Institution of Complicity in a Crime: Comparative-Legal Interpretation

  • Gennady Nazarenko Southwest State University
  • Alexandra Sitnikova Southwest State University
  • Andrey Baybarin Southwest State University
Keywords: institution of complicity in a crime, criminal design traits, differentiation of accomplices, innovative legislative and textual approach, comparative legal interpretation

Abstract

The objective of the study was to identify the design patterns and distinctive features of the institution of complicity in a crime in certain criminal laws. The methodology was based on the use   of legislative interpretation operations and techniques such as the hermeneutics of criminal texts, which allows to identify the structural, constructive, and substantive features of the rules on complicity in a crime. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the textological approach of the criminal-legal regulations of the institution of complicity. This approach allows to interpret the standards in a comparative aspect, taking into account the deep level of their construction.  Among the results obtained  are:(1) the inclusion of complicity rules in other criminal law institutions is an unjustified design technique; (2) the absence of a complex of titles in the institution of complicity reduces the level of quality of this institution; (3) the presence of definitive rules in the institution of complicity significantly increases its quality; (4) the differentiation of accomplices in crime should not be excessive and arbitrary; (5) the rules on attempted complicity in a crime increase the preventive potential of criminal law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Gennady Nazarenko, Southwest State University

Department of Criminal Law of the Southwest State University, Kursk, Russian Federation. ORCID ID: 

Alexandra Sitnikova, Southwest State University

Department of Criminal Law of the Southwest State University, Kursk, Russian Federation. ORCID: 

Andrey Baybarin, Southwest State University

Department of Criminal Law of the Southwest State University, Kursk, Russian Federation. ORCID: 

References

AIZPURUA, Eva; APPLEGATE, Brandon; BOLIN, Riane; VUK, Mateja; OUELLETTE, Heather M. 2020. “The sins of the child: Public opinion about parental responsibility for juvenile crime” In: Children and Youth Services Review. Vol. 114(С), 105023.

BODUSZEK, Daniel; DEBOWSKA, Agata; SHARRATT, Kathryn; MCDERMOTT, Danielle; SHERRETTS, Nicole; WILLMOTT, Domonoc; POPIOLEK, Katarzyna; HYLAND, Philip. 2020. “Pathways between types of crime and criminal social identity: A network approach” In: Journal of Criminal Justice. Available online. In: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047235220302440.

DURRANT, Russil. 2020. “Evolutionary theory and the classification of crime” In: Aggression and Violent Behavior. Available online. In: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359178920301531. Consultation date: 10/09/2020.

EVANS, Caroline; STALKER, Katie Cotter; BROWN, Mary Ellen. 2021. “A systematic review of crime/violence and substance use prevention programs” In: Aggression and Violent Behavior. Vol. 56, 101513.

FERNÁNDEZ-CAMPOY, Juan Miguel; AGUILAR-PARRA, José Manuel. 2017. “Study to Investigate the Links between Crimes Committed by Youth Offenders and the Nature of their Migratory Movements” In. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 237, pp. 505-510.

GUNADI, Christian. 2020. “Does immigrant legalization affect crime? Evidence from deferred action for childhood arrivals in the United States” In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. Vol. 178, pp. 327-353.

HERNÁNDEZ, Wilson. 2019. “Do criminal justice reforms reduce crime and perceived risk of crime? A quasi-experimental approach in Peru” In: International Review of Law and Economics. Vol. 58(C), pp. 89-100.

HEWITT, Ashley; CHOPIN, Julien; BEAUREGARD, Eric. 2020. “Offender and victim 'journey-to-crime': Motivational differences among stranger rapists” In: Journal of Criminal Justice. Vol. 69(C), 101707.

KIRILLOVA, E.A; BLINKOV, O.E; OGNEVA, N.I; VRAZHNOV, A.S; SERGEEVA, N.V. 2020. “Artificial intelligence as a new category of civil law” In: Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 91-98.

RAMAKERS, Anke; AALTONEN, Mikko; MARTIKAINEN, Pekka. 2020. “A closer look at labor market status and crime among a general population sample of young men and women” In: Advances in Life Course Research. Vol. 43, 100322.

SUONPÄÄ, Karoliina; AALTONEN, Mikko; VAN DER GEEST, Victor. 2020. “Crime and income trajectories preceding lethal and non-lethal violence” In: Journal of Criminal Justice. Vol. 68.

TRONCOSO, Fredy; WEBER, Richard. 2020. “Integrating relations and criminal background to identifying key individuals in crime networks” In: Decision Support Systems. Vol. 139.

VAUGHN, Paige E. 2020. “The effects of devaluation and solvability on crime clearance” In: Journal of Criminal Justice. Vol. 68(C), 101657.
Published
2021-03-07
How to Cite
Nazarenko, G., Sitnikova, A., & Baybarin, A. (2021). Institution of Complicity in a Crime: Comparative-Legal Interpretation. Political Questions, 39(68), 520-530. Retrieved from https://www.produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/cuestiones/article/view/35433
Section
Derecho Público