Comparison of clinical effects of four different anesthesia protocols in rabbits
Abstract
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical effects of four different anesthesia protocols in rabbits and to suggest a safe and controlled alternative inhalation anesthesia with endotracheal intubation technique for clinical applications and experimental studies in rabbits. A total of 40 New Zealand rabbits were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10). Propofol-sevoflurane, midazolam-sevoflurane, medetomidine- ketamine-sevoflurane and sevoflurane only. All anesthesia protocols were completed without causing death. Although the medetomidine-ketamine-sevoflurane provided the best surgical anesthesia (2.75 ± 0.5) and induction quality (2.90± 0.5), it caused significant decreases in HR and RR from baseline (230.6 ± 9.9 and 89.5±7.9, respectively) to the 10th min of anesthesia (167.1 ± 12.7 and 45.8 ± 4.9, respectively) (P < 0.05). The fastest anesthesia induction was observed in the propofol-sevoflurane (2.5 ± 0.5), while the medetomidine- ketamine-sevoflurane had the longest recovery time (84,0± 8,1). In the midazolam-sevoflurane group, intubation was significantly more difficult (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of post-anesthesia hematological effects. Based on the superior analgesic depth observed in this study and supported by previous literature, the medetomidine-ketamine-sevoflurane combination may be considered a suitable option for rabbits undergoing complex procedures. However, continuous monitoring of physiological parameters during and after anesthesia until full recovery is essential to prevent potential complications. Additionally, the propofol-sevoflurane combination appears to be a safe and suitable option for rabbits requiring imaging or immobilization, as it allows for rapid recovery and awakening.
Downloads
References
Andersen ML, Winter LMF. Animal models in biological and biomedical research - experimental and ethical concerns. An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. [Internet]. 2019; 91(suppl 1):e20170238. doi: https://doi.org/gbvmn9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720170238
Mukherjee P, Roy S, Ghosh D, Nandi SK. Role of animal models in biomedical research: a review. Lab. Anim. Res. [Internet]. 2022; 38(1):18. doi: https://doi.org/mdkp DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42826-022-00128-1
Henke J, Astner S, Brill T, Eissner B, Busch R, Erhardt W. Comparative study of three intramuscular anaesthetic combinations (medetomidine / ketamine, medetomidine / fentanyl / midazolam and xylazine/ketamine) in rabbits. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. [Internet]. 2005; 32(5):261–270. doi: https://doi.org/c72pzh DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2005.00242.x
Pieper EG, Carter JE, Firestone SM, Baron HR. A review of perioperative mortality in pet rabbits in Australia. Aust. Vet. J. [Internet]. 2025; 103(1–2):3–12. doi: https://doi.org/qksx DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.13391
Allweiler S, Leach MC, Flecknell PA. The use of propofol and sevoflurane for surgical anaesthesia in New Zealand White rabbits. Lab. Anim. [Internet]. 2010; 44(2):113–117. doi: https://doi.org/b4s4xv DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/la.2009.009036
Tearney CC, Barter LS, Pypendop BH. Cardiovascular effects of equipotent doses of isoflurane alone and isoflurane plus fentanyl in New Zealand White rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). AJVR. [Internet]. 2015; 76(7):591–598. doi: https://doi.org/f7jt45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.76.7.591
Cruz FSF, Carregaro AB, Raiser AG, Zimmerman M, Lukarsewski R, Steffen RPB. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and S(+)-ketamine in rabbits. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. [Internet]. 2010; 37(2):116–122. doi: https://doi.org/fsvfvb DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2009.00513.x
Mutoh T, Kojima K, Takao K, Nishimura R, Sasaki N. Comparison of Sevoflurane with Isoflurane for Rapid Mask Induction in Midazolam and Butorphanol-sedated Dogs. J. Vet. Med. Ser. A. [Internet]. 2001; 48(4):223–230. doi: https://doi.org/c8vpwv DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0442.2001.00350.x
Kati I, Demirel CB, Huseyinoglu UA, Silay E, Yagmur C, Coskuner I. Comparison of Propofol and Sevoflurane for Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. [Internet]. 2003; 200(3):111–118. doi: https://doi.org/b8k8n6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.200.111
Hedenqvist P, Orr HE, Roughan JV, Antunes LM, Flecknell PA. Anaesthesia with ketamine/medetomidine in the rabbit: influence of route of administration and the effect of combination with butorphanol. Vet. Anaesth. Analg.. [Internet]. 2002; 29(1):14–19. doi: https://doi.org/dm6n68 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-2987.2001.00058.x
Orr HE, Roughan JV, Flecknell PA. Assessment of ketamine and medetomidine anaesthesia in the domestic rabbit. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. [Internet]. 2005; 32(5):271–279. doi: https://doi.org/fdrcch DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2005.00211.x
Amarpal X, Kinjavdekar, Aithal HP, Pawde AM, Singh J, Udehiya R. Evaluation of Xylazine, Acepromazine and Medetomidine with Ketamine for General Anaesthesia in Rabbits. Scand. J. Lab. Anim. Sci. [Internet]. 2010; Vol 37(3):223–229. doi: https://doi.org/qks2
Campos S, Monteiro J, Valenzuela B, Gonçalinho H, De Pinho PG, Fresco P, Félix L, Antunes L. Evidence of Different Propofol Pharmacokinetics under Short and Prolonged Infusion Times in Rabbits. Basic. Clin. Pharma Tox. [Internet]. 2016; 118(6):421–431. doi: https://doi.org/f8tc5m DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.12521
Erol M, Erol H, Atalan G, Dogan Z, Yönez MK, Melek S. Effects of Systemically Used Midazolam, Ketamine and Isoflurane Anesthetic Agents on Intraocular Pressure and Tear Production in Rabbits. Harran Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. [Internet]. 2018; 7(1):21–25. doi: https://doi.org/qks3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31196/huvfd.458783
Yanmaz LE, Okur S, Turgut F, Golgeli A. Effects of intramuscular and intranasal administration of midazolam–dexmedetomidine on sedation and some cardiopulmonary variables in New Zealand White rabbits. Vet. Anaesth. Analg.. [Internet]. 2022; 49(1):113–117. doi: https://doi.org/qks4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2021.10.003
Fick TE, Schalm SW. A simple technique for endotracheal intubation in rabbits. Lab. Anim. [Internet]. 1987; 21(3):265–266. doi: https://doi.org/fj3f97 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/002367787781268837
Fujita M, Morimoto Y, Ishihara M, Shimizu M, Takase B, Maehara T, Kikuchi M. A new rabbit model of myocardial infarction without endotracheal intubation. J. Surg. Res. [Internet]. 2004; 116(1):124–128. doi: https://doi.org/brtbkm DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4804(03)00304-4
Thompson KL, Meier TR, Scholz JA. Endotracheal Intubation of Rabbits Using a Polypropylene Guide Catheter. JoVE. [Internet]. 2017; (129):e56369. doi: https://doi.org/qks5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3791/56369-v
Tran HS, Puc MM, Tran J-LV, Del Rossi AJ, Hewitt CW. A method of endoscopic endotracheal intubation in rabbits. Lab. Anim. [Internet]. 2001; 35(3):249–252. doi: https://doi.org/cwssx7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/0023677011911705
Flecknell PA, Roughan JV, Hedenqvist P. Induction of anaesthesia with sevoflurane and isoflurane in the rabbit. Lab. Anim. [Internet]. 1999; 33(1):41–46. doi: https://doi.org/ch977b DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/002367799780578516
Bassan T, Pastor J, Martinez-Caro J, Agulla B, Martorell J. Effects of sedation on haematological, biochemical, coagulation profile, and kaolin-activated thromboelastography in rabbits. Vet. J. [Internet]. 2025; 310:106298. doi: https://doi.org/qks6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2025.106298
Khalaf FH, Al-Zuhairi AH, Almutheffer EA. Clinical and hematological effect of acepromazine, midazolam, ketamine as general anesthetic protocol in rabbits. Int. J. Sci. Nat. [Internet]. 2014 [cited 14 Aug 2025]; 5(2):328–331. Avaliable in: https://goo.su/ZzSOOl
Karasu A, Altug N, Aslan L, Bakir B, Yuksek N. Evaluation of the anesthetic effects of xylazine-ketamine, xylazinetiletamine-zolazepam and tiletamine-zolazepam using clinical and laboratory parameters in rabbits. Med. Weterynaryjna. [Internet]. 2018; 74(10):646–652. doi: https://doi.org/qks7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21521/mw.6119
