Caso Clínico
Parasitología
Kasmera 47(2):138-143, Julio-Diciembre, 2019
P-ISSN 0075-5222 E-ISSN 2477-9628
doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3406795
Dipylidiasis in children, a generally misdiagnosed cestodiasis. First case reported in Venezuela
Dipylidiasis en niños, una cestodiasis generalmente mal diagnosticada. Primer caso reportado en Venezuela
González-Ramírez, Luisa Carolina (Autor de Correspondencia). https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4431-965X. Grupo de Investigación “Análisis de Muestras Biológicas y Forenses”. Carrera Laboratorio Clínico e Histopatológico. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo. Riobamba. Ecuador. Laboratorio de Investigaciones Parasitológicas “Jesús Moreno Rangel”. Cátedra de Parasitología. Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioanálisis. Universidad de Los Andes. Mérida. Venezuela. Dirección postal: Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Av. Antonio José de Sucre. Grupo de Investigación “Análisis de Muestras Biológicas y Forenses”. Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo. Riobamba. Ecuador. Teléfono +593997185605. E-mail: lcgonzalez@unach.edu.ec
Blanco de García, María Alejandra https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2429-0201. Laboratorio de Investigaciones Parasitológicas “Jesús Moreno Rangel”. Cátedra de Parasitología. Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioanálisis. Universidad de Los Andes. Mérida. Venezuela. E-mail: alejandrablanco1004@gmail.com
Gil-Gómez, Florimar https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8778-1895. Laboratorio de Investigaciones Parasitológicas “Jesús Moreno Rangel”. Cátedra de Parasitología. Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioanálisis. Universidad de Los Andes. Mérida. Venezuela. E-mail: florimargil@gmail.com
Díaz-Mora, José Javier https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5949-2308. Clínica del Niño. Mérida. Venezuela. E-mail: gastrojavi@yahoo.es
Noya-González, Oscar https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1575-8159. Sección de Biohelmintiasis. Instituto de Medicina Tropical. Universidad Central de Venezuela. Caracas. Venezuela. E-mail: noyaoo@yahoo.com
Prato-Moreno, José Gregorio https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8381-404X. Grupo de Investigación Clean Energy and Environment. Facultad de Ingeniería. Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo. Riobamba. Ecuador. Área de Ingeniería Ambiental. Facultad de Ingeniería. Universidad de Los Andes. Mérida. Venezuela. E-mail: pratoj@gmail.com
Fuentes, Màrius Vicent https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9508-6390. Parasites & Health Research Group. Departament de Farmàcia i Tecnologia Farmacèutica i Parasitologia, Facultat de Farmàcia. Universitat de València. Burjassot. València. Spain. E-mail: mario.v.fuentes@uv.es
Abstract
The first case report of human dipylidiasis in Venezuela is presented, including the diagnosis and treatment of a two-year-old child’s infection. The diagnosis was parasitologically confirmed, the child was treated with praziquantel and the animal reservoir and its fleas were identified.
Keywords: Dipylidium caninum, Cestode Infections, parasite, zoonoses, children, Venezuela
Resumen
Se presenta el primer caso de dipylidiasis humana en Venezuela, incluyendo el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de la infección de un niño de dos años. El diagnóstico fue confirmado parasitológicamente, se trató al niño con praziquantel y fueron identificados el reservorio animal y sus pulgas.
Palabras clave: Dipylidium caninum, Infecciones por Cestodos, parásito, zoonosis, niños, Venezuela.
Received: 07/07/2019 Accepted: 03/09/2019 On-line Publication: 03/09//2019
How to Cite: González-Ramírez Luisa, Blanco de García María, Gil-Gómez Florimar, Díaz-Mora José, Noya-González Oscar, Prato-Moreno José, Fuentes, Màrius. Dipylidiasis in children, a generally misdiagnosed cestodiasis. First case reported in Venezuela. Kasmera. 2019;47(2):138-143. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3406795
Introduction
Dipylidiasis, a parasitosis of the intestine of canids and felids produced by Dipylidium caninum, a cyclophyllidean dog tapeworm, is a zoonotic infection rarely reported in humans, who may act as an accidental definitive host. This parasitosis is considered a minor zoonosis in humans, with about 350 cases reported worldwide so far (1,2). The majority of cases has been reported in children (2-6) of nursing age (2,7,8), usually infected by the accidental ingestion of fleas or lice of their pets (7,9-11).
The objective of this report is to alert health professionals, in general, and paediatricians, in particular, on the zoonotic transmission of D. caninum, putting emphasis on the clinical and morphological identification of proglottids as well as egg packets or capsules, the main parasitic structures released by patients.
Patient Information
Main problems and symptoms of the patient: the patient is a nursing male baby, 11 month and 22 days of age, who was taken to a paediatrician by his mother, as he had had gastrointestinal disorders for two months, and could not be diagnosed in other laboratories. He was attended in our laboratory when he expelled parasite structures of white colour from the anus. The child and his family (his parents, two siblings six and eight years-old and a dog) reside in the Caucagüita neighbourhood of Ejido (Mérida state, Venezuela) in a one-family home, with drinking water and sewers. The other members of the family were not coproparasitologically examined because all of whom were asymptomatic and none expelled parasite structures. The social status of the family according the Graffar, modified by Mendez-Castellanos (12), socioeconomic classification is V, indicating extreme poverty.
Clinical findings: the physical examination revealed an abnormal physical condition with loss of appetite, abdominal pain and weight and height below the percentile of his age group. At biochemical level, only a light hypoalbuminemia and a decrease of electrolytes such as sodium and calcium were detected, with the remaining parameters (total proteins, globulins, urea, creatinine, AST, ALT and potassium) being normal. Haematological and immunological analyses showed a normal white cell count (7,800xmm3), with a discrete eosinophilia (5%), light anaemia (haemoglobin 11.3 g/dL; haematocrit 36.0%), a normal count of platelets (275,000 K/μL) and significant increase of total IgE (179.4 IU/mL, reference value for 0-3 years olds until 46 IU/mL).
Timeline: the development of the events of the patient (timeline) is graphically presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Timeline of Dipylidium caninum case report.
Diagnostic methods: stool samples, obtained from all family members, were examined using a wet mount slide and formol-ether concentration (13). Coproparasitological analyses revealed, only in the nursing male baby, diarrhoea with liquid stools, presence of gravid proglottids (2-3/6-20 mm), containing ≥ 50 egg packets (150-300 μm) identified as belonging to the species D. caninum (Figure 2a-d), as well as between 0-2 leukocytes per field. No other parasites were found in the analysis.
Figure 2. a) Gravid proglottids expelled by the child; b) detail of stained gravid proglottids showing egg packets; c) egg packets extracted from the proglottids; d) stained egg packets; e) strobila expelled by the child; f) detail of the scolex showing the four suckers, the rostellum and its hooks. Scale bar = 1 cm (a,e); 1 mm (b); 100 μm (c,d,f).
Therapeutic interventions: praziquantel at a single dose of 10 mg/kg of body weight was administered. The capsules of the drug were suspended in simple syrup until a suspension of 10 mg/5 mL was obtained.
Follow-up and result of the intervention: after the treatment, the child’s faeces collected from the diaper were sifted, observing the expulsion of the parasite strobila of 40.3 cm/3 mm on the second day post-treatment, including the scolex (Figure 2e-f). Microscopic observation of the gravid proglottids, after staining with alcoholic chlorhydric carmine, corroborated the diagnosis by means of the observation of two genital pores, symmetrically situated at the lateral margins, and numerous egg capsules or packets, containing between 10-30 typical eggs, in the uterus. In addition, the scolex showed a rostelum with 4 circles of hooks of 12-15 μm shaped like a rose thorn (Figure 2f).
Once the strobila was released with the scolex of the tapeworm, the mother did not observe further proglottids in the patient’s diaper during the following three months. The patient’s physical condition was normal; he did not present any gastrointestinal symptoms. The ensuing serial coproparasitological analysis was negative; no more tapeworm proglottids, egg capsules, eggs and/or other parasites were found. Moreover, results of the haematological, the biochemical and the immunological analyses were within the reference range; total IgE decreased to 41.2 IU/mL. The mother was satisfied with the child's recovery, signed the informed consent so that the results can be disclosed and the case can be made public.
The dog, three years old, living in the patient’s house did not present any gastrointestinal disorders or other symptoms, with the exception of the expulsion of D. caninum proglottids together with the faeces and the collection of 20 adult fleas, morphologically identified, according mainly to the presence of genal and protoracic spines, their head shape and the length of the first genal spine, as belonging to the species Ctenocephalides canis, one of the potential intermediate hosts of the tapeworm. The dog was treated against fleas (ivermectin, 400 mcg/kg every 14 days for two months) and tapeworms (praziquantel, a single dose of 10 mg/kg of body weight). These findings allowed completing all the links of the epidemiological chain of the infection of the child.
Discussion
Most human dipylidiasis cases have been reported in small children (1,2). This parasitism often remains asymptomatic unnoticed by the parents, as proglottids are not observed in the faeces or parents may confuse the proglottids with food debris (14). Proglottids of this tapeworm can easily be confused with other parasites, such as Enterobius vermicularis (15,16), because its symptomalogy is nonspecific and doctors have little information about this zoonosis; or can also be confused with fly larvae or maggots due to their size (17), colour and mobility at the perianal area or on the faeces (they can move actively on the child’s stool), and also due to their ability to migrate from the anus independent of defecation.
Misdiagnoses of this kind lead to erroneous treatment drugs against nematodes (benzimidazoles, pyrantel pamoate or piperazine) do not act against cestodes. Other professionals may confuse D. caninum proglottids with those of Taenia solium or T. saginata, as the latter are more prevalent and better known being common human cestodes. Although the treatment against intestinal tapeworms is the same, it is recommendable to diagnose the parasite at specific level, trying to shed light on its epidemiology and the different transmission route. The infection of humans by D. caninum is caused through the accidental ingestion of fleas or lice infected with mature cysticercoids, while the transmission of Taenia spp. takes place after the ingestion of undercooked or incorrectly frozen meat infected with cysticerci.
Coprological analyses do not include the routine diagnosis of dipylidiasis. As the health professionals usually are unfamiliar with this tapeworm, it is recommendable for them to know the main morphological differential characteristics of D. caninum: flattened gravid proglottids with two genital pores, of a whitish colour, having the shape and size of a melon or cucumber seed. After being naturally dried out, proglottids may have the appearance of rice grains; egg capsules or packets present on the faeces after the gravid proglottids have been torn (1-7).
Dipylidiasis is usually asymptomatic; however, after the prepatent period of 20 days, nonspecific symptoms may ensue likely to include some minor intestinal disorders: diarrhoea, mild abdominal pain (usually epigastric, colic-like pain), constipation, anal pain and pruritus, distention, meteorism, diminishing appetite, weight loss, allergic reactions and discrete eosinophilia, as well as heart palpitations, irritability, anxiety, agitation and insomnia (17,18). This pathogenicity seems to be related in part to the absorption of various metabolic residues of the tapeworm (19). All symptoms and clinical manifestations disappear after the expulsion of the parasite.
The patient’s clinical improvement as a consequence of the elimination of the parasite should be emphasized. After treatment, the child was asymptomatic from a gastrointestinal viewpoint. Laboratory analyses turned out to be normal within the reference range, even the total IgE had diminished from 179.4 to 41.2 IU/mL. These findings demonstrate that the symptomatology was caused by the presence of the tapeworm.
The presence of fleas and lice in parasitized animals causes pruritus which provokes the scratching with the insects being crushed by the teeth releasing the cysticercoids in the animal’s mouth. When a person has close physical contact with the animal (e.g. kissing) or it licks some objects or toys, the cysticercoids can be transmitted to human hands and/or the mouth (20,21). Another transmission route described is the contamination of foodstuffs and beverages carrying infected insects with cysticercoids (22). Moreover, given that the tapeworm does not multiply in the definitive host, the helminth burden in humans is generally low, with few reports of multiple infections (23). Knowing about the D. caninum life cycle and about the different routes of transmission in children will favour early diagnosis and effective treatment.
Although
D. caninum has been reported as a human parasite on the five continents
(7-9,24-27),
and also has been reported in canids in Venezuela (28,29),
as far as we know, this is the first human case report from that
country, even after having carried out an exhaustive literature review concerning
this matter.
The most recommended preventive measures against this parasitosis include avoiding the direct contact of children with dogs and cats, and regular veterinary check-ups of pets, mainly to keep domestic animals free from ectoparasites (fleas and lice) and helminths. In the case of stray dogs and cats, control programs of ecto and endoparasites have to be also implemented. Moreover, excrements of cats and dogs in recreational areas have to be removed. In spite of the low frequency of human parasitation by D. caninum and the generally nonspecific or absent pathology, the health care personnel, especially pediatricians and laboratory workers, have to be familiar with this tapeworm and its diagnostic structures, both macroscopic (gravid proglottids) as well as microscopic (egg capsules or packets) of this zoonosis. Children with dogs or cats as pets may become infected more frequently than suspected, since in addition to being a cosmopolitan infection, there is a growing trend towards cohabitation with pets worldwide. In the United States alone in 2012, it was estimated that there were 69,926,000 dogs and 74,059,000 cats as pets that could transmit this little-known parasitic disease (30).
Although there might have been other human cases of D. caninum in Venezuela, they might not have been diagnosed or reported. Therefore, the present case, which could not be diagnosed before in other laboratories, lays bare that physicians and laboratory professionals lack experience in the diagnosis of D. caninum, resulting in the erroneous identification of the parasite as well as in the patient’s treatment. Hence, health care professionals should be made familiar with the morphological characteristics of this tapeworm, which are indispensable for parasitological diagnosis. At the same time, physicians should be informed about the drug, the correct dose for the treatment, the source of infection and the intermediate host of the tapeworm.
Conflict of interests
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Bibliographic References
1. Hogan CA, Schwenk H. Dipylidium caninum Infection [Internet]. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:E39. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31116922 DOI:10.1056/NEJMicm1813985 PMID 31116922 Google Scholar
2. Jiang P, Zhang X, Liu RD, Wang ZQ, Cui J. A human case of zoonotic dog tapeworm, Dipylidium caninum (Eucestoda: Dilepidiidae), in China. Korean J Parasitol [Internet]. 2017;55(1):61-4. Disponible en: http://parasitol.kr/journal/view.php?doi=10.3347/kjp.2017.55.1.61 DOI: 10.3347/kjp.2017.55.1.61 PMID 28285500 PMCID PMC5365269 Google Scholar
3. Fanta Nuñez E. Parasitismo humano por Dipylidium caninum (Linneo 1758): Comunicación de dos casos. Rev Chil Pediatr [Internet]. 1952;23(9):393-6. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0370-41061952000900005&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en DOI: 10.4067/S0370-41061952000900005 Google Scholar
4. Devera R, Campos F. Dipilidiasis humana. Rev Biomed. 1998;9:44−5. Google Scholar
5. Vargas CJ, Trejos CP, Vargas VM. Dipilidiasis en un niño costarricense. Rev Biomed [Internet]. 2000;11(2):129-31. Disponible en: http://revistabiomedica.mx/index.php/revbiomed/article/view/228 DOI: 10.32776/revbiomed.v11i2.228 Google Scholar
6. Neira Otero P, Jofré ML, Muñoz SN. Infección por Dipylidium caninum en un preescolar. Presentación del caso y revisión de la literatura [Internet]. Rev Chil Infectol. 2008;25(6):465-71. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-10182008000600010&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en DOI: 10.4067/S0716-10182008000600010 Google Scholar
7. Romero Cabello R, Candil Ruiz A, Romero Feregrino R, Calderón Romero L, Romero Feregrino R, Tay Zavala J. Dipylidium caninum infection. BMJ Case Rep [Internet]. 2011;2011:bcr0720114510. Disponible en: http://casereports.bmj.com/content/2011/bcr.07.2011.4510.abstract DOI: 10.1136/bcr.07.2011.4510 Google Scholar
8. García-Agudo L, García-Martos P, Rodríguez-Iglesias M. Dipylidium caninum infection in an infant: a rare case report and literature review. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed [Internet]. 2014;4:S565-7. Disponible en: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2221169115300484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12980/APJTB.4.2014APJTB-2014-0034 Google Scholar
9. Taylor T, Zitzmann MB. Dipylidium caninum in a 4-month old male. Clin Lab Sci [Internet]. 2011;24(4):212-4. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22288218 PMID 22288218 Google Scholar
10. Sarvi S, Daryani A, Sharif M, Rahimi MT, Kohansal MH, Mirshafiee S, et al. Zoonotic intestinal parasites of carnivores: A systematic review in Iran. Vet World [Internet]. 2018;11(1):58-65. Disponible en: http://www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.11/January-2018/11.html DOI:10.14202/vetworld.2018.58-65 PMID 29479158 PMCID 29479158 Google Scholar
11. Rincon MJ, Gonzalez-Granado LI. Pets and dipylidiasis [Internet]. Vol. 74, Anales de Pediatria. Elsevier; 2011. p. 420. Disponible en: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S169540331100052X DOI: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2011.01.019 Google Scholar
12. https://medicinainternaaldia.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/estratificacic3b3n-social-metodo-graffar-modificado.pdf.
13. Knight WB, Hiatt RA, Cline BL, Ritchie LS. A modification of the formol ether concentration technique for increased sensitivity in detecting Schistosoma mansoni eggs. Am J Trop Med Hyg [Internet]. 1976;25(6):818-23. Disponible en: http://www.ajtmh.org/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.1976.25.818 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1976.25.818 PMID 1008127 Google Scholar
14. Molina CP, Ogburn J, Adegboyega P. Infection by Dipylidium caninum in an Infant. Arch Pathol Lab Med [Internet]. 2003;127(3):e157-9. Disponible en: https://www.archivesofpathology.org/doi/abs/10.1043/0003-9985%282003%29127%3Ce157%3AIBDCIA%3E2.0.CO%3B2 DOI: 10.1043/0003-9985(2003)127<e157:IBDCIA>2.0.CO;2 PMID 12653607 Google Scholar
15. Stuart HC, Augustine DL. Dipylidium caninum infection in an infant six months of age: report of a case. JAMA Pediatr [Internet]. 1928;36(3):523-5. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1928.01920270100011 DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1928.01920270100011 Google Scholar
16. Samkari A, Kiska DL, Riddell SW, Wilson K, Weiner LB, Domachowske JB. Dipylidium caninum mimicking recurrent Enterobius vermicularis (pinworm) infection. Clin Pediatr (Phila) [Internet]. 2008;47(4):397-9. Disponible en: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0009922807310247 DOI: 10.1177/0009922807310247 PMID 18424563 Google Scholar
17. Hamrick HJ, Drake WR, Jones HM, Askew AP, Weatherly NF. Two cases of dipylidiasis (dog tapeworm infection) in children: update on an old problem. Pediatrics [Internet]. julio de 1983;72(1):114-7. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6683398 PMID 6683398 Google Scholar
18. Ramana KV., Rao SD, Rao R, Mohanty SK, Wilson CG. Human dipylidiasis: A case report of Dipylidium caninum infection in teaching hospital at Karimnagar. Online J Heal Allied Sci [Internet]. 2011;10(2):28. Disponible en: http://cogprints.org/7990/ Google Scholar
19. Chappell CL, Enos JP, Penn HM. Dipylidium caninum, an underrecognized infection in infants and children. Pediatr Infect Dis J [Internet]. 1990;9(10):745-7. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2235150 PMID 2235150 Google Scholar
20. Margolis B. Dog Tapeworm Infestation in an Infant. Am J Dis Child [Internet]. 1983;137(7):702. Disponible en: http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/archpedi.1983.02140330084023 DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1983.02140330084023 PMID 6683072 Google Scholar
21. Vélez-Hernández L, Reyes-Barrera KL, Rojas-Almaráz D, Calderón-Oropeza MA, Cruz-Vázquez JK, Arcos-García JL. Riesgo potencial de parásitos zoonóticos presentes en heces caninas en Puerto Escondido, Oaxaca. Salud Publica Mex [Internet]. 2014;56(6):625-30. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0036-36342014000600012&nrm=iso Google Scholar
22. Macpherson CNL, Torgerson PR. Dogs and cestode zoonoses. En: Macpherson C, Meslin F, Wandeler A, editores. Dogs, zoonoses and public health [Internet]. 2nd ed. Wallingford: CABI; 2013. p. 127-52. Disponible en: http://www.cabi.org/cabebooks/ebook/20133011784 DOI: 10.1079/9781845938352.0127 Google Scholar
23. Wong MH. Multiple infestation with Dipylidium caninum in an infant. Can Med Assoc J [Internet]. 1955;72(6):453-5. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14352116 PMID 14352116 Google Scholar
24. Reid CJD, Perry FM, Evans N. Dipylidium caninum in an infant. Eur J Pediatr [Internet]. 1992;151(7):502-3. Disponible en: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF01957754 DOI: 10.1007/BF01957754 PMID 1396912 Google Scholar
25. Casasbuenas P. Infección por Dipydilium caninum. Rev Colomb Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2005;20(2):86-8. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-99572005000200010 Google Scholar
26. Ayala Rodríguez I, Doménech Cañete I, Rodríguez Llanes M, Urquiaga Gardentey A. Parasitismo intestinal por Dipylidium caninum. Rev Cuba Med Mil [Internet]. 2012;41(2):191-4. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0138-65572012000200010 Google Scholar
27. Narasimham MV, Panda P, Mohanty I, Sahu S, Padhi S, Dash M. Dipylidium caninum infection in a child: A rare case report. Indian J Med Microbiol [Internet]. 2013;31(1):82-4. Disponible en: http://www.ijmm.org/text.asp?2013/31/1/82/108738 DOI: 10.4103/0255-0857.108738 PMID 23508438 Google Scholar
28. Tortolero Low LJ, Cazorla Perfetti DJ, Morales Moreno P, Acosta Quintero ME. Prevalencia de Enteroparásitos en Perros Domiciliadores de la Ciudad de la Vela, Estado Falcón, Venezuela. Rev Científica Fac Ciencias Vet [Internet]. 2008;18(3):312-9. Disponible en: http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0798-22592008000300012 Google Scholar
29. Ramírez-Barrios RA, Barboza-Mena G, Muñoz J, Angulo-Cubillán F, Hernández E, González F, et al. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in dogs under veterinary care in Maracaibo, Venezuela. Vet Parasitol [Internet]. 2004;121(1-2):11-20. Disponible en: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0304401704001013 DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.02.024 PMID 15110399 Google Scholar
30. American Veterinary Medical Association. U.S. Pet Ownership & Demographics Sourcebook 2012. Schaumburg, IL: American Veterinary Medical Association, 2012
Authors Contribution
GRLC: Performed the hematological, biochemical and immunological analysis of the patient. Collected data and helminthological material, identified the species, drafted and revised the manuscript. BGMA: Colored the helminthological material, identified the species and revised the manuscript. GGF: Prepared and helminthological material, identified the species and revised the manuscript. DMJJ: Pediatrician who performed the clinical analysis of the patient and prescribed the treatment dose. NGO: Supplied the treatment. Complemented the literature review, assisted in the writing and revision of the manuscript. PMJG: Collected fleas and avoided environmental pollution. Bibliographic review, manuscript revision writing. FMV: Verified the helminthological material, identified fleas, drafted and critically reviewed the manuscript.
©2019. The Authors. Kasmera. Publication of the Infectious and Tropical Diseases Department. Faculty of Medicine. Zulia University. Maracaibo-Venezuela. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons non-commercial attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) license that allows unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any means, as long as the original work is duly cited.