Court-initiated call for evidence in the Ukrainian economic process

Reclamo de pruebas por iniciativa del tribunal en el proceso económico de Ucrania

• Artem Selivon University of State Fiscal Service of Ukraine, Irpin, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9196-0714
• Nataliia Nykytchenko University of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine, Irpin, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9545-1434
• Oleksiy Oderii Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6999-4387
• Olena Korotun Northern Commercial Court of Appeal, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2328-6913
• Serhii Podkopaev National Academy of Law Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5281-3981

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4177.23

Keywords: evidentiary initiative, evidentiary claim, economic court, economic process, economic procedural law

Abstract

The purpose of the article was to study the actual problems of obtaining evidence on the initiative of the court in the economic process and, at the same time, to substantiate the proposals for reforming the economic procedural legislation of Ukraine. In the research process were used methods of general and special, namely: historical, comparative legal, synergistic, structural systemic, analysis and synthesis, logical and generalization method. It has been shown that evidence is an important part of the judicial process. It is emphasized that the role of the court in ensuring a prompt and thorough consideration of the case cannot be passive. It is concluded that the court, while maintaining objectivity and impartiality, must assist the participants in the trial in exercising their rights, prevent any kind of abuse and take measures to fulfil its judicial duties, as a condition of possibility for the maintenance of the rule of law.

References

BABENKO, Viktoriia. 2007. Proving within commercial proceedings”. Thesis for a Candidate’s degree of Economic Science (PhD). Academy of Labour, Social Relations and Tourism. Kyiv, Ukraine.

BAULIN, Oleh. 2005. Burden of proving while hearing civil cases. Lomonosov Moscow State University. Moscow, Russia.

BILETSKAYA, Liudmyla. 2013. “The proof in the economic proceedings of Ukraine: on the way to forming judicial standards” In: National school of judges of Ukraine. Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 58-64.

BUTYRSKYI, Andrii. 2019. In: Judicial appeal. Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 89-97.

DEMYDOVA, Mariia; VASYLCHENKO, Tetiana. 2016. “Preventing the court from becoming a hostage of the parties in the case” In: Law and Business. No. 17 (1263). Available online. In: https://zib.com.ua/ua/123249-yak_ne_dopustiti_togo_abi_sud_stav_zaruchnikom_storin_u_spra.html. Consultation date: 18/12/2022.

DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THE MIDDLE EAST BY DLA PAPER. 2022. Available online. In: https://www.dlapiperintelligence. com/dispute-resolution-in-the-middle-east. Consultation date: 18/12/2022.

DZHEPA, Yuliia. 2017. “Trends in legislation in economic justice under integration Ukraine” In: Actual problems of native jurisprudence. Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 47-51.

IZAROVA, Iryna; VIBRATE, Vigita; FLEJSZAR, Radoslaw. 2018. “Case Management in the Civil Court Procedure: A Comparative Study of the Legislation of Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine” In: Law of Ukraine. No. 10, pp. 129-146.

KALAMAIKO, Andrii. 2019. “Judicial evidence and the role of the court in the new edition of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine” In: Legal Novels. No 9, pp. 46-54.

KOMAROV, V. 2011. “Civil process in a global context” In: Law of Ukraine. No 10, pp. 22-45.

KOROTENKO, Valerii. 2006. “Constitutional adversarial principle within arbitration proceedings” In: Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series “Law”. No 13, pp. 269-272.

LANG, Petr. 2018. “The nature and principles of evidence in arbitration proceedings” In: Legal science. No. 4, pp. 87-92.

LILLY, Graham. 1996. An Introduction to the Law of Evidence (3th edition). West Group. St. Paul, USA.

LUSPENIK, Dmytro. 2019. “Proving within civil proceedings: new provisions in the Civil Procedural Code and the reason that the court is empowered to demand evidence” In: Judicial and legal newspaper. Available online. In: https://sud.ua/ru/news/blog/132494-dokazuvannya-u-tsivilnomu- protsesi-scho-novogo-u-tspk-ta-chomu-sud-nadileniy-pravom- vitrebuvannya-dokaziv-ba6687. Consultation date: 18/12/2022.

MARTYSIUK, Evgenii. 2001. “The principle of competitiveness in the arbitration process” In: Arbitration practice. No. 2, pp. 40-48.

MELEKH, Liubomyra. 2016. “The legal description of evidence and proof institute foreign countries” In: Bulletin of Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E. Didorenko. No. 1, pp. 252-261.

OSOKYNA, Galyna. 2013. Civil process. General Part: textbook. (3d edition). Norma. Moscow, Russia.

RYZHENKO, Iryna; RYBAS, Alla. 2016. “Problems and directions of improvement of economic procedural legislation in terms of judicial reform” In: Judicial and Investigative Practice in Ukraine. No. 1, pp. 39- 45.

SELIVON, Artem. 2021. “Current problems of demanding evidence at the initiative of the court in arbitration proceedings” In: Collection of materials of the II Tax Congress. Pp. 531-536.

SELIVON, Artem; NYKYTCHENKO, Nataliya. 2021. “Responsibility for failure to notify the court about impossibility to present evidence demanded by the court, or failure to submit such evidence without clear reason” In: Actual problems of domestic jurisprudence. No. 3, pp. 87-93.

SKLANSKY, David: ROTH, Andrea. 2020. Evidence: Cases, Commentary, and Problems (Connected eBook with Study Center). Aspen Publishing (5th edition). (Aspen Casebook). Boston, USA.

STEPHEN, Anna. 2015. “The concept of judicial proof in civil proceedings” In: Journal of the Academy of Advocacy of Ukraine. Vol. 8, No. 1 (26), pp. 64-72.

TEREMETSKYI, Vladyslav; DULIBA, Yevheniia; DROZDOVA, Olena; ZHUKOVSKA, Liudmyla; SIVASH, Olena; DZIUBA, Iurii. 2021. “Access to Justice and Legal aid for Vulnerable Groups: New Challenges Caused by the Сovid-19 Pandemic” In: Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues. Vol. 24, Special Issue 1: Business Ethics and Regulatory Compliance, pp. 01-11.

TEREMETSKYI, Vladyslav; PETROVSKYI, Andrii. 2021. “Optimization of subjects of proof in the civil procedure of Ukraine in the context of the legal status of a specialist in a certain field of knowledge” In: Actual Problems of Law. Vol. 25, No 1, pp. 107-113.

TREUSHNIKOV, Mikhail. 2004. Court evidences. Gorodets. Moscow, Russia.

VASYLCHENKO, Tetiana. 2017. Novels of Institute of Evidence in Economic Legal Proceedings. In: Law of Ukraine. No. 9, pp. 146-153.

VATAMANIUK, Iryna. 2011. “Problems and Prospects of Economic Procedural Legislation Reformation” Scientific Herald of Chernivtsi University. Series: Jurisprudence. No. 604, pp. 64-67.

VEDENEEV, Evgenii. 2001. Role of the court on proving in the case within Russian civil and arbitration proceedings. Arbitration and Civil Procedure. No. 2, pp. 33-41.