 45(3), 405-429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919862868
Ganjavi, C., Eppler, M. B., Pekcan, A., Biedermann, B., Abreu, A., Collins, G. S., Gill, I. S., y Cacciamani, G. E. (2024). Publishers’ and journals’ instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: Bibliometric analysis. BMJ, 384, e077192. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-077192
Gatrell, C., Muzio, D., Post, C., y Wickert, C. (2024). Here, there and everywhere: On the responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI) in management research and the peer-review process. Journal of Management Studies, 61(3), 739-751. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13045
Goretti, L., Küsters, A., Morgana, S., y Sharma, A. (2024). Challenges and opportunities of using generative AI for research: Opening the discussion. The International Spectator, 60(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2024.2435176
Hanson, M. A., Gómez, P., Crosetto, P., y Brockington, D. (2023). The strain on scientific publishing. Quantitative Science Studies, 5(4), 823-843. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00327
Hernández-León, N., y Rodríguez-Conde, M.-J. (2024a). Cómo nos puede ayudar la inteligencia artificial a hacer un análisis sistemático de literatura científica (SLR): Ejemplo práctico sobre “la inteligencia artificial aplicada a la educación”. En I. Cabero (Coord.), Perspectivas contemporáneas en educación: Innovación, investigación y transformación (pp. 567-585). Dykinson.
Hernández-León, N., y Rodríguez-Conde, M.-J. (2024b). Inteligencia artificial aplicada a la educación y la evaluación educativa en la universidad: Introducción de sistemas de tutorización inteligentes, sistemas de reconocimiento y otras tendencias futuras. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 24(78). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.594651
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors - ICMJE (2024). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/
JAMA Network (2025). Home. JAMA Network. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama
Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (2025). Editorial policies. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. https://www.jiem.org/index.php/jiem/about/editorialPolicies
Kaebnick, G. E., Magnus, D. C., Kao, A., Hosseini, M., Resnik, D., Dubljević, V., Rentmeester, C., Gordijn, B., y Cherry, M. J. (2023). Editors’ statement on the responsible use of generative AI technologies in scholarly journal publishing. Hastings Center Report, 53(5), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1507
Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., y Li, N. (2025). Exploring students’ perspectives on generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1265-1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7
Kousha, K., y Thelwall, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review. Learned Publishing, 37(1), 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1570
Leung, T. I., De Azevedo, T., Mavragani, A., y Eysenbach, G. (2023). Best practices for using AI tools as an author, peer reviewer, or editor. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e51584. https://doi.org/10.2196/51584
Liebrenz, M., Schleifer, R., Buadze, A., Bhugra, D., y Smith, A. (2023). Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: Ethical challenges for medical publishing. The Lancet Digital Health, 5(3), e105-e106. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00019-5
Ling, X., y Yan, S. (2023). Let’s be fair: What about an AI editor? Accountability in Research, 31(8), 1253-1254. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2223997
Lund, B. D., y Naheem, K. T. (2024). Can ChatGPT be an author? A study of artificial intelligence authorship policies in top academic journals. Learned Publishing, 37(1), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1582
Mendoza, W. S., Díaz-Guecha, L. Y., Numa-Sanjuán, N., y Herrera, S. (2025). Inteligencia Artificial Generativa y sus consideraciones éticas en el derecho: Una valoración exploratoria sobre la práctica. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), XXXI(4), 206-222. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v31i4.44848
Moradzadeh, M., Sedghi, S., y Panahi, S. (2022). Towards a new paradigm for ‘journal quality’ criteria: A scoping review. Scientometrics, 128, 279-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04520-5
Morán-Ortega, S.-A., Ruiz-Tirado, S.-G., Simental-López, L.-M., y Tirado-López, A.-B. (2024). Barreras de la inteligencia artificial generativa en estudiantes de educación superior: Percepción docente. Revista de Investigación en Tecnologías de la Información, 12(25), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.36825/riti.12.25.003
Nature Portfolio (2023). Editorial policies and peer review process. Nature Portfolio. https://www.nature.com/nature-portfolio
Nuijten, M. B., y Wicherts, J. M. (2024). Implementing statcheck during peer review is related to a steep decline in statistical-reporting inconsistencies. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241258945
Ooi, K.-B., Tan, G. W.-H., Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Capatina, A., Chakraborty, A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Huang, T.-L., Kar, A. K., Lee, V.-H., Loh, X.-M., Micu, A., Mikalef, P., Mogaji, E., Pandey, N., Raman, R., Rana, N. P., Sarker, P., Sharma, A., … Wong, L.-W. (2025). The potential of generative artificial intelligence across disciplines: Perspectives and future directions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 65(1), 76-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2023.2261010
Osasona, F., Amoo, O. O., Atadoga, A., Abrahams, T. O., Farayola, O. A., y Ayinla, B. S. (2024). Reviewing the ethical implications of AI in decision making processes. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(2), 322-335. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i2.773
Pezzullo, A. M., y Boccia, S. (2024). Growth and challenges in biomedical scientific publishing. European Journal of Public Health, 34(S_3), ckae144.677. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.677
Pividori, M., y Greene, C. S. (2023). A publishing infrastructure for AI-assisted academic authoring [Preprint]. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.21.525030
PLoS ONE (2023). Peer review guidelines and metrics. PLoS ONE. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/journal-information
Repiso, R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in the editorial process and peer review. Revista Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud, 6(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.317
Resnik, D. B., y Hosseini, M. (2025). Disclosing artificial intelligence use in scientific research and publication: When should disclosure be mandatory, optional, or unnecessary? Accountability in Research, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2025.2481949
Science/AAAS (2023). Editorial policies on the use of artificial intelligence. Science/AAAS. https://www.science.org/
Seghier, M. L. (2023). Using ChatGPT and other AI-assisted tools to improve manuscripts readability and language. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, 33(3), 773–775. https://doi.org/10.1002/ima.22902
Springer Nature (2024). Reviewer Finder and peer review tools. Springer Nature. https://www.springernature.com/gp
STM Association (2023). STM Integrity Hub: AI and ethics in publishing. STM Association. https://www.stm-assoc.org/integrity-hub
Tabatadze, B. (2024). Technological Aspects of Open Journal Systems (OJS). Journal of Technical Science and Technologies, 8(1), 23-29.
Taylor & Francis Group (2024). Editorial integrity and AI guidelines. Taylor & Francis Group. https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com
Torres, G. A., Torres, J. M., y Pacheco, M. C. (2025). Inteligencia artificial generativa: Impactos y dilemas éticos en el ámbito educativo. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), XXXI(2), 535-543. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v31i2.43784
Tuquinga-Cercado, M. A., López-Ramírez, M. L., Gutiérrez-Aguayo, J. A., y Delgado-Fajardo, S. J. (2025). Análisis crítico del uso de inteligencia artificial en la formación de estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), XXXI(E-12), 319-334. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v31i.44567
Weber-Wulff, D., Anohina-Naumeca, A., Bjelobaba, S., Foltýnek, T., Guerrero-Dib, J., Popoola, O., Šigut, P., y Waddington, L. (2023). Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19, 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z
Wiley (2025). ManuscriptCheck. Wiley. https://authorservices.wiley.com/author-resources/Journal-Authors/Prepare/manuscriptcheck.html
World Association of Medical Editors - WAME (2025). Home. World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). https://www.wame.org/
Wu, J., Sanchez-Diaz, I., Yang, Y., y Qu, X. (2024). Why is your paper rejected? Lessons learned from over 5,000 rejected transportation papers. Communications in Transportation Research, 4, 100129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2024.100129
Publicado
2026-02-20
Cómo citar
Pérez-Rodríguez, J. A., Rodríguez-Borges, C. G., Guillén-Intriago, M. M., & Pita Mera, M. V. (2026). Transformación de procesos y políticas editoriales de las revistas científicas frente al uso de inteligencia artificial. Revista De Ciencias Sociales, 32(1), 278-305. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v32i1.45202
Número
Sección
Artículos
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
