Effect of water spray treatment controlled for environmental temperature on productivity and animal welfare in grow-finish pigs

  • Luis Silva-Riofrío Agroindustrial El Mosaico. Los Ríos, Ecuador - Universidad UTE, Sede Santo Domingo, Facultad de Ciencias de la Ingeniería e Industrias, Grupo de Investigación para la Producción Agropecuaria y Manejo del Medio Ambiente. Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Ecuador
  • Oscar Silva-Paredes Agroindustrial El Mosaico. Los Ríos, Ecuador
  • María Lugo-Almarza Clínica Veterinaria del Pacífico. Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Ecuador
  • Rodrigo Saquicela-Rojas Universidad UTE, Sede Santo Domingo, Facultad de Ciencias de la Ingeniería e Industrias, Grupo de Investigación para la Producción Agropecuaria y Manejo del Medio Ambiente. Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Ecuador
  • Carolina Fonseca-Restrepo Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Facultad de Ciencias Zootécnicas, Departamento de Producción Animal. Chone, Ecuador
  • Francisco Angulo-Cubillán Universidad UTE, Sede Santo Domingo, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Grupo de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias. Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Ecuador - Universidad del Zulia, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Departamento de Sanidad Animal. Maracaibo, Zulia, Venezuela
Keywords: Pigs, fattening, water spray, productivity, animal welfare

Abstract

In order to determine the effect of the use of water spray controlled by environmental temperature, on productivity and animal welfare in pigs in the grow finish phase, an investigation was carried out in a commercial pig farm located in the Province of Los Ríos, Ecuador. Thirty animals were use per treatment, which consisted of the use of spraying regulated by ambient temperature and the control group, equally divided by sex, evaluating productive (PV) and animal welfare (AW) variables. Among the PV are final weight, weight gain, daily weight gain, weight and performance to the carcass, and AW, position, aggressiveness and interaction between individuals and back superficial temperature. The data were analyzed through of variance-covariance analysis. The treatment showed a significant effect (P<0.05) in the carcass weight and sex interaction, in the position, feeding, social interaction and dorsal body temperature. The variables daily weight gain performance to the final weight carcass, drinking water, lifting, aggressiveness did not show an effect of the spray treatment (P<0.05). The use of spraying water controlled by environmental temperature is a favorable strategy to improve productive aspects and animal welfare in grow finish-fattening pigs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BARROS, J.; TRONCOSO, A. Introducción, conceptos y objetivos. Atlas Climatológico del Ecuador. Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito. 153 pp. 2010.

CANDIANI, D.; SALAMANO, G.; MELLIA, E.; DOGLIONE, L.; BRUNO, R.; TOUSSAINT, M.; GRUYS, E. A Combination of Behavioral and Physiological Indicators for Assessing Pig Welfare on the Farm. J. Appl. Anim. Welfare. Sci. 11: 1-13. 2008.

COMISIÓN NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA Y TECNOLÓGICA (FONDECYT-CONICYT). Aspectos bioéticos del uso de animales de experimentación en investigación científica. Aspectos Bioéticos de la experimentación animal. Editorial Andros Impresores, Santiago de Chile. 140 pp. 2009.

GARCÍA-CORTÉS, L.A.; GOMEZ-RAYA, L.; RAUW, W.M.; PEÑA, E.D.; CIRUELOS, J.; IZQUIERDO, E. Impact of environmental temperature on production traits in pigs. Scientif. Rep. 10(1): 2106. 2020.

GIBSON, T.; JACKSON, E. The economics of animal welfare. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 36(1): 125-135. 2017.

GODYN, D.; HERBUT, P.; ANGRECKA, S.; VIEIRA, F. M. Use of Different Cooling Methods in Pig Facilities to Alleviate the Effects of Heat Stress—A Review. Anim. 10(9): 1459-1473. 2020.

GODYN, D.; NOWICKI, J.; HERBUT, P. Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Pig Welfare. Anim. 9: 383-400. 2019.

JÄÄSKELÄINEN, T.; KAUPPINEN, T.; VESALA, K.; VALROS, A. Relationships between pig welfare, productivity and farmer dispositions. Anim. Welfare. 23: 435-443. 2014.

KPODO, K.R.; DUTTLINGER, A.D.; JOHNSON, J.S. Effects of pen location on thermoregulation and growth performance in grow-finish pigs during late summer. Transl. Anim. Sci. 3: 1375–1382. 2019.

LARSEN, M.L.; BERTELSEN, M.; PEDERSEN, L.J. Review: Factor affecting fouling in conventional pens for slaughter pigs. Anim. 12(2): 322-328. 2018.

MONTORO, J.C.; MANZANILLA, E.G.; SOLA-ORIOL, D.; MUNS, R.; GASA, J.; CLEAR, O.; DÍAZ, J.A. Predicting Productive Performance in Grow-Finisher Pigs Using Birth and Weaning Body Weight. Anim. 10: 1-13. 2020.

MORALES, A.; CHÁVEZ, M.; VÁSQUEZ, N.; HTOO, J. K.; BUENABAD, L.; ESPINOZA, S.; CERVANTES, M. Increased dietary protein or free amino acids supply for heat stress pigs: effect on performance and carcass traits. J. Anim. Sci. 96: 1419-1429. 2018.

MUTUA, J.Y.; MARSHALL, K.; PAUL, B.K.; NOTENBAERT, A.M. A methodology for mapping current and future heat stress risk in pigs. Anim. 14(9): 1952-1960. 2020.

RAUW, W.M.; PEÑA, E.D.; GOMEZ-RAYA, L.; CORTÉS, L.; CIRUELOS, J.J.; IZQUIERDO, E. Impact of environmental temperature on production traits in pigs. Sci. Rep. 10: 2106. 2020.

RIOJA-LANG, F.C.; BROWN, J.A.; BROCKHOFF, E.J.; FAUCITANO, L. A Review of Swine Trasportation Research on Priority Welfare Issues: A Canadian Perspective. Front. Vet. Sci. 6: 1-12. 2019.

SILVA-RIOFRÍA, T. Evaluación de la utilización y grado de inclinación de ventiladores sobre condiciones ambientales y parámetros zootécnicos en cerdos de engorde en la granja El Mosaico. Universidad de las Américas. Tesis de Grado. 89 pp. 2020.

SONG, J.I.; PARK, K.H.; JEON, J.H.; CHOI, H.L.; BARROGA, A.J. Dynamics of Air Temperature, Velocity and Ammonia Emissions in Enclosed and Conventional Pig Housing Systems. Asian--Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 26(3): 433-442. 2013.

SOUSA DOS SANTOS, L.; POMAR, C.; CAMPOS, P.; CANDIDO DA SILVA, W.; GOBI, J.; VEIRA, A.; ZEM-FRAGA, A.; HAUSCHILD, L. Precision feeding strategy for growing pigs under heat stress conditions. J. Anim. Sci. 96(11): 4789-4801. 2018.

STATISTIC ANALYSIS SYSTEM INSTITUTE (SAS). Cary, NC 27513, USA. Version 6. 1996.

VAN DEN BROEKE, A.; ALUWÉ, M.; VAN MEENSEL, J.; MILLET, S. The effect of sex and slaughter weight on performance, carcass quality and gross margin, assessed on three commercial pig farms. Anim. 14(7): 1546-1554. 2020.

VERMEER, H. M.; HOPSTER, H. Operationalizing principle-based standards for animal welfare-Indicators for climate problems in pig houses. Anim. 8: 1-15. 2018.

WON, Y.S.; HYEON, K.M.; JUNG-SEOK, C.; SANG-KEUN, J.; MAN-YONG, P.; CHUL, Y.L. Effects of the plane of nutrition during the latter grower and entire finisher phases on grow-finish pig performance in summer. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 61(1): 10-17. 2019.

Published
2022-07-25
How to Cite
1.
Silva-Riofrío L, Silva-Paredes O, Lugo-Almarza M, Saquicela-Rojas R, Fonseca-Restrepo C, Angulo-Cubillán F. Effect of water spray treatment controlled for environmental temperature on productivity and animal welfare in grow-finish pigs. Rev. Cient. FCV-LUZ [Internet]. 2022Jul.25 [cited 2024May20];32:1-. Available from: https://www.produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/cientifica/article/view/38510
Section
Animal Production