Automated system of court enforcement proceedings as element of information provision for compulsory enforcement of decisions

Sistema automatizado de procedimientos judiciales de ejecución como elemento de suministro de información para la realización obligatoria de resoluciones

• Nataliia Sergiienko Security Service of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6681-5961
• Serhii Suslin Security Service of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3155-958X
• Vira Pyrohovska National University of Biotechnology and Nature Management, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3339-8417
• Volodymyr Serha "National Joint Stock Company "Naftogaz of Ukraine", Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6360-7879
• Kotovych Ihor State tax university, Irpin, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0325-7218

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4177.36

Keywords: judicial enforcement proceedings, compulsory enforcement of a decision, automated system of judicial enforcement proceedings, provision of information, compulsory decisions

Abstract

The aim of the article was to suggest ways to improve the legislation regulating the scope of operation of the automated system of judicial enforcement proceedings, in order to increase the effectiveness of enforced execution of decisions while respecting human rights. The methodology of the article was based on the application of the following methods of scientific cognition: analytical, deductive, hermeneutic, comparative and synthesis. In addition, the authors analyze the legal regulation of the operation of the automated system of execution of court judgments, as an element of information provision for the forced execution of resolutions and, at the same time, have revealed the gaps in its legal regulation and, consequently, have suggested the ways to eliminate them. It was definitely established that there was no need to amend the legislation concerning the distribution of enforcement documents among private enforcement officers within their districts of jurisdiction. In the conclusions it was offered to improve certain provisions of the Ukrainian legislation regulating the provision of information on compulsory enforcement of decisions, in particular, to give the prosecutor access to information on judicial enforcement proceedings on an equal footing with the parties.

References

CHERNYSH, Roman; PROZOROV, Andrii; TYTARENKO, Yaroslav; MATSIUK, Vitalii; LEBEDEV, Olexander. 2022. “Legal and organizational aspects of destructive information impact counteracting: the experience of Ukraine and the European Union” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 54, No. 11, pp. 169-177.

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UKRAINE. 1997. October 30, Decision No. 5-zp, based on the constitutional submission of the Articles 3, 23, 31, 47, 48 of the Law of Ukraine “On Information” and the Art. 12 of the Law of Ukraine “On Prosecutor’s Office” (case of K.H. Ustymenko). Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v005p710-97#Text.Consultation date: 24/01/2023.

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UKRAINE. 2012. Decision No. 2-rts/2012 1-9/2012, case based on the constitutional submission of Zhashkiv District Council of Cherkasy Region regarding the official interpretation of the provisions of Part 1 and Part 2 of the Art. 32, Parts 2 and 3 of the Art. 34 of the Constitution of Ukraine. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v002p710-12#Text. Consultation date: 24/01/2023.

DATA PROTECTION ACT. 2018. Available online. In: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/section/3. Consultation date: 24/01/2023.

DIDENKO,Larysa;SPASOVA,Ekaterina;MYKHAILOVA,Iryna;TSERKOVNA, Olena, YARMAKI, Volodymyr. 2022. “Peculiarities of personal data protection according to European and Ukrainian legislation” In: Cuestiones Políticas. Vol. 40, No. 74, pp. 585-606.

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL: REGULATION. 2016. (EU) of 27 April, 2016 No. 679 of the on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (GDPR). Available online. In: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679&from=EN. Consultation date: 24/01/2023.

HOLOVENKO, Roman; KOTLIAR, Dmytro; NESTERENKO, Oksana; SHEVCHENKO, Taras. 2012. Law of Ukraine “On access to public information”: scientific and practical commentary. TsSM. Kyiv, Ukraine.

HORPYNIUK, Oksana. 2014. Information privacy and its protection from criminal encroachments in Ukraine: monograph. BONA. Lviv, Ukraine.

KRUPNOVA, Liubov. 2017. “Theoretical and Legal Characteristics of the Stages of Administrative Procedure to Initiate Executive Lawsuit” In: Bulletin of Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E. Didorenko. Vol. 79, No. 3, pp. 123-131.

LATA, Natalya; MARTYNIUK, Serhii; MINKA, Tetiana; ILCHYSHYN, Nadiya; YURAKH, Vitalii. 2022. “Administrative and legal security of public information services in the activities of bodies of legislative and judicial power” In: Cuestiones Políticas. Vol. 40, No. 72, pp. 656-669.

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE OF UKRAINE. 2016. August 5. Order No. 2432/5. Regulations on the Automated System of Court Enforcement Proceedings. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1126-16#Text. Consultation date: 24/01/2023.

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE OF UKRAINE. 2019. January 10. Order No. 79/5. “Charter of the State Enterprise «National Information Systems”. Available online. In: https://nais.gov.ua/files/general/2019/01/18/20190118164841-63.pdf.Consultationdate:24/01/2023.

REKOTOV, Petro; NIKITENKO, Viktor; KORSHYKOVA, Tetiana; ZHEREBKO, Oleksandr; SAMOILENKO, Ihor. 2022. “Protection of the rights and legitimate interests of the individual in a hybrid war” In: Cuestiones Políticas. Vol. 40. No. 72, pp. 901-918.

SNIDEVYCH, Oleksandr. 2019. “Openness as a principle for building enforcement procedural form” In: Law and Society, No. 3, pp. 124-128.

SUPREME COURT: RULING DATED FROM. 2020. April 16, case No. 804/4069/17. Available online. In: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88815240. Consultation date: 24/01/2023.

SUPREME COURT: RULING. 2022. Dated from June 7, case No. 761/20750/13- ц. Available online. In: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/104813449. Consultation date: 24/01/2023.

THE SIXTH ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OF APPEAL: RULING DATED FROM JULY 8. 2020. Case No. 826/13619/18. Available online. In: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/90261557. Consultation date: 24/01/2023.

THE SIXTH ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OF APPEAL: RULING DATED FROM JULY 9. 2020. case No. 640/3859/19. Available online. In: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/90299334. Consultation date: 24/01/2023.

VERBA-SYDOR, Olha; VOROBEL՚, Uliana. 2016. “Institution of Private Executors in Ukraine: Legal Regulation Improvement Proposals” In: Scientific Bulletin of Lviv State University of Internal Affairs. Series Law. No. 1, pp. 86-94.

VERKHOVNA RADA OF UKRAINE. 1992. October 2. Law of Ukraine No. 2657-XII “On Information”. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2657-12#Text. Consultation date: 24/01/2023.

VERKHOVNA RADA OF UKRAINE. 2016. June 2. Law of Ukraine No. 1404-VIII “On Enforcement Proceedings”. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1404-19. Consultation date: 24/01/2023.

VERKHOVNA RADA OF UKRAINE, 1996. June 28. Constitution of Ukraine. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96-вр#Text. Consultation date: 24/01/2023.

ZOLOTARENKO, Vadym. 2016. “The principle of discretionary actions of participants of the enforcement proceedings” In: Civil Procedural Thought. No. 4, pp. 38-41.