The Legitimacy of the ‘Colectivos’ and the Police in Venezuela: A Comparative Public Opinion Study

• Roberto Briceno-Rosas https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0287-2463
• Roberto Briceño-León https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8882-7787

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8075145

Abstract

The so-called ‘Colectivos’ are one of the most prominent and controversial non-state armed groups in Venezuela. This study aims to compare the legitimacy of Colectivos against the level of support for the police, as state armed forces, using data from a survey of a nationally representative sample of public opinion conducted in 2021. For this purpose, data from 1,200 survey respondents is analyzed considering individual-level variables such as gender, education, work status, and political alignment, as well as contextual variables of the respondents, such as state of residence and urbanization level. The study employs a multilevel regression analysis to examine the individual and contextual factors influencing attitudes towards the polices and Colectivos among the Venezuelan population. The findings reveal a substantial lack of legitimacy for both the police and Colectivos. Moreover, the study identifies a moderate positive correlation between attitudes towards the police and Colectivos, indicating that individuals who view the police negatively are more likely to hold negative views towards Colectivos as well. Regarding the individual socio-economic variables, only political alignment was found to influence perceptions of legitimacy, whereby Chavistas viewed both polices and Colectivos more positively than non-chavistas. Additionally, the analysis of territorial differences reveals variations in public opinion towards these groups across different states. The findings highlight a concerning situation for Venezuelan population about the legitimacy of state armed forces and the potential consequences of a failed state. The perception of inefficacy of state armed forces, like the police, can leave the population feeling unprotected and vulnerable. They also indicate a potential fertile ground for non-state armed forces to control and exercise violence. The authors argue that efforts should be made to restore the state’s monopoly of violence in a legitimate and effective manner, while considering the underlying political factors and geographical differences that shape public attitudes towards armed actors. By addressing these issues, steps can be taken towards fostering a sense of security and trust among the Venezuelan population.

References

o ARIAS, E. D. Criminal Enterprises and Governance in Latin America and the Caribbean. New York: Cambridge University Press 2018.
o BATES, D.; MARTIN MAECHLER, B.; BOLKER, S. W. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), p. 1-48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
o BEETHAM, D. (1991) The legitimation of Power. London: Palgrave-Macmillan
o BEETHAM, D. (2012) ‘Political Legitimacy’ in Political Sociology, Amenta, E.; Nash, K. and Scott, A. (eds). Oxford: Willey-Blackwell,’. P. 120-129
o BEVIR, M. Goverance. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2012.
o BLACK, D. (1998) The Social Structrure of Right and Wrong. Revised Edition, San Diego, Academic Press
o BLATTMAN, C.; DUNCAN, G.; BLESSING, B. and TOBÓN, S. (2022) Gang Rule: Understanding and Countering Criminal Governance. Becker Friedman Institute, University of Chicago, Working Paper · NO. 2022-85-June
o BRICEÑO-LEÓN, R. (2015) ‘El Estado y el Delito Organizado: exceso y vacio normativo’. Delito Organizado, Mercados ilegales y Democracia en Venezuela , Briceño-León, R., & A. Camardiel (eds) Caracas: Alfa. p. 39-62
o BRICEÑO-LEÓN, R. (2022) Feral cities and the normative dimension of violence: Caracas and the Latin American city Urban Violence. In Urban Violence, Resilience and Security. Governance Responses in the Global South. Edited by Michael R. Glass, Taylor B. Seybolt and Phil Williams. London, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.101-119.
o BRICEÑO-LEÓN, R., BARREIRA, C., & DE AQUINO, J. P. D. (2022). “The “Facções” of Fortaleza and “Colectivos” of Caracas: Two Models of Criminal Governance”. Dilemas, 15: p. 51–77.
o FELDMANN, A. E. and LUNA, J. P. (2022) Criminal Governance and the Crisis of Contemporary Latin American States. Annual Review of Sociology. 2022. 48, p. 441–461
o FUKUYAMA, F. (2004) State-Building. Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press.
o HADLER, M. (2004). Die Mehrebenen-Analyse. Ihre praktische Anwendung und theoretische Annahmen. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 29(1),p. 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-004-0003-9
o HECK, R. H., THOMAS, S. L., & TABATA, L. N. (2010). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS. Routledge.
o HOBBES, T. Leviatán o la materia, forma y poder de una república eclesiástica y civil. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1984.
o HOX, J. (2010). Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications, Second Edition. Routledge.
o LANGER, W. (2010). Mehrebenenanalyse mit Querschnittsdaten. In C. Wolf & H. Best (Eds.), Handbuch Der Sozialwissenschaftlichen Datenanalyse. p. 741–774. Springer.
o LEIBNIZ. G.W. Political Writings. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1988.
o LESSSING, B. Conceptualizing Criminal Governance, Perspectives on Politics, 19(3),p. 854-873, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592720001243
o NAIM, M. & TORO, F. (2019) El suicidio de Venezuela. Lecciones de un estado fallido. Foreing Affairs, January 4, 2019. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/venezuela/2019-01-04/el-suicidio-de-venezuela
o ROSSEAU, J.J. (2007) Contrato Social. Madrid, Espasa Calpe.
o ROTBERG, R. (2013) Failed State. The Oxford Companion to Comparative Politics (vol 2), Joel Krieger (ed), Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 383-389.
o VILLA, R. y PIMENTA, M. S. (2019) Violent non-State Actors and New Forms of Governance: Exploring the Colombian and Venezuelan Border Zone. Journal of Human Security, 15 (1), p. 6–18
o WEBER, M. From Max Weber. Essays in Sociology, New York: Oxford University Press, 1972
o ZUBILLAGA, V., HANSON, R. & SÁNCHEZ, F. (2022) Criminal Governance in Times of Post-Chávez Revolution and Questioned Legitimacy: A Look at Different Territorial Orders and Armed Actors in Caracas. Dilemas, 15, p. 529-558. https://doi.org/10.4322/dilemas.v15esp4.52528
Official, institutional and press documents:
o ACNUR (2022) Situación de Venezuela. Llamamiento de emergencia.
o https://www.acnur.org/emergencias/situacion-de-venezuela
o Corte Penal Internacional-ICC-CPI (2023) Situación en la República Bolivariana de Venezuela. https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/RelatedRecords/0902ebd180441579.pdf
o Fundación Alexis Vive, s-f, a Colectivoalexisvive, Quiénes somos. https://colectivoalexisvive.es.tl/QUIENES-SOMOS.htm
o Fundaredes (2021) Apure: cronología de un conflicto armado en la frontera venezolana. https://www.fundaredes.org/2021/04/20/apure-cronologia-de-un-conflicto-armado-en-la-frontera-venezolana/
o Insight Crime (2021) La Guerra subsidiaria en Apure. https://es.insightcrime.org/investigaciones/guerra-subsidiaria-apure/
o La Piedrita. (s.f.). nuestra-historia. Recuperado el 23 de mayo de 2021, de colectivolapiedrita: https://colectivolapiedrita.es.tl/Nuestra-Historia.htm
o Provea (2019) Marino Alvarado: Colectivos paramilitares se afianzan con un marco jurídico que les ampara. https://provea.org/actualidad/marino-alvarado-colectivos-paramilitares-se-afianzan-con-un-marco-juridico-que-les-ampara/
o R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/
o R4V (20223) RMRP2023-2024. Plan de respuesta para refugiados y migrantes, https://www.r4v.info/es/rmrp2023-2024
o UNOCHA (2023) Informe de situación Venezuela 2023 https://reports.unocha.org/es/country/venezuela-bolivarian-republic-of/