Invest Clin 65(1): 99 - 108, 2024 https://doi.org/10.54817/IC.v65n1a09
Corresponding author: Quanlin Jia, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Shanxi Changzhi Se-
cond People’s Hospital, Changzhi, 046000, Shanxi Province, China. E-mail: yanmushan185071612@163.com
Effect of fractional exhaled carbon monoxide
on patients with sleep apnea-hypopnea
syndrome and its mechanism.
Quanlin Jia1, Li Guo1, Xinhua Zheng1, Guangwei Li1 and Lu Liu2
1Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Shanxi Changzhi Second
People’s Hospital, China.
2Department of Special Care Ward, Shanxi Changzhi Second People’s Hospital,
Changzhi, China.
Keywords: Sleep-disordered breathing; fractional exhaled carbon monoxide; eosinophils;
erythrocyte sedimentation rate; C-reactive protein.
Abstract. Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is a common sleep disorder as-
sociated with chronic airway inflammation and lung function impairment. This
article aimed to investigate the fractional exhaled carbon monoxide (FeCO)
expression level in obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) and
its correlation with disease indicators. Subjects with OSAHS, asthma, chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and healthy subjects were selected to
collect clinical data. FeCO concentration, eosinophil (Eos), erythrocyte sed-
imentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), FEV1, and FEV1/FVC were
measured. The Pearson correlation coefficient and receiver operating charac-
teristic (ROC) curve were used for statistical analysis. The FeCO concentra-
tion, Eos count, ESR and CRP levels, and lung function in the OSAHS group
were higher than the healthy and COPD groups (p<0.05) and slightly lower
than the asthma group. FeCO was positively correlated with Eos, ESR, and CRP
(p<0.05), but there was no apparent correlation between FeCO and lung func-
tion. FeCO has a high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of OSAHS.
There is chronic airway inflammation and systemic inflammation in patients
with OSAHS. Lung function impairment in patients with OSAHS is mild, but
some limitations remain. FeCO may be an auxiliary diagnostic index particu-
larly valuable in diagnosing OSAHS.
100 Jia et al.
Investigación Clínica 65(1): 2024
Efecto de la fracción exhalada de monóxido de carbono
en pacientes con síndrome de apnea-hipopnea del sueño
y su mecanismo.
Invest Clin 2024; 65 (1): 99 – 108
Palabras clave: Respiración alterada durante el sueño; fracción de monóxido de carbono
exhalado; eosinófilos; velocidad de sedimentación globular; proteína
C-reactiva.
Resumen. Los trastornos respiratorios del sueño (TRS) son un desorden
del sueño común asociado con inflamación crónica de las vías respiratorias y
deterioro de la función pulmonar. Este artículo tuvo como objetivo investigar el
nivel fraccional de exhalación de monóxido de carbono (FeCO) en el síndrome
de apnea-hipopnea obstructiva del sueño (SAHOS) y su correlación con los indi-
cadores de la enfermedad. Se seleccionaron sujetos con SAHOS, asma, enferme-
dad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC) y sujetos sanos para recopilar datos
clínicos. Se midieron la concentración de FeCO, eosinófilos (Eos), velocidad de
sedimentación globular (ESR), proteína C reactiva (PCR), FEV1 y FEV1/FVC.
Para el análisis estadístico se utilizaron el coeficiente de correlación de Pearson
y la curva de características operativas del receptor (ROC). La concentración
de FeCO, el recuento de Eos, los niveles de VSG y PCR y la función pulmonar
en el grupo de OSAHS fueron claramente más altos que en los grupos sanos y
con EPOC (p<0,05) y ligeramente más bajos que en el grupo de asma. FeCO
se correlacionó positivamente con Eos, ESR y CRP (p<0,05), pero no hubo
correlación aparente entre FeCO y la función pulmonar. El FeCO mostró una
alta sensibilidad y especificidad en el diagnóstico del SAHOS. Existe inflama-
ción crónica de las vías respiratorias e inflamación sistémica en pacientes con
SAHOS. El deterioro de la función pulmonar en pacientes con SAHOS es leve,
pero persisten algunas limitaciones. El FeCO puede ser un índice diagnóstico
auxiliar particularmente valioso en el diagnóstico del SAHOS.
Received: 06-08-2023 Accepted: 07-11-2023
INTRODUCTION
Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is a
common sleep disorder. SDB refers to dis-
eases in which the respiratory system is dam-
aged during sleep, resulting in weakened
respiratory function and decreased oxygen-
ation 1,2. Etiologically, SDB can be caused by
a variety of reasons. The most common cause
of SDB is obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea
syndrome (OSAHS), which is apnea and hy-
popnea caused by airway obstruction. Other
causes may include neuromuscular disorders
(such as muscle weakness and spinal cord
injury), central hypoventilation syndrome
(such as obesity and craniocerebral injury),
and the effects of certain medications 3,4. The
clinical symptoms of SDB include nocturnal
snoring, frequent sleep disruption, apnea,
oxygen desaturation, poor sleep quality, day-
time sleepiness, and inattention. Long-term
failure to receive adequate treatment may
Fractional exhaled CO in patients with sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome 101
Vol. 65(1): 99 - 108, 2024
lead to severe consequences such as cardio-
vascular disease, metabolic disorders, and
cognitive impairment 5.
Researchers are committed to improv-
ing the diagnosis and screening methods of
SDB, including improving and developing
sleep monitoring technology to improve the
early identification and intervention of the
disease. In addition, the etiology and mecha-
nism of SDB are also being actively explored,
including abnormalities in respiratory con-
trol centers, changes in neck and upper air-
way structures 6,7. These studies contribute
to a better understanding of the disease and
provide a basis for developing therapeutic
methods. Treatment for SDB continues to
evolve and includes behavioral and lifestyle
changes such as weight loss, improved sleep
position, and avoidance of alcohol and seda-
tives. In addition, surgical intervention may
be an option for some specific etiologies,
such as obstructive sleep apnea syndrome,
due to structural abnormalities of the up-
per airway. Surgical methods include palatal
tonsillectomy, palatal ptosis, and uvula sur-
gery to expand airway access 8,9. The use of
drug therapy in SDB is relatively limited and
is usually reserved for specific conditions or
in combination with other treatments. Some
medications can enhance respiratory func-
tion by stimulating respiratory centers or
improving muscle tone.
Fractional exhaled carbon monoxide
(FeCO) is the carbon monoxide gas dis-
charged from the lungs through the respi-
ratory system. It is a colorless, odorless gas
produced during combustion reactions dur-
ing metabolic processes, especially tobacco
combustion 10,11. Carbon monoxide enters
the circulation mainly through gas exchange
between the alveoli and capillaries and is
then expelled from the lungs by respiration.
FeCO measurement can be performed by a
carbon monoxide breath test, which mea-
sures the concentration of carbon monoxide
in the breath and thus assesses the produc-
tion and metabolism of carbon monoxide
in the body. The measurement of FeCO can
be used as one of the indicators to evaluate
exposure to combustion products or envi-
ronmental pollutants, as well as to monitor
the degree of inflammation and oxidative
stress12-14. Studies have shown a correlation
between SDB and FeCO levels 15. The lack of
oxygenation caused by apnea and hypopnea
during sleep in patients with SDB may lead
to an increased demand for oxygen, affect-
ing the metabolism and excretion of carbon
monoxide. Therefore, FeCO levels may vary in
patients with SDB. Some studies have shown
that FeCO levels may be valuable in assessing
SDB 16-17. The repeated hypoventilation and
hypoxia events during sleep in patients with
SDB may lead to oxidative stress and inflam-
mation. Carbon monoxide is a biomarker re-
lated to oxidative stress and inflammation.
Therefore, some studies have attempted to
assess the oxidative stress and inflammation
status of SDB patients by measuring FeCO
levels 18,19. In addition, it has been suggested
that FeCO levels may be associated with the
severity and prognosis of SDB. Higher FeCO
levels may be associated with more severe
disease and poor prognosis, including an in-
creased risk of cardiovascular complications
20. Despite some association observations,
there is currently insufficient evidence to
support using FeCO levels as a diagnostic cri-
terion or an independent diagnostic indica-
tor for SDB. The diagnosis of SDB relies pri-
marily on polysomnography, which assesses
respiratory events, oxygenation measures,
and other relevant parameters. In conclu-
sion, although there may be a correlation
between FeCO and SDB, further studies are
needed to clarify its exact value in diagnos-
ing and evaluating SDB.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study subjects
Forty-eight patients with OSAHS who
were treated in the Respiratory Department
of Shanxi Changzhi Second People’s Hospital
from February 2021 to October 2022 were
enrolled in the OSAHS group, 50 patients
102 Jia et al.
Investigación Clínica 65(1): 2024
with asthma as asthma group, 52 patients
with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(COPD) as COPD group, and 48 healthy peo-
ple who underwent physical examination in
the same period as a healthy group. There
were no apparent differences in gender,
age, course of disease, and smoking history
among the four groups.
Inclusion criteria
OSAHS group: aged between 18 and
65 years old. Patients were diagnosed with
moderate or severe OSAHS according to the
diagnostic criteria of the American Academy
of Sleep Medicine (AASM). The patients had
apparent symptoms of sleep apnea, such as
frequent snoring, poor sleep quality, and
daytime sleepiness.
Asthma group: aged between 18 and 65
years. Asthma was diagnosed according to
the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) di-
agnostic criteria. Asthma-related symptoms
such as cough, shortness of breath, and dys-
pnea were present.
COPD group: aged between 40 and 85
years. COPD was diagnosed according to
the diagnostic criteria of the Global Initia-
tive for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease
(GOLD). Respiratory symptoms included
chronic cough, expectoration, and associ-
ated lung function impairment.
Healthy group: aged between 18 and 65
years old. No respiratory disease was diag-
nosed as OSAHS, asthma, or COPD. There
were no obvious respiratory or sleep-related
symptoms.
Exclusion criteria
Patients with severe heart disease, kid-
ney disease, nervous system disease, or other
serious underlying diseases. Patients under-
going respiratory surgery or treatment. Pa-
tients with severe cognitive or communica-
tion impairments and unable to cooperate
with the trial requirements.
Healthy group: Patients with any chron-
ic disease or other serious health problems.
History of smoking within 24 hours.
The Medical Ethics Committee of
Shanxi Changzhi Second People’s Hospital
approved the trial, and all patients signed an
informed consent.
FeCO concentration detection
We ensured the breath analyzer was in
working condition and calibrated the instru-
ment to ensure accurate measurements. The
breath analyzer was kept clean and free of
dirt or residue. We made the subjects sit or
stand, ensuring they were comfortably ex-
haling. The subjects were instructed to take
several deep breaths to verify adequate ven-
tilation of the lungs. We explained the pro-
cedure and purpose of the test and informed
the subject to keep breathing normally dur-
ing the test. The test subjects were connect-
ed to the breath analyzer (U-breath BA200,
Zhejiang E-link care Medical Technology Co.,
LTD.) using an appropriate-size mask or ex-
piratory tube. The connection site was well-
sealed to avoid gas leakage. The subjects
could breathe normally and pass the breath
into the breath analyzer through the mouth.
The breath analyzer measured and recorded
the concentration of carbon monoxide in
the breath.
Two or three breath measurements were
carried out to obtain a stable average. The
results of each measurement were recorded,
including the time, date, and measurement
value. For each subject tested, the average
FeCO concentration was calculated.
Detection of other indicators
Eosinophils (Eos): Samples were ex-
tracted from the peripheral blood of the
tested subjects, venous whole blood samples
were collected using an anticoagulant collec-
tion vessel, and Eos counts were performed
in an automated blood cell analyzer (BC-
760 CS, Mindray Medical International Co.,
LTD.) under laboratory conditions. Samples
were placed into the hematology analyzer
for analysis according to the instrument’s
instructions. The hematology analyzer mea-
sured the number of Eos in the sample and
Fractional exhaled CO in patients with sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome 103
Vol. 65(1): 99 - 108, 2024
generated the results. Average Eos absolute
count: 0-0.4×109/L for adults.
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR):
samples were extracted from the peripher-
al blood of the tested subjects, and venous
whole blood samples were collected using
anticoagulant blood collection vessels. A
certain amount of blood samples was taken
and placed in the ESR tube of an ESR instru-
ment (BK-ESR40, Shandong Biobasebaby
Technology Co., LTD.). The ESR tube was
placed vertically in the ESR meter, allowing
the blood to drop freely. The ESR tube was
placed into the ESR meter for measurement
according to the device’s specifications and
instructions. The erythrocyte sedimentation
rate in the ESR tube was recorded, and the
normal ESR range was 0-20mm/h for adult
females and 0-15mm/h for adult males.
C-reactive protein (CRP): samples were
extracted from the peripheral blood of the
tested subjects, and venous whole blood
samples were collected using anticoagulant
blood collection tubes. The blood samples
were sent to the laboratory, and the CRP level
in the blood was quantitatively measured by
the immunofluorescence method. According
to the method, sample processing and mea-
surements were performed according to the
corresponding operating instructions. The
CRP concentration in the blood was record-
ed or reported based on the measurements.
The normal concentration should generally
be less than 10mg/L.
Pulmonary function
FEV1 (the volume of air expelled from
the beginning of forced exhalation to the
end of one second of exhalation) and FEV1/
FVC (the ratio of forced expiratory volume
in one second to forced vital capacity) were
measured by adopting a pulmonary func-
tion instrument (MSA99, Beijing Maibang
Photoelectric Instrument Co., LTD.). First,
the pulmonary function meter was in nor-
mal working condition, performing the nec-
essary calibration and verification with a
respirator mask of the appropriate size. The
subjects were placed in a comfortable posi-
tion. The test procedure and purpose were
explained to the subjects, and necessary
instructions were provided. A respirator
of the appropriate size was adopted to the
subjects’ mouth according to the require-
ments of the spirometer, making sure the
mask was well sealed to avoid gas leakage.
The subjects began to take normal resting
breaths as directed by the spirometer. Next,
the subjects were asked to take a maximal,
hard breath, taking in as much air as pos-
sible and then forcing to expel air. Immedi-
ately after a hard inhalation, the subjects
were asked to perform a hard exhalation,
then push the air out of the lungs as hard
as possible, ending the exhalation entirely
as quickly as possible. The spirometer auto-
matically measured and recorded FEV1 and
FVC. Based on the measured FEV1 and FVC
results, the FEV1/FVC ratio was calculated.
Statistical analysis
IBM SPSS 20.0® software was adopted
for data statistical analysis, analysis of vari-
ance was adopted, and the measurement
data were expressed as the mean ± stan-
dard deviation (X±SD). Count data were
expressed as a percentage (%). The χ2 test
and the Pearson correlation analysis were ap-
plied. The significance level was p<0.05, in-
dicating that the difference was statistically
significant.
RESULTS
Comparison of FeCO concentrations,
Eos counts, ESR, CRP, FEV1 and FEV1/
FVC values
The FeCO concentration of the OSAHS
group was higher than the healthy and COPD
groups (p<0.05), but slightly lower than
the asthma group. In the OSAHS group had
Eos count, ESR level, CRP level, FEV1 value,
and markedly higher FEV1/FVC value than
healthy and COPD groups (p<0.05), but a
lower EOS count, inferior ESR level, inferior
104 Jia et al.
Investigación Clínica 65(1): 2024
CRP level, lower FEV1 value and lower FEV1/
FVC value than the asthma group (p<0.05).
(Fig. 1).
Correlation analysis between FeCO
and each index
Pearson analysis was used to analyze the
correlation between FeCO and various indica-
tors. It can be observed that FeCO was positive-
ly correlated with Eos, ESR, and CRP (p<0.05),
and there was no apparent correlation between
FeCO and lung function (Table 1).
The diagnostic value of FeCO for OSAHS
The diagnostic value of FeCO for OSAHS
was analyzed using the receiver operating
characteristic (ROC) curve. The sensitivity
(0.857) and specificity (0.835) of FeCO in
Fig. 1. Contrast of fractional exhaled carbon monoxide (FeCO) concentrations (Fig. 1A), Eosinophil (Eos)
comparison (Fig. 1B), Contrast of Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels (Fig. 1C), Con-
trast of C-reactive protein (CRP) (Fig.1D), Contrast of Forced expiratory volume (FEV1) values
(Fig. 1E), Contrast of Forced expiratory volume/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) values (Fig. 1F).
[Note: * relative to healthy group (p<0.05), # relative to COPD group (p<0.05)].
A
E
CD
F
B
Fractional exhaled CO in patients with sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome 105
Vol. 65(1): 99 - 108, 2024
diagnosing OSAHA were both high. The area
under the ROC curve was 0.824, and the
95% interval was 0.77-0.89 (Fig. 2).
DISCUSSION
This article explored the value of FeCO
as a potential biomarker in diagnosing and
evaluating OSAHS. FeCO has shown its po-
tential as a rapid and non-invasive detection
index in many respiratory diseases. However,
studies on its application and relevance in
OSAHS are still limited. To further under-
stand the potential role and diagnostic value
of FeCO in OSAHS patients, asthma patients,
COPD patients, and healthy controls, FeCO
concentration was compared, and correla-
tion analysis with other clinical indicators
was carried out.
The FeCO concentration in the OSAHS
group was still higher than against healthy
and COPD groups, which may result from
chronic airway inflammation and poor oxy-
genation due to SDB caused by OSAHS. Eos
is a type of white blood cell whose increase
is often associated with airway inflammation
and allergic reactions. The high Eos count in
the OSAHS group may reflect airway inflam-
mation and abnormal gas exchange caused
by OSAHS 21. As against the asthma group,
the Eos count of the OSAHS group was low-
er, which may be due to the different patho-
logical mechanisms of OSAHS and asthma.
The high level of ESR in the OSAHS group
may be related to the chronic airway inflam-
mation and hypoxia caused by OSAHS. As
against the asthma group, the OSAHS group
had a lower ESR level, possibly due to the dif-
ferent inflammatory mechanisms and course
of disease between OSAHS and asthma 22.
CRP is an acute-phase protein, and its
increase is usually associated with inflam-
matory responses and tissue damage. In the
OSAHS group, higher CRP levels may reflect
the presence of abnormal gas exchange and
Table 1
Correlation analysis between fractional exhaled carbon monoxide and each index.
Indicators OSAHS group
(n=48)
r P
Asthma group
(n=50)
r P
COPD group
(n=52)
r P
Eos 0.725 0.015 0.625 0.024 0.719 0.017
ESR 0.562 0.036 0.465 0.044 0.611 0.032
CRP 0.762 0.008 0.633 0.028 0.768 0.014
FEV10.135 0.332 0.089 0.527 0.125 0.343
FEV1/FVC 0.128 0.346 0.077 0.593 0.059 0.665
OSAHS= obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome, COPD= chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Eos= eo-
sinophil, ESR= erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP= C-reactive protein, FEV1= Forced expiratory volume, FVC=
forced vital capacity.
Fig. 2. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)
curve of FeCO (fractional exhaled carbon
monoxide) in the diagnosis of OSAHS (ob-
structive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome).
106 Jia et al.
Investigación Clínica 65(1): 2024
chronic inflammation. In contrast, CRP lev-
els were lower in the OSAHS group than in
the asthma group, which may result from
differences in inflammatory mechanisms
and pathological processes between OSAHS
and asthma 23. FEV1 is an essential indica-
tor in pulmonary function testing to evalu-
ate expiratory flow rate. The OSAHS group
suggested higher FEV1 values, which may
reflect the relatively mild airway stenosis
caused by OSAHS. This situation may be be-
cause OSAHS is mainly caused by partial up-
per airway obstruction, unlike asthma and
COPD. The FEV1/FVC ratio was adopted to
assess the degree of airway obstruction. The
OSAHS group suggested higher FEV1/FVC
values, which may imply that lung function
limitation caused by airway stenosis is rela-
tively mild in OSAHS patients. Zhao et al. 24
discussed the role of FeCO in the auxiliary
diagnosis and evaluation of allergic rhinitis
(AR). They selected AR patients for compari-
son with healthy controls. Symptom scores
distinguished the severity of AR disease, and
the FeCO tested both groups. The results
suggested that the level of FeCO in the AR
group was higher than that in healthy people
and positively correlated with the severity of
AR symptoms. The detection of FeCO can
monitor the changes in AR and has high ac-
curacy as an indicator for the auxiliary diag-
nosis of AR.
The positive correlation between FeCO
and Eos, ESR, and CRP (p<0.05) indicated
that FeCO might be associated with inflam-
matory processes. These indicators play an
essential role in the inflammatory response
so that the elevated FeCO may reflect the
presence of chronic airway inflammation
in OSAHS patients. In terms of lung func-
tion, the correlation between FeCO and lung
function is not apparent, which may mean
that the relationship between FeCO and
the degree of lung function impairment in
OSAHS is unclear. Using ROC curve analysis,
the value of FeCO in diagnosing OSAHS can
be evaluated. The high sensitivity, specificity
and large area under the ROC curve indicat-
ed that FeCO may be adopted as a potential
auxiliary diagnostic index for the screening
and diagnosis of OSAHS.
The correlation between FeCO and
OSAHS suggests that FeCO may serve as a
valuable indicator to reflect the presence
of chronic airway inflammation and play a
role in the diagnosis of OSAHS. It should be
noted that as an auxiliary diagnosis meth-
od, FeCO still needs to be comprehensively
evaluated in combination with other clini-
cal information. The diagnosis of OSAHS is
usually based on a comprehensive analysis of
medical history, physical examination, sleep
monitoring, and pulmonary function test-
ing. As an index, although FeCO has shown
a specific diagnostic value in the experimen-
tal results, it still needs to be combined with
other clinical indicators to make a compre-
hensive judgment.
In conclusion, FeCO level was increased
in OSAHS patients and was associated with
chronic airway inflammation, systemic in-
flammatory response, and mild pulmonary
dysfunction. In addition, FeCO has shown
potential as an auxiliary diagnostic index and
has a particular value in diagnosing OSAHS.
However, there are some limitations in this
article, such as the limited number of study
samples and age and gender differences
across groups that may affect the interpre-
tation of the results. Therefore, future stud-
ies are needed to further explore the physi-
ological mechanism of FeCO in OSAHS and
optimize the diagnostic threshold and its
application in clinical practice. The clinical
significance of this article is that it provides
a new potential indicator for early screening
and diagnosis of OSAHS.
Funding
None
Conflict of competence
The authors declare no conflict of in-
terest.
Fractional exhaled CO in patients with sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome 107
Vol. 65(1): 99 - 108, 2024
Authors’ ORCID Number
Quanlin Jia: 0000-0002-4875-4798
Li Guo: 0000-0002-2529-7643
Xinhua Zheng :0000-0003-3171-173X
Guangwei Li :0000-0002-9995-1695
Lu Liu :0000-0002-7701-7519
Authors’ Participation
QJ and LG contributed to the concep-
tualization of the study, the design of the
methodology, the acquisition of data, and
the analysis and interpretation of data. XZ
contributed to the drafting and revision of
the manuscript. GL was actively involved in
data collection and played a key role in the
statistical analysis. LL contributed to the in-
terpretation of results and critically revised
the manuscript. All authors participated in
the final approval of the version to be pub-
lished and agreed to be accountable for the
accuracy and integrity of the work.
REFERENCES
1. Lee JJ, Sundar KM. Evaluation and ma-
nagement of adults with obstructive sleep
apnea syndrome. Lung 2021;199(2):87-
101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-021-
00426-w.
2. Iannella G, Magliulo G, Greco A, de Vin-
centiis M, Ralli M, Maniaci A, Pace A, Vi-
cini C. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome:
from symptoms to treatment. Int J Environ
Res Public Health 2022;19(4):2459(1-3).
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042459.
3. Malhotra A, Ayappa I, Ayas N, Collop N,
Kirsch D, Mcardle N, Mehra R, Pack AI,
Punjabi N, White DP, Gottlieb DJ. Me-
trics of sleep apnea severity: beyond the
apnea-hypopnea index. Sleep 2021;44(7)
zsab030(1-16). https://doi.org/10.1093/
sleep/zsab030.
4. Zhang L, Ou X, Zhu T, Lv X. Beneficial
effects of estrogens in obstructive sleep
apnea-hypopnea syndrome. Sleep Breath
2020;24(1):7-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s11325-019-01896-2
5. Ya Y, Shi Z, Xue X, Ling T. Comparison
of the diagnostic value of capsule endos-
copy in two positions for esophageal le-
sions in the elderly. Acta Medica Medite-
rr 2019;35(6):3389-3394. https://doi.
org/10.3892%2Fetm.2018.5864.
6. Jiao X, Zou J, Meng L, Liu S, Guan J, Yi H,
Yin S. Risk factors for non-positional obs-
tructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome.
Sleep Breath 2022;26(2):675-680. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s11325-021-02430-z.
7. Akkari M, Yildiz S, Marianowski R, Monte-
yrol PJ, Chalumeau F, Fayoux P, Leboulan-
ger N, Franco P, Couloigner V, Mondain M.
Role of the ENT specialist in the diagnosis
of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea-hypop-
nea syndrome (POSAHS). Part 3: sleep re-
cordings. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head
Neck Dis 2020;137(5):405-410. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2020.02.001.
8. Zhou J, Wu Z, Xu H, Gao L, Wang C,
Zheng F, Yao Y. Nano-Carbon-Based
application of parecoxib sodium combi-
ned with hydromorphone in preventing
anesthesia hyperalgesia caused by remi-
fentanil after thyroidectomy. Cell Mol
Biol 2022;3:68(1-8). https://doi.org/10.
14715/cmb/2022.68.3.24.
9. Zeng YM, Hu AK, Su HZ, Ko CY. A review of
the association between oral bacterial flora
and obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syn-
drome comorbid with cardiovascular disea-
se. Sleep Breath 2020;24(4):1261-1266.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-019-
01962-9.
10. Xie Z, Chai M, Gu W, Yuan H. Changes
in fractional exhaled nitric oxide, exhaled
carbon monoxide and pulmonary function
during the acute attack, treatment and re-
mission phases of pediatric asthma. Transl
Pediatr 2020;9(6):784-794. https://doi.
org/10.21037%2Ftp-20-351.
11. Herath P, Wimalasekera S, Amarasekara
T, Fernando M, Turale S. Effect of cigaret-
te smoking on smoking biomarkers, blood
pressure and blood lipid levels among Sri
Lankan male smokers. Postgrad Med J
108 Jia et al.
Investigación Clínica 65(1): 2024
2022;98(1165):848-854. https://doi.org/
10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-141016.
12. Rizzi M, Radovanovic D, Airoldi A, Cris-
tiano A, Frassanito F, Gaboardi P, Saad
M, Atzeni F, Sarzi-Puttini P, Santus P.
Rationale underlying the measurement
of fractional exhaled nitric oxide in syste-
mic sclerosis patients. Clin Exp Rheuma-
tol 2019;37 Suppl 119(4):125-132. PMID:
30873947.
13. Wang H, Wang X, Fei J, Li F, Han J, Qin
X. MicroRNA-23B inhibits non-small cell
lung cancer proliferation, invasion and
migration via downregulation of RUNX2
and inhibition of Wnt/Β-catenin sig-
naling pathway. J Biol Regul Homeost
Agents 2020;34(3):825-835. https://doi.
org/10.23812/20-11-a-34
14. Pan KT, Leonardi GS, Ucci M, Croxford B.
Can exhaled carbon monoxide be used as a
marker of exposure? A cross-sectional stu-
dy in young adults. Int J Environ Res Public
Health 2021;18(22):11893(1-13). https://
doi.org/10.3390%2Fijerph182211893
15. Kis A, Meszaros M, Tarnoki DL, Tarnoki
AD, Lazar Z, Horvath P, Kunos L, Bikov
A. Exhaled carbon monoxide levels in obs-
tructive sleep apnoea. Journal of breath re-
search, (2019).13(3), 036012. https://doi.
org/10.1088/1752-7163/ab231d.
16. Martinez D. Effects of aging on peripheral
chemoreceptor CO2 response during sleep
and wakefulness in healthy men. Respir Phy-
siol Neurobiol 2008 ;162(2):138-43. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2008.05. 009.
17. Chen TY, Kung YY, Lai H C, Lee LA, Jen
IA, Chang HA, Liu CY, Kuo TBJ, Yang
CCH. Prevalence and effects of sleep-disor-
dered breathing on middle-aged patients
with sedative-free generalized anxiety di-
sorder: A prospective case-control study.
Front Psychiatry 2023:13. https://doi.
org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1067437.
18. Fitzgerald D, Laurent M, Funaro M, Harel
A, DeAngelis T, Bangeranye C, Najjar S,
Tabansky I, Stern J. Defining the role of
T lymphocytes in the immunopathogenesis
of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.
Discov Med 2020;29(157):91-102. PMID:
33002405.
19. Wang Y, Qin M, Jin L, Liu S, Fan K, Yu
S. Correlation between exhaled nitric oxi-
de and carbon monoxide and allergic rhi-
nitis. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing
Wai Ke Za Zhi 2020;34(11):1014-1018.
https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.2096-
7993.2020.11.013.
20. Gaalema DE, Yant B, Khadanga S, Sava-
ge PD, Rengo JL, Ades PA. Carbon mo-
noxide monitoring to objectively measure
smoking status in cardiac rehabilitation.
Health Psychol 2022;41(10):733-739.
https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001178.
21. Fan Z, Lu X, Long H, Li T, Zhang Y. The
association of hemocyte profile and obs-
tructive sleep apnea. J Clin Lab Anal
2019;33(2):e22680(1-7). https://doi.org/
10.1002/jcla.22680.
22. Popadic V, Brajkovic M, Klasnja S, Milic
N, Rajovic N, Lisulov DP, Divac A, Ivanko-
vic T, Manojlovic A, Nikolic N, Memon
L, Brankovic M, Popovic M, Sekulic A,
Macut JB, Markovic O, Djurasevic S, Sto-
jkovic M, Todorovic Z, Zdravkovic M. Co-
rrelation of dyslipidemia and inflammation
with obstructive sleep apnea severity. Front
Pharmacol 2022;13:897279(1-8). https://
doi.org/10.3389%2Ffphar.2022.897279.
23. Yi M, Zhao W, Tan Y, Fei Q, Liu K, Chen
Z, Zhang Y. The causal relationships bet-
ween obstructive sleep apnea and elevated
CRP and TNF-α protein levels. Ann Med
2022;54(1):1578-1589. https://doi.org/10
.1080/07853890.2022.2081873.
24. Zhao C, Qin M, Jin L, Lai J, Wang Y, Liu
S, Yu S. Significance of exhaled nitric oxide
and carbon monoxide in auxiliary diagnosis
and evaluation of allergic rhinitis. Media-
tors Inflamm 2022;2022:2083057(1-10).
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2083057.