Revista
de la
Universidad
del Zulia
Fundada en 1947
por el Dr. Jesús Enrique Lossada
DEPÓSITO LEGAL ZU2020000153
Esta publicación científica en formato digital
es continuidad de la revista impresa
ISSN 0041-8811
E-ISSN 2665-0428
Ciencias
Sociales
y Arte
Año 14 41
Septiembre - Diciembre 2023
Tercera Época
Maracaibo-Venezuela
REVISTA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA. época. Año 14, N° 41, 2023
Tatiana V. Portnova// Methodology of Modern Theatrical Art in the Formation... 801-812
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.41.45
801
Methodology of Modern Theatrical Art in the Formation of an Actor’s
Emotional Nature and Peculiarities of His or Her Stage Perception
Tatiana V. Portnova*
ABSTRACT
In the majority of Russian cities a theater, a cultural space, which has taken the close
attention of the wide audience in recent years, is located not far from the central square or
directly on it. Theater can be attractive for people’s leisure activities, take central or
peripheral position in the cultural life of a city, give successful and not quite successful
performances, but it will definitely remain the place whose life is rather little known about.
In this article the author tries to scientifically analyze and critically conceptualize the
problematics of the methodology of modern theatrical art in the formation of an actor’s
emotional nature and peculiarities of his or her stage perception. The aim of this research is
to reveal and analyze the essence of an actor’s emotional nature conjugated into the modern
epoch with the performative practices influencing the condition of traditional theater and
personal status of an actor. The methodology of the research includes a systematic
approach and a method of comparative analysis applied to the actor's nature of the artist,
which developed by the XX century, which has now covered other professional spheres of a
person, thus changing the value orientations of the actor's stage performance.
KEYWORDS: Modern theater, theatrical art, actor’s emotional nature, stage perception.
*Doctor of Art History, Professor of the Department of Art History The Kosygin State University of
Russia,Moscow, Russian Federation ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4221-3923. Email:
infotatiana-p@mail.ru
Recibido: 31/05/2023 Aceptado: 19/07/2023
REVISTA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA. época. Año 14, N° 41, 2023
Tatiana V. Portnova// Methodology of Modern Theatrical Art in the Formation... 801-812
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.41.45
802
Metodología del arte teatral moderno en la formación de la naturaleza
emocional del actor y las peculiaridades de su percepción escénica
RESUMEN
En la mayoría de las ciudades rusas, no lejos de la plaza central o directamente sobre ella,
hay un teatro, un espacio cultural que en los últimos años ha atraído la atención de un gran
público. El teatro puede ser atractivo para el ocio de la gente, ocupar una posición central o
periférica en la vida cultural de una ciudad, ofrecer representaciones exitosas y no tan
exitosas, pero seguramente seguirá siendo un lugar cuya vida se conoce poco. En este
artículo el autor intenta analizar científicamente y conceptualizar críticamente la
problemática de la metodología del arte teatral moderno en la formación de la naturaleza
emocional del actor y las peculiaridades de su percepción escénica. El objetivo de esta
investigación es revelar y analizar la esencia de la naturaleza emocional del actor conjugada
en la época moderna con las prácticas performativas que influyen en la condición del teatro
tradicional y el estatus personal del actor. La metodología de la investigación incluye un
enfoque sistemático y un método de análisis comparativo aplicado a la naturaleza del actor-
artista, que se desarrolló en el siglo XX, y que ahora ha abarcado otras esferas profesionales
del hombre, cambiando así las orientaciones valorativas del actor.
PALABRAS CLAVE: Teatro moderno, arte teatral, naturaleza emocional del actor,
percepción escénica.
Introduction
Theater originated from ritual games and god worshipping cult, having formed the
initial link underlying performance acting and event. The performance independence
arose in the cultural phenomenon of ancient Roman theater already. The superfluous
acting vitality and transforming character of the event conditioned the actors’ liminal
position among medieval communities and their spatial mobility. The actor’s figure
manifested the covert cultural conflict between the humorous (overt) and rational (covert)
principles of the medieval culture, between folk and elite culture and immanently
contained it in itself. In the modern period the actor’s emotional culture occupied the
position “subject without a place” in the social-political and social-economic coordinate
system already.
The erasing of boundaries between the theater-goer’s private world and actors’
community, at first sight, did not leave the unknown and invisible territories like theater.
REVISTA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA. época. Año 14, N° 41, 2023
Tatiana V. Portnova// Methodology of Modern Theatrical Art in the Formation... 801-812
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.41.45
803
Actors willingly demonstrated their professional and private life. In this context, the
anthology of theatrical subculture was more urgent and important for understanding the
modern culture, the actors’ community itself, understanding of “visibility modes” in totally
visible modern culture, in “performance society”.
The following periodicals were a valuable information source: “Actor”, Almanac of
Imperial Theaters”, Theater and Art”, Theatrical City”, “Petersburg Theatrical Magazine”,
Theater”. The consideration of the actors’ community as a cultural phenomenon, rather
stable and independent, historically long-tem, allows using these periodicals as references,
referring to them through the lens of anthropological methodology. We should point out
that this approach is congenial for us.
If under acting we understand not only a free activity, like some form, which
comprises the content, but acting as an independent phenomenon, it has own meaning
different from the meaning to serve for filling with some content. The aesthetics fills acting
just enough as long as it has been existing beyond the functionality, as long as it has been
serving itself and nothing else. Let us assume that theater most brightly embodies the
aesthetic side of acting.
The purpose of this study is to identify and analyze the essence of the emotional
nature of the artist, coupled in the modern era with performance practices that affect the
state of the traditional theater and the personal position of the artist.
1. Literature overview
The issues of defining the theatrical art and theater history are considered in the
researches (Badiou, 2011; Gurevich, 2012) and others.
The book “Rhapsody for theater” by a distinguished French philosopher Alain Badiou is
based on his article for the journal “L'Art du theater” published at Chaillot National Theater
by a famous theatrical director Antoine Viteze in 1985-1989. Badiou brings up the issues of
the relations between theater, as the type of art, and the state, politics, philosophy,
psychoanalysis and cinematograph, gives philosophical interpretation of theatrical art
mastery and its ethics, as well as the peculiarities of dramaturgical texts differentiating
them from other literary works.
The book by a known Russian literary and theatrical critic, translator and publicist
L.Ya. Gurevich History of Russian theatrical daily routine: From mid-XVII to early XIX
REVISTA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA. época. Año 14, N° 41, 2023
Tatiana V. Portnova// Methodology of Modern Theatrical Art in the Formation... 801-812
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.41.45
804
century” narrates about the history of theatrical art in Russia in the middle of XVII
beginning of XIX centuries an important period of the Russian theater establishment and
formation of its daily routine. The author sets himself the task of demonstrating different
sides of theatrical life of that period and their connection with the course of history, with
its particular events. The work investigates social, political and cultural conditions, in
which the theater was developing, artistic demands of the society, different organizational
forms of the theater in different social layers and in different periods of time.
Sociological aspects of cultural values of the human society are demonstrated in the
articles (Belousova, Melnik, Rimskaya, 2009; Deleuze, Anti-Oedipus, 2017; Zhuravleva,
Nestik, 2011; Massumi, 2019).
The article by М.М. Belousova, Yu.М. Melnik, V.P. Rimskaya “Methodology of the
investigation of subcultures in social and humanitarian sciences (on the example of youth
subculture)” considers the methodological aspects of investigating subcultures in the space
of social and humanitarian knowledge. It is pointed out that the correct methodological use
of the concept “subculture” assumes that any system of culture suggests the subsystem
stratification, availability of substructures and subcultures. The dominating culture itself
can be presented as the system of subcultures.
The research by А.L. Zhuravleva, Т.А. Nestik “Group reflexivity: Main approaches
and perspectives of investigations” contains the results of theoretical analysis, in which the
main approaches to studying the group reflexivity in modern social and organizational
psychology are revealed. The social and psychological factors defining the group ability to
reflexivity and attitude to it are singled out and grouped. Personal, interpersonal, group,
intergroup and organizational ones are given among those.
Performative practices were the subject of attention in the articles (Goldberg, 2015:
Lipovetsky, Beumers, 2012; Krivtsova, 2009; Nikolaenko, 2014).
М. N. Lipovetsky, B. Beumers consider the violation performances: literary and
theatrical experiments of “new drama”. Based on great many theatrical, literary and
cinematographic works belonging to the authors of a so-called “new drama”, the authors
come to the conclusion that violence became some sort of language in the modern Russian
society. It contributes to a human’s self-identity formation: everyday violence stopped
REVISTA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA. época. Año 14, N° 41, 2023
Tatiana V. Portnova// Methodology of Modern Theatrical Art in the Formation... 801-812
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.41.45
805
arousing horror and started to be perceived as an everyday element of modern reality
representation.
From spiritual point, the problem of value orientation of theatrical actors was
considered (Kelle, 2018; Baranichenko, 2018; Petrov, 1997).
“Intellectual and spiritual in culture” is the last work of V. Zh. Kelle, a Soviet and
Russian philosopher, sociologist and historian of science whose works composed the whole
epoch in the domestic social science. Investigating the structural heterogeneity of cultures,
the author sees the availability of intellectual and spiritual principles in the culture of
Western European type. The book describes the intellectual principle (branch) of culture
based on subjective-objective relation, and the spiritual principle reproducing the
subjective-objective relations in culture.
N.V. Baranichenko sets the goal in her dissertation to conduct the cultural-
anthropological and philosophical analysis of the phenomenon of actors’ subculture in the
space of Western European civilization development.
The significance of the research direction chosen by us, as well as the examination of
the experience in the actor’s emotional nature development under the modern conditions of
the society development is proved by a number of contraindications revealed by us as a
result of theoretical analysis and studying of performative practices, similar to a theatrical
performance, which are fixed between:
- acceptance of the need to expand and develop the emotional component of an actor’s
game, not only on the stage, but also in other forms of theatrical performances, and, on the
other hand, the dissolution of professional theater in them;
- lack of understanding of the essence of this problem from the part of leaders of
performance groups and institutions of culture, and the lack of specialized technologies;
- possibilities of axiological approach in developing the emotional culture and
insufficient development of scientific and theoretical aspects in solving the problem.
The aim of this research is to reveal and analyze the essence of an actor’s emotional
nature conjugated into the modern epoch with the performative practices influencing the
condition of traditional theater and personal status of an actor.
The research methodology comprises the system approach to an actor’s emotional
nature formed by XX century covering other professional spheres of a human, thus, having
changed the values of an actor’s stage performance. The methods of interdisciplinary
REVISTA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA. época. Año 14, N° 41, 2023
Tatiana V. Portnova// Methodology of Modern Theatrical Art in the Formation... 801-812
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.41.45
806
analysis and comparative studying of scientific art history, culturological, philosophical and
psychological literature on the research problems appeared to be demanded to define the
performance specifics and its influence on the modern theater, actor’s emotional nature and
his/her stage perception.
2. Results and discussion
The peculiarity of the actor’s domestic emotional nature is connected with its
borrowed character. The initial conflict of acting performative practices by skomorokhs
(wandering actors and minstrels) and Christianity contained the diversified conflict
between chaos and order, freedom and control, acting superfluity and ritual limitation, low
and high culture, paganism and Christianity (Badiou, 2011).
Starting from XVII century a rather long “foreign influence” emerged, which lasted
until XIX century. This allows speaking of the introduction of theatrical actors’ subculture,
in which the religiously marked contraindications were partly removed, and other, social-
economic ones, were actualized. Homo performative” of that period settled down the
conflict between the freedom of acting and need to capitalize the performance. The October
Revolution of 1917 claimed to settle down this contraindication. The actor’s main task was
to enlighten the people’s masses, his/her performative practice was appropriated by the
revolution, ideology and politics.
Thus, the peculiarity of the actor’s domestic emotional nature is connected with its
borrowed character. Between XVII and XIX centuries the actor’s emotional nature was
formed from rather eccentric passion of the elite copying and adopting western values and
practices, including leisure ones, into an independent cultural phenomenon, in which
religiously marked contradictions were partly removed and other, social-economic ones,
were actualized (Gurevich, 2012).
In domestic theatrical performative practices we already find traditional conflicts of
acting performative practices between skomorokhs and Christianity. A rather diversified
conflict between chaos and order, freedom and control, acting superfluity and ritual
limitation, low and high culture, paganism and Christianity was removed. Homo
performative” of that period settled down the conflict between the freedom of acting and
need to capitalize the performance, hence, the reflexivity of the attitude to actors in the
media and memoirs, critical conceptualization of own social and financial status. The actor
REVISTA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA. época. Año 14, N° 41, 2023
Tatiana V. Portnova// Methodology of Modern Theatrical Art in the Formation... 801-812
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.41.45
807
took the liminal position again but in another coordinate system already, more social-
political and social-economic. To some extent, on the cusp of XIX-XX centuries he/she
forestalled by his/her position what we call “precariat” today. Mobile, nomadic, rather
socially and financially vulnerable, artistic an actor already embodied the capitalism
anthropological logic more completely than anyone else. The Soviet state found “the place”
for an actor and defined the task for him/her enlightenment of people and propaganda of
the state ideology.
The Russian actor’s emotional nature has undergone qualitative changes for the
recent decades. Some of them were connected with the performance transformation in
general that was reflected in the key trends of postmodern period: acting character of the
culture, erasing of boundaries, including those between culture and subculture,
penetration of performative practices into different professional media and daily life
(Belousova, Melnik, Rimskaya and Rimsky, 2009).
Despite the significance of the changes, the actor’s domestic emotional nature
preserved its integrity, rather traditional in its practices and mythologems, to which we
refer the mythologem of damned play”, “ghost” of the theater, “great actor” and “great
director”, the mythologem of simplicity of the great”, the mythologem of “theater-goer”,
“role”, “actor’s talent”, “legendary performance”, “theater patron”, “live stage”, the
mythologem of “loyalty” to the theater (Deleuze, 2017).
Its main inhabitants actors who formed a rather closed community dealing with a
specific activity, speaking a special language, preserving own long-standing mythology
were still more unknown. Such closed nature and separateness of actors’ communities were
especially surprising on the background of the cinematography explosive growth and mass
media phenomenon.
The expression of feelings is the performance basis. A skillfully made performance is
an opportunity to maintain the status and competitiveness, and artistic skills are valued
high in many situations and spheres of activity, for example, in politics, teaching and trade.
Let us also address a rather speculative thesis, which we found when analyzing the
performance as the combination of acting and event. Perceived as the combination of two
principles, the performance is presented not only as an ontological or aesthetic
phenomenon but more as an anthropological one. Acting characterized by us (in our
rendering we draw upon B. Massumi’s concept) (Massumi, 2019).
REVISTA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA. época. Año 14, N° 41, 2023
Tatiana V. Portnova// Methodology of Modern Theatrical Art in the Formation... 801-812
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.41.45
808
As a source of viability itself the thing, that can be referred to the understanding of
“naked life” in G. Agamben’s work, collides with the event in А. Badiou’s rendering,
manifesting the truth and “suspending” or “cancelling” the existing being (Badiou, 2011).
Here is the source of performative subject liminality, boundedness. Being on the
boundary made it closer to the priest’s figure in antiquity, in Middle Ages it was pushed out
to the low culture of fun-fair and street space of a free city. In modern period, an actor could
be considered as most proletarian, since what he or she produced could not be appropriated
due to its nature. The event reproduction, possible here and now in chronotope of
performance, cannot be appropriated in principle. Nowadays, the spreading of performative
practices outside the theater threatens the actor, and theater and actor’s emotional nature
become the place of his/her preservation.
A cultural code or sociocode, as understood by М.K. Petrov, developed during long
time and not changing sufficiently, can serve as the feature of the subculture formed. These
are cultural-historical practices and their symbolic expression, not just uniting people into
a community, but also reproducing them as the members of this community. We also find
such code in the actor’s emotional nature. Since the performance production is their
determining activity, one side of which is the audience’s vivid emotional response, the actor
is responsible for attracting attention, including the appearance different from
representatives of other professions. This also refers to behavioral norms called upon
surprising and inducing emotions, that is definitely spread not only onto the performance
time and place but also the rest of the actor’s life (Petrov, 1997).
Transformation is another side of performance. In the terms of Jungian concept we
can speak of trickster archetype, which can fill some anthropological forms or, in М.K.
Petrov’s terms, we can speak of the actor’s sociocode, which is specific by its marginality
and boundedness, not only by periphery (not always by typology), but by peculiar
resistibility, penetrability for other codes, their imitation.
We can assume that the actors’ cultural code was formed with the emergence of
major European theaters, rather stable communities, which allowed not only producing
performance and its symbolic contribution but also conveying it from generation to
generation, depriving it of episodicity. It made it significantly different from wandering
groups whose activities were often episodic, the cast nonpermanent. The skomorokh’s
REVISTA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA. época. Año 14, N° 41, 2023
Tatiana V. Portnova// Methodology of Modern Theatrical Art in the Formation... 801-812
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.41.45
809
semiotic code in Ancient Rus can be taken as an example. The groups of skomorokhs were
also distinguished by specific clothes, masks, musical instruments, etc. However, although
having such bright image, the episodicity of performance production by these groups
problematized the issue of skomorokhs’ community as a professional one. They are more
likely traced back to pagan myth-ritual practices, for which the performance was rather a
form than content (Zhuravlev, Nestik, 2011).
Actors’ communities can be also typologized, singling out the professional one
consisting of actors with professional education. It can be spatially represented by actors of
provincial or metropolitan theaters; the subprofessional community, which comprised
amateur actors without professional education and related to professional community
episodically and partially. The members of that community were rather often localized by
the stage in houses of culture, unspecialized premises (basements, attics, art cafes), street
spaces; near-theater community consisting of people close to artistic environment and
involved into different artistic projects from time to time, though not losing the contact
with the artistic environment.
The presented typologies of the actor’s emotional nature are grouped around the
performance specific “energy center” (and here the analogies with energy understanding in
S. Freud’s psychoanalysis, B. Massumi’s vital energy and А. Badiou’s transforming effect of
Event are appropriate). Performance, in its realization, sets specific spatial-time
boundaries-discontinuities, which deliberately take the subject out of the sphere of trivial
and secular, and “suspend” habitual practices (B. Massumi) in the excess of acting, life
principle that is realized “here and now”, at the moment, during the performance. The
Event, as the power or energy of sense, as well as Acting, last outside it. Here, we take the
liberty to designate it with the capital letter, since it produces performance as a profession
and sets it as a goal in itself, creating both a separate person (and transforming it) and the
whole community, which we call the artistic subculture and define it as the community of
people with the main and single goal to produce performance (Lipovetsky, Beumers, 2012).
Professional mythologems do not only mark the actors’ community but also preserve
it, mark its boundaries. Moreover, the latter are necessary to preserve the community. The
phenomenon of “personal” mythologems superstitions and beliefs speaks of the
appropriation of the whole actors’ mythology by a certain subject, subjectivization of
collective performances, thus verifying their live” character. If the assertion that the myth
REVISTA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA. época. Año 14, N° 41, 2023
Tatiana V. Portnova// Methodology of Modern Theatrical Art in the Formation... 801-812
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.41.45
810
was acted, i.e. the myth is primary and acting is secondary, is the common point of view, the
latter is only the form of the myth existence, then in respect of the actors’ environment this
scheme can be turned over not “the myth is acted” but “acted is the myth”. This is not only
the transposition of words but the reflection of the primary acting, which supports the
myth and creates a new one, even on the level of a separate subject. But the myth also acts
as a symbolic boundary protecting performance itself. It is arranged around acting, its space
(stage and theater itself), time (mythologems marking specific time of theater and
performance) and an actor himself/herself.
We only indicated the problem, in our opinion, characterizing the modernity and
consisting of the change in the relations between acting and event, their approaching or
discontinuity, purification from somebody else’s appropriation.
Despite the conditional struggle between the old and “the new”, at present, the
Russian artistic subculture is distinguished by sufficient cohesion under the condition of
big difference in material provision, and the subculture continues the struggle for own
values and interests in mass media. Besides, the means of mass media themselves are the
refection of culture-universal trend to narrowing the private sphere, increasing “the
visibility” of a person’s private life, greater representation and self-representation motivated
by the desire of popularity growth and, as a result, capitalization of a person as a product
(Nikolaenko, 2014).
And in this trend the actor’s Russian emotional nature follows the worldwide
tendencies, which, in our opinion, can threaten the artistic subculture itself and actor’s
identity. The question is whether the actor and his/her profession are preserved when a lot
of other people are dealing with self-representation. The competition for attention is
expanded in the virtual space of mobile applications and space of screens (Kelle, 2018).
The accessibility of a camera and ways to show oneself makes representation
extremely affordable. And if we perceive anyone who wants to transform, impress, induce
emotions as an actor, we can speak of the end of the subculture, which became the culture.
And it is the actor’s theatrical emotional nature (mostly domestic) that strives for
preserving itself via the reproduction of tradition, support of mythologems, values of actors’
education.
REVISTA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA. época. Año 14, N° 41, 2023
Tatiana V. Portnova// Methodology of Modern Theatrical Art in the Formation... 801-812
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.41.45
811
Conclusion
Thus, the essence of the actor’s emotional nature is the production of performance,
which, as we assumed, comprises acting and event. Performance arises from the
combination of acting, vital, spontaneous, energy principle and event discovering the truth,
disrupting the continuous being. The performative practices and anthropological senses,
which we emphasize and track in the history of European civilization, are arranged and
localized around it as “the energy core”.
The redundancy of acting and its viability in combination with the event
revolutionary character conditioned the liminal position of actors among medieval
communities. Thereby, the actor’s figure itself attracted the whole range of
contraindications of the medieval culture, between the humorous (overt) and rational
(covert), folk and elite culture. In the modern period, an actor preserved the position of a
subject without a place” in social-political and social-economic coordinate system already.
References
Badiou, А. (2011). Rhapsody for theater. Brief philosophical treatise. А. Badiou. М.: Modern.
P. 12.
Baranichenko, N. V. Development of actors’ subculture in world civilization space: author’s
abstract of the dissertation of candidate of philosophical sciences: 24.00.01 / Baranichenko
Natalia Vasilievna; [Defense venue: Belgorod State University]. - Belgorod, 2018. - 26 p.
Belousova, М.М., Melnik, Yu.М., Rimskaya, О.N., Rimsky, V.P. (2009). Methodology of
studying subcultures in social-humanitarian sciences (on example of youth subculture).
Article 1. Culture and subculture. М.М. Belousova, Yu.М. Melnik, О.N. Rimskaya, V.P.
Rimsky. Scientific gazette of BelSU. Series Philosophy. Sociology. Law. 8 (63). Issue. 8.
Belgorod. P. 30-41.
Deleuze, G. (2017). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. G. Deleuze.
Yekaterinburg: U-Faktoria. P. 72.
Goldberg R. (2015). Performance art. From futurism to our days. М.: Ad Marginem Press,
2015, 311 p.
Gurevich, L.Ya. (2012). History of Russian theatrical daily routine: From mid-XVII to early
XIX century. 2nd edition. L.Ya. Gurevich. М.: Book House “Librokom”. P. 44.
Kelle, V.Zh. (2018). Spirituality and intellectual principle of culture. Man in intellectual and
spiritual spaces. Editor-in-chief М.S. Kiseleva [Coll. papers] V.Zh. Kelle. М.: Progress. P.
22.
REVISTA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA. época. Año 14, N° 41, 2023
Tatiana V. Portnova// Methodology of Modern Theatrical Art in the Formation... 801-812
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.41.45
812
Krivtsova, Yu. Performance concept: action, efficiency and actuality of modern art //
Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2009. 4 (61). p. 188-191.
Lipovetsky, М., Beumers, B. (2012). Performance of violence: Literary and theatrical
experiments of “new drama. М. Lipovetsky, B. Beumers. М.: New literary review. P. 35.
Massumi B. (2019). What do animals teach us in politics? B. Massumi. Perm. P. 32.
Nikolaenko, D.А. (2014). Hermeneutic peculiarities of main communication types in
traditional dance. D.А. Nikolaenko. Culture o people of Black Sea region. 276. P. 164.
Petrov, М.K. ( 1997). Antique culture. М.K. Petrov. М.: ROSSPEN. P. 116.
Zhuravlev, А.L., Nestik, Т.А. (2011). Group reflexivity: Main approaches and perspectives of
investigations. А.L. Zhuravlev, Т.А. Nestik. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill. 3. P. 94.