Pathogen survival in dairy and plant-based probiotic fermented beverages containing Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG

• Esra Yılmaz Başar Selcuk University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Food Hygiene and Technology. 42130, Konya, Türkiye. https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7336-2106
• Arife Ezgi Telli Selcuk University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Food Hygiene and Technology. 42130, Konya, Türkiye. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8899-4537

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52973/rcfcv-e362895

Keywords: Plant-based milk alternatives, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, probiotic viability, pathogen inhibition, fermented functional beverages

Abstract

The survival of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and two foodborne pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli) was monitored in L. rhamnosus GG – supplemented dairy milk and three plant-based alternatives (soy, almond, and coconut). Microbiological measurements were taken during fermentation (24 hours) and refrigerated storage (21 days, 4°C), using the L. rhamnosus GG – supplemented dairy group as the reference matrix for comparisons. Across all matrices, L. rhamnosus GG maintained counts above 7 log CFU·mL–1 throughout the experimental period. L. rhamnosus GG numbers did not differ significantly between dairy and plant-based milks (P>0.05). Although time, milk type, and their interaction were statistically significant (P<0.05), the observed shifts did not translate into a loss of L. rhamnosus GG culturability, and counts remained stable across milk types during storage. By day 21, S. aureus and E. coli counts were lower in almond and coconut milk than in soy and dairy milk (P<0.05). Overall, plant-based milk alternatives particularly almond and coconut appeared to be effective carriers for L. rhamnosus GG and performed comparably to dairy milk in sustaining probiotic viability. Because pathogen reduction was matrix-dependent, future work should examine underlying matrix-microbe interactions and validate these findings at industrial scale using integrated microbiological, physicochemical, and compositional analyses.

References

Paul AA, Kumar S, Kumar V, Sharma R. Milk Analog: Plant based alternatives to conventional milk, production, potential and health concerns. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. [Internet]. 2020; 60(18):3005–3023. doi: https://doi.org/gj33hn

Zahrani AJA, Shori AB. Viability of probiotics and antioxidant activity of soy and almond milk fermented with selected strains of probiotic Lactobacillus spp. LWT 2023; 176:114531. doi: https://doi.org/g6jmr8

Ranadheera RDCS, Baines SK, Adams MC. Importance of food in probiotic efficacy. Food Res. Int. [Internet]. 2010; 43(1):1–7. doi: https://doi.org/cwcsx8

Craig WJ, Fresán U. International analysis of the nutritional content and a review of health benefits of non-dairy plant-based beverages. Nutrients [Internet]. 2021; 13(3):842. doi: https://doi.org/gqzs25

Kyrylenko A, Eijlander RT, Alliney G, Lucas-van de Bos E, Wells-Bennik MHJ. Levels and types of microbial contaminants in different plant-based ingredients used in dairy alternatives. Int. J. Food Microbiol. [Internet]. 2023; 407:110392. doi: https://doi.org/gszqzb

Rasika DMD, Vidanarachchi JK, Luiz SF, Azeredo DRP, Cruz AG, Ranadheera CS. Probiotic delivery through non-dairy plant-based food matrices. Agriculture [Internet]. 2021; 11(7):599. doi: https://doi.org/qx29

Abebe E, Gugsa G, Ahmed M. Review on major food–borne zoonotic bacterial pathogens. J. Trop. Med. [Internet]. 2020; 2020:4674235. doi: https://doi.org/gmq43k

Fetsch A, Johler S. Staphylococcus aureus as a foodborne pathogen. Curr. Clin. Microbiol. Rep. [Internet]. 2018; 5:88–96. doi: https://doi.org/qx3b

Lorenzo JM, Munekata PE, Dominguez-Valencia R, Pateiro M, Saraiva JA, Franco D. Main groups of microorganisms of relevance for food safety and stability: General aspects and overall description. In: Barba FJ, Santana AS, Orlien V, Koubaa M, editors. Innovative technologies for food preservation. London (UK): Academic Press; 2018 [cited 20 Dec 2025]. p. 53–107. Available in: https://goo.su/H0F4

Yeşilova Y, Sula B, Yavuz E, Uçmak D. Probiyotikler [Probiotics]. J. Kartal TR. 2010; 21(1):49–56. https://goo.su/EsJ6t

Tomasello F, Valero A, Serraino A, Possas A. Methods of inoculation and quantification for collecting data on microbial responses in foods. In: Alvarenga VO, editor. Basic protocols in predictive food microbiology. New York (USA): Springer; 2023. p. 31–46. doi: https://doi.org/qx7z

Tekinşen OC, Atasever M, Keleş A, Tekinşen KK. Süt, Yoğurt, Tereyağı, Peynir: Üretim control [Milk, Yogurt, Butter, Cheese: Production control]. Konya (Türkiye): Selçuk University Press; 2002. 91 p. Turkish.

Kılınç GE, Keser A, Özer HB. Determination of nutritional value, antioxidant activities, microbiological and sensory properties of almond, soy and oat based fermented beverages. J. Culin. Sci. Technol. [Internet]. 2026; 24(1):16–32. doi: https://doi.org/qx75

Fatima SM, Hekmat S. Microbial and sensory analysis of soy and dairy milk-based yogurt as a probiotic matrix for Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR–1. Fermentation [Internet]. 2020; 6(3):74. doi: https://doi.org/qx76

Bouarab-Chibane L, Degraeve P, Ferhout H, Bouajila J, Oulahal N. Plant antimicrobial polyphenols as potential natural food preservatives. J. Sci. Food Agric. [Internet]. 2019; 99(4):1457–1474. doi: https://doi.org/gkf5jt

Nitbani FO, Tjitda PJP, Nitti F, Jumina J, Detha AIR. Antimicrobial properties of lauric acid and monolaurin in virgin coconut oil: a review. ChemBioEng. Rev. [Internet]. 2022; 9(5):442–461. doi: https://doi.org/qx78

Mandalari G, Bisignano C, D’Arrigo M, Ginestra G, Arena A, Tomaino A, Wickham MSJ. Antimicrobial potential of polyphenols extracted from almond skins. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. [Internet]. 2010; 51(1):83–89. doi: https://doi.org/d3kk9r

Eyres L, Eyres MF, Chisholm A, Brown RC. Coconut oil consumption and cardiovascular risk factors in humans. Nutr. Rev. [Internet]. 2016; 74(4):267–280. doi: https://doi.org/f8jfvd

Nasir NAMM, Abllah Z, Jalaludin AA, Shahdan IA, Abd-Manan WNHW. Virgin coconut oil and its antimicrobial properties against pathogenic microorganisms: a review. Adv. Health Sci. Res. [Internet]. 2018 [cited 13 Oct 2025]; 192–199. Available in: https://goo.su/ByKb

Shori AB, Al Zahrani AJ. Non-dairy plant-based milk products as alternatives to conventional dairy products for delivering probiotics. Food Sci. Technol. [Internet]. 2022; 42:e101321. doi: https://doi.org/qx8c

Jogi S, Adhao A, Pachori RR. Exploration of probiotic bacteria from plant based milk. Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev. [Internet]. 2024 [cited 22 Dec 2025]; 11(1):157–163. Available in: https://goo.su/xuUSjt

Genet BML, Xiao H, Christensen LF, Laforce IN, Mohammadifar MA, Bang-Berthelsen CH, Hansen EB. Selection of proteolytic LAB starter cultures for acidification of soy based dairy alternatives. LWT [Internet]. 2023; 184:115082. doi: https://doi.org/qx8h

Montemurro M, Pontonio E, Coda R, Rizzello CG. Plant-based alternatives to yogurt: state-of-the-art and perspectives of new biotechnological challenges. Foods. [Internet]. 2021; 10(2):316. doi: https://doi.org/gt57q2

Yuyama KT, Rohde M, Molinari G, Stadler M, Abraham WR. Unsaturated fatty acids control biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus and other gram-positive bacteria. Antibiotics 2020; 9(11):788. doi: https://doi.org/qx8k

Kusumah D, Wakui M, Murakami M, Xie X, Yukihito K, Maeda I. Linoleic acid, α–linolenic acid, and monolinolenins as antibacterial substances in the heat-processed soybean fermented with Rhizopus oligosporus. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. [Internet]. 2020; 84(6):1285–1290. doi: https://doi.org/qx8m

Demircan B. Probiyotik laktik asit bakterileri kullanılarak bitkisel süt ikamelerinden fermente içecek tasarımı [Production of novel vegetal based beverages fermented by probiotic lactic acid bacteria]. [master’s thesis on the Internet]. İstanbul (Türkiye): Istanbul Technical University; 2017 [cited 20 Jan 2026]. 99 p. Turkish. Available in: https://goo.su/Cd2kx

Deziderio MA, de Souza HF, Kamimura ES, Petrus RR. Plant-based fermented beverages: Development and characterization. Foods [Internet]. 2023; 12(22):4128. doi: https://doi.org/qx8n

Erik S, Ergenekon FS. Lor Peynirlerine İlave Edilen Probiyotik Kültürlerin Bazı Patojen Mikroorganizmaların Yaşam Süreleri Üzerine Etkisinin Araştırılması [Investigation of the effect of probiotic cultures added in lor cheese on the life span of some pathogenic microorganisms]. Akademik Et ve Süt Kurumu Derg. [Internet]. 2024 [cited 20 Dec 2025]; (7):4–14. Turkish. Available in: https://goo.su/ETJn3A8

Okur HH. Probiyotik Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103) suşu kullanarak fermente süt ürünü üretimi [Production of fermented milk product by using probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103) strain]. [master’s thesis on the Internet]. İzmir (Türkiye): Ege University; 2022 [Cited 20 Jan 2026]. 114 p. Turkish. Available in: https://goo.su/XnFVno8

Wang X, Kong X, Zhang C, Hua Y, Chen Y, Li X. Comparison of physicochemical properties and volatile flavor compounds of plant-based yoghurt and dairy yoghurt. Food Res. Int. [Internet]. 2023; 164:112375. doi: https://doi.org/grs87k

Masia C, Geppel A, Jensen PE, Buldo P. Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus on Physicochemical Properties of Fermented Plant-Based Raw Materials. Foods [Internet]. 2021; 10(3):573. doi: https://doi.org/gjp38f

Yiğit AA. Animal and plant-based milk and their antioxidant properties. MAEU Vet. Fak. Derg. [Internet]. 2019; 4(2):113–122. doi: https://doi.org/qx83