The Franchise Agreement in International Trade: its Advantages and Disadvantages

Keywords: franchise agreement, franchisor, franchisee, franchise network, trademark

Abstract

The aim of the article is to analyze the implications of the franchise agreement in international trade. One of the contracts that is usually registered after the appearance and registration of property rights, and especially after the development of trademark rights, is the franchise agreement. A franchise agreement is a contract entered into between the franchisor and the franchisee as the owner of the intellectual property rights. In other words, the franchisee often uses trademark rights and intellectual property rights owned by the franchisor, which have a limited duration. It is concluded that, in franchise agreement, there is a right to enforce the franchisor’s business method, which is implemented within the network (this method includes the use of intellectual property rights and know-how). This contract has detailed terms and is closely related to intellectual property rights and competition rights. The franchise must be distinguished from the distribution contract, the concessionaire, and the license. Under this agreement, the franchisee enters the franchise network and agrees to use the franchisor’s method of negotiation and pay royalty-free payments instead.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mohammad Mehdipour, Islamic Azad University

Assist. Prof, Department of Law, Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran

Parviz Bagheri, Ilam University

Assist. Prof. Department of Law, Ilam University, Ilam. Iran

References

ACT, CONSUMERS LEGAL REMEDIES. 1995. California Civil Code.

AHLSTRAND, Karin. 2000. Vertical distribution agreements under EC competition law-background and the new Block Exemption Regulation.

AMERI, F. 2010. “Treaties overseeing government cooperation and their role in technology transfer” In: International Legal Journal. No. 43, p. 70.

ANDERMAN, STEVEN D (Ed.). 2007. The interface between intellectual property rights and competition policy. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.

BASSIOUNI, M. Cherif. 1999. «Negotiating the Treaty of Rome on the establishment of an International Criminal Court» In: Cornell Int’l LJ. Vol. 32, p443.

BURNS, Charlotte. 2004. “Codecision and the European Commission: a study of declining influence?” In: Journal of European Public Policy. Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-18.

CARR, Indira; STONE, Peter. 2013. International trade law. Routledge. London, UK.

CASSESE, Antonio; GAETA, Paola; JONES, John RWD. 2002. The Rome statute of the international criminal court: A commentary. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK.

CINI, Michelle. 1997. «Administrative culture in the European Commission: The cases of competition and environment.» In At the Heart of the Union, pp. 71-88. Palgrave Macmillan. London, UK.

COOK, Jeffrey J; AZNAR, Alexandra; GRUNWALD, Bryn; HOLM, Alison. 2021. «Hand me the franchise agreement: municipalities add another policy tool to their clean energy toolbox» In: Solar Energy. Vol. 214, pp. 62-71.

CALDERON-MONGE, Esther. 2018. Personality Traits of the Partners and Performance in the Franchise Agreement. Inside the Mind of the Entrepreneur. Springer, Cham.

CRAIG, Paul. 2010. The Lisbon Treaty: law, politics, and treaty reform. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK.

ENTESSAR, Nader. 1988. «Criminal law and the legal system in revolutionary Iran.» BC Third World LJ 8. 91.

GINSBURG, Jane C. 2002. “The concept of authorship in comparative copyright law” In: DePaul L. Rev. Vol. 52, p.1063.

DUFFY, John F. 2002. Harmony and diversity in global patent law. College of William & Mary Law School. Williamsburg, USA.

KATOUZIAN, Homa. 1980. Historical Perspectives: From Political Economy to Positive Economics. Ideology and Method in Economics. Palgrave. London, UK.

KIOUSSI, Sofia. 2008. Quality design, construction and development enterprises: Exploring the model and marketing strategies for integration. Diss. UCL (University College London). London, UK.

MAULIDIANA, Lina. 2017. «Implementation Of Franchise Agreement Perspective In Contract Law» In: International Journal of Social Sciences and Development. Pp. 61-74.

NUGENT, Neill; RHINARD, Mark. 2015. The European commission. Macmillan International Higher Education. London, UK.

RICKETSON, Sam; GINSBURG, Jane C. 2006. International copyright and neighboring rights: The Berne convention and beyond. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK.

SECKELMANN, Margrit. 2011. «From the Paris Convention (1883) to the TRIPS Agreement (1994): The History of the International Patent Agreements as a History of Propertisation?.» In: Comparativ. Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 46-63.

SINGER, Joseph William. 1982. «The legal rights debate in analytical jurisprudence from Bentham to Hohfeld» In: Wisconsin Law Review. Vol. 1982, No. 6, pp. 975-890

THE EUROPEAN FRANCHISE FEDERATION (EFF). 2016. EFF European Code of Ethics for Franchising.

TRIASIH, Dharu; MURYATI, Dewi Tuti. 2020. «Legal Protection of the Parties in the Franchise Agreement.» The 2nd International Conference of Law, Government and Social Justice (ICOLGAS 2020). Atlantis Press. Paris, France.

VON BAR, Christian. 2002. «Communication on European contract law: joint response of the Commission on European Contract Law and the Study Group on a European Civil Code» In: European Review of Private Law. Vol. 10, No. 2.

WIRTÉN, Eva Hemmungs. 2010. «Colonial Copyright, Postcolonial Publics: The Berne Convention and the 1967 Stockholm Diplomatic Conference Revisited» In: SCRIPTed. No. 7, pp. 532-550.
Published
2021-07-09
How to Cite
Mehdipour, M., & Bagheri, P. (2021). The Franchise Agreement in International Trade: its Advantages and Disadvantages. Political Questions, 39(69), 296-316. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3969.17
Section
Derecho Público