Transaction Cost Structure on Agribusiness System of Cassava in Lampung Province
Resumen
The high transaction costs often make the production process in cassava farming inefficient that the income received is not optimal. Transaction costs di- rectly reduce the income of the farmers, especially at the long harvest time and the risk of high price on cassava farming. Transaction costs are difficult to avoid, that it causes the economic pressure for the farmers due to the large surplus transfer from farmers to other parties. The research objective is to find out how much the transaction cost structure is which occurs in the process of cassava farming in Lampung Province. The research method used is a deep interview method for each interview activity. The analytical tool used in this study is transaction cost analysis. The population of Cluster I which located in Terusan Nunyai Sub district in this study were 854 farmers consisting of 473 cassava farmers in Bandar Agung Village, and 381 cassava farmers in Bandar Sakti Village. Mean while, the population of Cluster II which located in Rum- bia District is 1.712 farmers consisting of 951 cassava farmers in Ruki Basuki Village, and 761 cassava farmers in Bina Karya Putra Village. The sampling technique was obtained by doing the simple random sampling method. The number of samples at the study in Central Lampung Regency was 271 peo- ple. From the transaction cost structure research, it could be concluded that there are 2 (two) transaction fee structure scenarios in the cassava agribusi- ness system with an average farm size of 0,95 hectares, namely (a) transaction cost structure with farm financing of Rp. 795.525,44 and (b) transaction costs structure without farm financing of Rp. 625.222,68. The largest transaction costs for businesses was Rp. 431.134,88 (54,19% ) higher than transaction costs on financing (21,41%) and cassava selling (24,40%). This happens because farmers have to do farming planning, supplying farming inputs, and doing farm operations. One of the biggest components in transaction costs in the supply of cassava farming inputs is lost farmer income.Citas
Akmal, 2006. Koordinasi Antar Instansi Terkait dalam Pelaksanaan Pem- bangunan di Daerah. Jurnal Demokrasi, 5(1) : 1-12.
Allen, D.W. 2005. Marriage as an institution : A New Institutional Economic Approach. Simon Fraser University : Kanada.
Arifin, B. 2006. Transaction Cost Analysis of Upstream-Downstream Re- lations in Watershed Services : Lessons From Community-Based Forestry Management in Sumatera, Indonesia. Journal ofInternational Agriculture, 45(4) : 361-375.
Anggraeni, N.L.V., Muhammad, A.Z.M. dan Bambang, S.H. 2014. Peran dan Koordinasi Stakeholder dalam Pengembangan Kawasan Minapolitan di Keacamatan Nglegok Kabupaten Blitar. JurnalAdministrasi Publik, 3(12) : 2070-2076.
Baye, M.R.(2010). Managerial Economics and Business Strategy. McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York
Berge, L. I. O., Bjorvatn, K., &Tungodden, B. (2015). Human and Fi- nancial Capital for Microenterprise Development: Evidence from a Field and Lab Experiment. Management Science, 61(4), 707–722. doi:10.1287/ mnsc.2014.1933
Bourguignon, H., R. Gomes, J. Tirole. 2019. Shrouded transaction cost : must-take cards, discounts and surcharges. International Journal of In- dustrial Organization, Vol. 63 : 99-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijin- dorg.2018.10.004
D’Hondt, C., Giraud, J. 2008. Transaction Cost Analysis A-Z. An EDHEC Risk and Asset Management Research Center Publication. France
Furubotn, E. G., and Rudolf R. 2005. Institutions and Economic Theory : The Contribution of the New Intitutional Economics. Second Edition. Ann Arbor : The University of Michigan Press.
Li, Y., H. Wang, W. Du, M. Perc, X. Cao, J. Zhang. 2019. Resonance-Like Cooperation Due to Transaction Costs in The Prisoner’s Dilemma Game. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. Vol. 521 : 248-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.01.088
Matungul, P. M., Lyne, M. C., &Ortmann, G. F. (2001). Transaction costs and crop marketing in the communal areas of Impendle and Swayima na, KwaZulu-Natal. Development Southern Africa, 18(3), 347–363. doi:10.1080/03768350120070017
Martins R, Serra FR, Leite AS, Ferreira MP dan Li D. 2010. Transaction Cost Theory influence in strategy research: A review through a bibliomet- ric study in leading journals. Working paper No.61/2010 April. globAd- vantage Center of Research in International Business and Strategy
Moekijat. 1994. Koordinasi (Suatu Tinjauan Teori).Bandung : MandarMa- ju.
Mulyana, D. 2005. Ilmu Komunikasi : Suatu Pengatar. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya.
North D.C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Perfor- mance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
North and Thomas. 1973. Rise of the Western World a New Economic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Petersen, H., E. Baekkeskov, M. Potoski, T.L. Brown. 2019. Measuring and Managing Ex Ante Transaction Cost in Public Sector Contracting. Public Administration Review. 79(5) : 621-802.
Rahman, A. 2011. Analisis Biaya Transaksi dan Pelaksanaan Pola Kem- intraan Usaha Ayam Ras Pedaging di Kabupaten Maros (tesis). Program Studi Agribisnis. Universitas Hasanuddin. Makasar.
Sarafina, R., Bukhari, U., Yulfitra, A. 2019. Analisis Manajemen Transpor- tasi pada Angkutan Mini Bus. Jurnal Humaniora, 3(1) : 1-13
Saidah, Z. 2018. Analisis Biaya Produksi dan Biaya Transaksi Pada Us- ahatani Cabai Merah (capsicum annum L.). UNES Journal Agricultural Scienties, 2 (1) : 27 – 40.
Seng, T.J., Elizabeth, N.K.L. 2004. Strategies for Effective Cross – Cul- tural Negotiation: The F.R.A.M.E. Approach. Singapore : McGraw-Hill Education.
Setiani, B. 2015. Prinsip-Prinsip Pokok Pengelolaan Jasa Transportasi Udara. Jurnal Ilmiah Widya 3(2) :103-109.
Setyanti, A.M. 2016. Analisis Biaya Transaksi Kelembagaan Kelompok Tani di Indonesia. http://www.scribed.com/document/335393060/analisis-biaya-transak- si-kelembagaan-kelompoktani-docx [diakses 26 September 2017].
Sultan, H. Dan D. Rachmina, 2015. Pengaruh Biaya Transaksi Terhadap Keuntungan Usahatani Kedelai di Kabupaten Lamongan, Jawa Timur. De- partemen Agribisnis, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen, Institut Pertani- an Bogor : Bogor
Sugiarto, D. Siagian, L.S. Sunarto, dan D.S. Oetomo. 2003. Teknik Sam- pling. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Sutopo. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Dasar Teori Dan Terapannya Dalam Penelitian. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Yeager, J. Timothy. 1999. Institutions, Transition Economies, and Econom- ic Development. Political Economy of Global Interdependence Oxford.
Yustika, A.E. 2012. Ekonomi Kelembagaan : Paradigma, Teori, dan Kebi- jakan. Erlangga. Jakarta : 305 halaman
Yustika AE. 2007. Corporate governance of sugar mills in East Java: atransaction cost economics perspective. JurnalManajemendanKewirau- sahaan (Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship) 9(1): 1–17
Williamson, O.E., 1986. Economic Organization : Firms, Market and Pol- icy Control. New
York : New York University Press
Williamson OE. 1981. The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach. The American Journal of Sociology, 87(3): 548-577.
Williamson OE. 1989. Transaction Cost Economics: An Introduction. Handbook of Industrial Organization, Volume I. Elsevier Science Publish- ers B.V. 1989. University of California, Berkeley.
Wiriaatmadja, S. 1980. Pokok-Pokok Penyuluhan Pertanian. CV. Yasagu- na. Jakarta. 127 halaman
Williamson OE. 2010. Transaction Cost Economics: The natural progres- sion. Journal of Retailing 86(3): 215–226.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jre- tai.2010.07.005.
Yeager, J. Timothy. 1999. Institutions, Transition Economies, and Econom- ic Development. Political Economy of Global Interdependence Oxford.
Yustika AE. 2007. Corporate governance of sugar mills in East Java: atransaction cost economics perspective. Jurnal manajemen danKewirau- sahaan (Journal of management andentrepreneurship) 9(1): 1–17.
Yustika, A.E. 2012. Ekonomi Kelembagaan : Paradigma, Teori, dan Kebi- jakan. Erlangga. Jakarta : 305 halaman
Zakaria, W.A. 1999. Analisis Penawaran dan Permintaan Produk Ubikayu di Propinsi Lampung. Disertasi. Institut Pertanian Bogor : Bogor
Zulfiandri, M.S. Maarif, A. Hermawan, H. Hardjomidjojo. 2017. Biaya Transaksi dan Benefit Cost pada Integrasi Vertikal Rantai Nilai Agroin- dutri Kakao Skala Kecil. Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis, 14(3): 187- 197.
Zulkarnain dan Mangiring, W. 2017. Analisis Biaya Transaksi pada Kelem- bagaan Pertanian Gapoktan Penerima Program Pengembangan Usaha Ag- ribisnis Pedesaan (PUAP) di Desa Raman Aji Kecamatan Raman Utara Kabupaten Lampung Timur. Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Terapan, 17(3) : 186-196. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25181/jppt.v17i3.325
