Instituto de Estudios Políticos y Derecho Público "Dr. Humberto J. La Roche"
de la Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Políticas de la Universidad del Zulia
Maracaibo, Venezuela
Publicación cientíca en formato digital
ISSN-Versión Impresa 0798-1406 / ISSN-Versión on line 2542-3185
Depósito legal pp 197402ZU34
ppi 201502ZU4645
Vol.40 N° 74
2022
ISSN 0798- 1406 ~ De pó si to le gal pp 198502ZU132
Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas
La re vis ta Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas, es una pu bli ca cn aus pi cia da por el Ins ti tu to
de Es tu dios Po lí ti cos y De re cho Pú bli co Dr. Hum ber to J. La Ro che” (IEPDP) de la Fa-
cul tad de Cien cias Ju rí di cas y Po ti cas de la Uni ver si dad del Zu lia.
En tre sus ob je ti vos fi gu ran: con tri buir con el pro gre so cien tí fi co de las Cien cias
Hu ma nas y So cia les, a tra vés de la di vul ga ción de los re sul ta dos lo gra dos por sus in ves-
ti ga do res; es ti mu lar la in ves ti ga ción en es tas áreas del sa ber; y pro pi ciar la pre sen ta-
ción, dis cu sión y con fron ta ción de las ideas y avan ces cien tí fi cos con com pro mi so so cial.
Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas apa re ce dos ve ces al o y pu bli ca tra ba jos ori gi na les con
avan ces o re sul ta dos de in ves ti ga ción en las áreas de Cien cia Po lí ti ca y De re cho Pú bli-
co, los cua les son so me ti dos a la con si de ra ción de ár bi tros ca li fi ca dos.
ESTA PU BLI CA CIÓN APA RE CE RE SE ÑA DA, EN TRE OTROS ÍN DI CES, EN
:
Re vicyhLUZ, In ter na tio nal Po li ti cal Scien ce Abs tracts, Re vis ta In ter ame ri ca na de
Bi blio gra fía, en el Cen tro La ti no ame ri ca no para el De sa rrol lo (CLAD), en Bi blio-
gra fía So cio Eco nó mi ca de Ve ne zue la de RE DIN SE, In ter na tio nal Bi blio graphy of
Po li ti cal Scien ce, Re vencyt, His pa nic Ame ri can Pe rio di cals In dex/HAPI), Ul ri chs
Pe rio di cals Di rec tory, EBS CO. Se en cuen tra acre di ta da al Re gis tro de Pu bli ca cio-
nes Cien tí fi cas y Tec no ló gi cas Ve ne zo la nas del FO NA CIT, La tin dex.
Di rec to ra
L
OIRALITH
M. C
HIRINOS
P
ORTILLO
Co mi Edi tor
Eduviges Morales Villalobos
Fabiola Tavares Duarte
Ma ría Eu ge nia Soto Hernández
Nila Leal González
Carmen Pérez Baralt
Co mi Ase sor
Pedro Bracho Grand
J. M. Del ga do Ocan do
Jo Ce rra da
Ri car do Com bel las
An gel Lom bar di
Die ter Nohlen
Al fre do Ra mos Ji mé nez
Go ran Ther born
Frie drich Welsch
Asis ten tes Ad mi nis tra ti vos
Joan López Urdaneta y Nil da Ma n
Re vis ta Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas. Av. Gua ji ra. Uni ver si dad del Zu lia. Nú cleo Hu ma nís ti co. Fa-
cul tad de Cien cias Ju rí di cas y Po lí ti cas. Ins ti tu to de Es tu dios Po lí ti cos y De re cho Pú bli co
Dr. Hum ber to J. La Ro che. Ma ra cai bo, Ve ne zue la. E- mail: cues tio nes po li ti cas@gmail.
com ~ loi chi ri nos por til lo@gmail.com. Te le fax: 58- 0261- 4127018.
Vol. 40, Nº 74 (2022), 815-829
IEPDP-Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Políticas - LUZ
Recibido el 15/07/22 Aceptado el 25/09/22
Impact of digitalization on the
protection and implementation of the
national economic interests
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4074.45
Liudmyla Pankova *
Dmytro Uzbek **
Yevhen Panchenko ***
Alla Samoilenko ****
Irina Privarnikova *****
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to study the impact of
digitization on the economic system, as well as the protection
and implementation of national economic interests. To achieve
this goal, scientic and special methods such as analysis and
synthesis were used; this methodology also allowed to understand
the essence and distinguish the approaches to the concept of digitization,
generalization and systematization, which made it possible to clarify the
main objectives of digitization, its benets and risks. The challenges and
opportunities of digitization are identied, as well as the main problems
hindering its development in the context of protection and realization of
economic interests in Ukraine. It is noted that the solution of these problems
will lead to signicant momentum in the development of digitization. It is
concluded that, among the main benets of digitization is the generation
of Internet platforms for the transmission of cutting-edge information and
knowledge.
Keywords: digitalization; digital transformation; digital development;
national economic system; national economic interests.
* Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Management and
Business Administration, Cherkasy State Technological University, 460, Shevchenko av., 18006,
Cherkasy, Ukraine. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2953-608X
** Postgraduate Student of the Department of Management and Business Administration, Cherkasy State
Technological University, 460, Shevchenko av., 18006, Cherkasy, Ukraine. ORCID ID: https://orcid.
org/0000-0002-3906-0284
*** Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of International Management,
Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, 54/2, Prospect Peremogy, 03057,
Kyiv, Ukraine. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8650-8029
**** PhD in Economics, Doctoral Student of the Department of International Management, Kyiv National
Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, 54/1 Prospect Peremogy, 03057, Kyiv, Ukraine.
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9696-985X
***** PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Assistant Professor of the Department of Marketing and
International Management, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, 72, Gagarin Avenue, 49005,
Dnipro, Ukraine. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7022-7946
816 Liudmyla Pankova, Dmytro Uzbek, Yevhen Panchenko, Alla Samoilenko y Irina Privarnikova
Impact of digitalization on the protection and implementation of the national economic interests
La inuencia de la digitalización en la protección y
realización de los intereses económicos nacionales
Resumen
El propósito de este artículo es estudiar el impacto de la digitalización
en el sistema económico, así como la protección e implementación
de los intereses económicos nacionales. Para lograr este objetivo, se
utilizaron métodos cientícos y especiales como el análisis y la síntesis;
esta metodología permitió además comprender la esencia y distinguir los
enfoques del concepto de digitalización, generalización y sistematización,
lo que permitió aclarar los principales objetivos de la digitalización, sus
benecios y riesgos. Se identican los desafíos y oportunidades de la
digitalización, así como los principales problemas que obstaculizan su
desarrollo en el contexto de la protección y realización de los intereses
económicos en Ucrania. Se observa que la solución de estos problemas
conducirá a un impulso signicativo en el desarrollo de la digitalización.
Se concluye que, entre los principales benecios de la digitalización se
encuentra la generación de plataformas de Internet para la transmisión de
información y conocimientos de vanguardia.
Palabras clave: digitalización; transformación digital; desarrollo digital;
sistema económico nacional; intereses económicos
nacionales.
Introduction
At the current socio-economic stage of development of countries there is
a rapid and powerful spread of digitalization processes, which are massive
and inuential and do not bypass any area of activity. Thus, within such
a situation, the competitiveness and eciency of the national economic
system has a stable dependence on the ability to generate and successfully
implement digital innovations and technologies in all its components.
Today, digitalization is the most relevant aspect of modern economic
functioning of countries and their development, is seen as a leading
mechanism and tool for achieving future successful and eective results
at all levels: from global and national, to regional and individual. Due to
digitalization, signicant transformations are taking place today, which are
manifested in the ability to analyze and forecast the activities of various
economic systems, optimize management processes and operations, save
resources and more.
Thus, despite the lack of stability in the world, there is a permanent
increase in demand for digital services against the background of increasing
817
CUESTIONES POLÍTICAS
Vol. 40 Nº 74 (2022): 815-829
costs for the development and implementation of various digital innovations
and technologies, as well as lower prices for mobile communications and
rapid Internet access, which is inevitable will lead to further growth in
popularity and development of digital technologies.
Activation of the process of application of digital innovations in such
conditions provides processing of large amounts of information, which are
constantly increasing and contribute to more ecient use of resources. The
growth of the investment component of digital development leads to the
rapid spread of digital technologies in our country, in the areas of articial
intelligence, robotics, mobile communications and the Internet, etc. The
above situation leads to an understanding of the need to study the nature
and directions of the impact of digitalization on the national economic
system, the protection and realization of its interests.
1. Literature Review
In modern economic conditions there is a total digitalization of economic
activity of subjects. Digitization is one of the leading modern trends, dating
back to 1997 (Gilster, 1997). The digitalization of the economy as an integral
part of modern society is the object of study in the works: Cosmulese et
al. (2019), Djakona et al. (2020), Dubyna et al. (2022), Garafonova et al.
(2021), Grosu et al. (2021), Kholiavko et al. (2021); Kholiavko et al. (2022);
Shaposhnykova et al. (2021).
Digitization can be considered in broad and narrow meanings.
Digitization in a broad sense is the process of implementing digital
technologies and transmission systems at the level of telecommunications
networks, switching and control facilities that provide transmission and
distribution of information ows in digital form (Lagodiienko et al. (2021),
Liutikov et al. (2021), Popelo et al. (2021)). Digitization in the narrow sense
is the process of transition from analog to digital presentation (Reis et al.,
2018; Sebastian et al., 2017).
An example of such a narrow (technical) interpretation of digitalization
can be the transition from analog television to digital television, the
transition from conventional mobile phones to smartphones.
The process of digitalization is gradually demonstrating the transition
from the industrial to the post-industrial era of society (from “Industry
3.0” to “Industry 4.0”), which in modern economics and legislation digital
economy, cannot but aect national economic interests Shaposhnykova et
al. (2021), Shkarlet et al. (2019), Zhuk et al. (2019), Yakushko et al. (2021).
The genesis of the digital economy in world economic theory goes back
to the report of the American professor J. Stiglitz at the Davos Economic
818
Liudmyla Pankova, Dmytro Uzbek, Yevhen Panchenko, Alla Samoilenko y Irina Privarnikova
Impact of digitalization on the protection and implementation of the national economic interests
Forum in 2015: they raised the question of whether there should be an
individual for the economic system or “the economy should be for the
individual” (Zybareva et al., 2021: 16).
In the rst case, the individual is actually a functional unit that serves
the economy, and estimates of its development are fair to use indicators
such as GDP, investment in xed assets, unemployment and more. In the
second case, the point is that the economy is given the role of a superservice
or marketplace, with which the individual builds an interaction based on
personal interests and preferences. To assess the economy as a marketplace
requires completely dierent indicators: investment in digital technologies,
the level of development of digital infrastructure, public access to the
Internet, etc.
Analysis of the scientic literature makes it possible to understand that
the digital economy is perceived as a certain ideal system in which a large
number of entities and institutions are almost completely digitized, and
the whole value chain is based on the principles of smart manufacturing
(Djakona et al. (2021), Dubyna et al. (2022), Irtyshcheva et al. (2021),
Kholiavko et al. (2021).
In domestic practice, in contrast to global trends, the development of
the digital economy has a fairly pronounced administrative character from
top to bottom (Samoilovych et al., 2021; Tulchynska et al., 2022; Abramova
et al., 2021).
At the same time, in foreign practice, the initiative and development of
the methodology of digitalization of the national economy lie on the side
of business - because it is he who needs to comfortably pursue private
commercial interests, and customers - to receive products and services
in a new format (Grosu et al., 2021), (Reis et al., 2018), (Vidruska, 2016).
The digital economy in the methodological plane is closely connected
with articial intelligence and machine communications (robots) as a
fundamental component of the construction of the “Industry 4.0” system.
In the domestic scientic literature, researchers Shkarlet et al. (2019),
Zhuk et al. (2019), Yakushko et al. (2021) emphasize the state’s eorts to
develop digital infrastructure to scale digitalization processes in the market
space.
Today, the processes of digitalization are gaining signicant development
and are gradually penetrating all sectors of the economy and public life. In
general, the vast majority of domestic studies by Abramova et al. (2021),
Gonta et al. (2016), Grigoraș-Ichim et al. (2018), Kozak et al. (2022), Popelo
(2017) focuses on the fact that Ukrainian society is actively preparing for
the transition to a new socio-economic system. From the standpoint of
domestic economists - the country must soon move to a new technological
way, resulting in a global change in socio-economic formation, namely: the
819
CUESTIONES POLÍTICAS
Vol. 40 Nº 74 (2022): 815-829
transition from a market model of economic development to forecasting,
based on big data analysis, cognitive technologies for demand forecasting
and planning oers. The key gures of the new technological device will be
the developers of digital platforms that will satisfy the economic interests
of all participants.
Socio-economic development of the country takes place in a conict
of interests of dierent groups and the search for compromises, so it is
necessary to understand the structure of interests Kosach et al. (2022),
Okano-Heijmans (2013), Zhavoronok et al. (2022). National economic
interests are one of the central guidelines for the development of economies
in all countries. Adoption of legislative acts, implementation of socio-
economic reforms, support of certain sectors of the economy, decisions
on accession to international economic organizations, association within
integration groups - all this must be done in accordance with national
economic interests.
The current trend of the digital economy is characterized by the
formation of a new paradigm of scientic and technological development, is
a consequence of penetration into all spheres of life of articial intelligence
and IT. A signicant factor in the transition to a new socio-economic
system is the large-scale digitalization of the economy, aecting public
and multiple private economic interests of dierent groups, forming new
economic interests (Frieden, 2017; Grabowski, 2000; Hryshchenko, 2009;
Jung, 2016).
To manage the processes of modernization, it is necessary that the
content of new economic interests be adequate to the objective needs
associated with the progress of society as a whole, and that these interests
are expressed in eective motivations. Coherence of economic interests,
their balance is the main content of economic life of society.
Today, science does not have a single opinion about the concepts,
structure and hierarchy of transforming economic interests and ways to
reconcile them in the context of digitalization.
Issues of the impact of digitalization on the functioning and development
of the economic system of the state and the protection of its interests are
becoming increasingly important. Understanding this scientic position
determined the topic and purpose of this study.
The purpose of this article is to study the impact of digitalization on the
national economic system, as well as the protection and implementation of
its national economic interests.
To achieve this goal in this study used such general and special
methods as analysis and synthesis (to understand the essence and
distinguish approaches to the concept of “digitization”), generalization and
820
Liudmyla Pankova, Dmytro Uzbek, Yevhen Panchenko, Alla Samoilenko y Irina Privarnikova
Impact of digitalization on the protection and implementation of the national economic interests
systematization (to clarify the main objectives of digitalization, its benets
and risks), graphic (for a clear picture of approaches to understanding the
category of “digitalization”, challenges, opportunities and main problems
of digitalization in the context of protection and realization of national
economic interests).
2. Results
Acceleration of scientic and technological progress leads to the
emergence and rapid spread of new information technologies in society - the
so-called digitalization of society. The economic systems of many countries
are in search of eective ways to use the achievements of digitalization of
society for economic growth. The basis for the development of the digital
economy has been created for several decades. Today, the widespread use
and use of information technology and the Internet has led to the formation
of information technology paradigm of society.
Today, many countries around the world are trying to restructure their
economies on a digital platform. The main task of any state is to improve the
quality of life of society. Thanks to global informatization, it is possible to
simplify and mechanize the functionality and many processes in all spheres
of life. Modern digital technologies are strategically important because they
allow to bring the management of the state, economy and development of
territories to a completely new technological level. Digital transformation
is one of the national goals of the country’s development and should
contribute to the breakthrough development of the country, improving the
living standards of the population, taking into account national economic
interests.
The current stage of development is characterized by increasing the
impact of global problems and security issues, and thus ensuring the
eective functioning of national economic systems, as well as the protection
and implementation of its national economic interests becomes extremely
important. Currently, the leading role among the structural components
of national economic systems is played by such as creative, innovative,
technological, digital, the successful combination of which contributes to
the success of business processes and activities.
Today, the leading aspects of the development of countries are
technological, which provide new opportunities and identify new directions
in this area, which makes them relevant for modern research. Achieving the
goal of the study should begin, in our opinion, with the study of the essence
of the concept of digitization and approaches to understanding it, for which
we consider the views on this issue of leading researchers and information
from scientic sources, the results are shown in Fig. 1.
821
CUESTIONES POLÍTICAS
Vol. 40 Nº 74 (2022): 815-829
Fig. 1. Approaches to understanding the category of “digitalization Source:
generated by the authors
Thus, according to the information on Fig. 1, we come to the
understanding that there is no single denition of this denition today, and
dierent scholars interpret it dierently. In general, digitalization, in our
opinion, should be understood as a process of signicant transformations
within various spheres of economic activity through the use of ICT, the
implementation of the mechanism of which provides eciency, protability
and success.
For the national economic systems of all countries of the world, the
formation and implementation of the mechanism of digital transformation,
the use of digitalization tools is now an urgent task that will help increase
the competitiveness of states and gain new competitive advantages.
The study of priority goals and objectives of digitalization (Fig. 2) and
its impact on the activities of the national economic system, protection
and realization of its interests is now relevant. It is important to study and
understand the essence of this category, as well as the challenges, risks and
problems that hinder these processes, and the opportunities and benets
that can be gained from them.
822
Liudmyla Pankova, Dmytro Uzbek, Yevhen Panchenko, Alla Samoilenko y Irina Privarnikova
Impact of digitalization on the protection and implementation of the national economic interests
Fig. 2. The main objectives of digitalization and their impact on the activities of
the national economic system. Source: generated by the authors
Thus, the main reason for the digitalization of national economic
systems should be considered globalization. It is necessary to identify the
characteristics of domestic processes of digital transformation through
their goals. According to Fig. 2, the main objectives of digitalization should
include the following:
transformation of economic activities into ecient, successful and
competitive;
increase in economic growth and investment activity;
digital updating of industrial systems and their operational activities,
creation and introduction of high-tech industries;
use of available human potential;
formation, formation and development of digital entrepreneurship;
involving the population in digital technologies and processes,
expanding access to them and using their opportunities and benets.
823
CUESTIONES POLÍTICAS
Vol. 40 Nº 74 (2022): 815-829
As a result, those activities of the economic system that use digital
technologies are developing faster at a lower cost and with a higher level
of quality. Many of them, such as education and health, transport system,
etc., are updated through the involvement of digitalization processes,
increase their success, protability, competitiveness, move to a new, higher
level of signicance, value and quality, which cannot but positively aect
development national economic system and society.
In the process of formation of domestic digitalization, issues related
to digital transformation, which should be understood as the process of
introduction of digital technologies in the situation of digital economy to
improve and renew the individual, business, society and the country as a
whole, need further study and dissemination.
With this in mind, it is necessary to explore such aspects of digitalization
as the challenges and opportunities that accompany its formation and
development, as well as the main problems that hinder the transformation
of the domestic economic system into digital (Fig. 3). Solving the identied
problems will lead to the eective implementation of digitalization.
Fig. 3. Challenges, opportunities and main problems of digitalization in the
context of protection and implementation of the national economic interests.
Source: generated by the authors based on Ukraine 2030E is a country with
a developed digital economy. URL: https://strategy.uifuture.org/kraina-z-
rozvinutoyucifrovoyuekonomikoyu.html#summary.
824
Liudmyla Pankova, Dmytro Uzbek, Yevhen Panchenko, Alla Samoilenko y Irina Privarnikova
Impact of digitalization on the protection and implementation of the national economic interests
In this article, in our opinion, it is necessary to pay attention to the study
of the benets and risks of digitalization, and with this in mind, to clarify the
main directions of its impact on the protection and realization of national
economic interests (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4. Advantages, risks and impact of digitalization on the protection and
implementation of the national economic interests. Source: generated by the
authors based on Digital Agenda of Ukraine - 2020.
Based on the study of scientic sources, the advantages of digitalization
were: the possibility of using articial intelligence and its further rapid
development, the emergence of innovative approaches to management
and its methods, the formation of Internet platforms to generate and
share information, knowledge and more. However, it should be noted the
possibility of negative aspects of digitalization, so among the risks of its
development, which signicantly aect the protection and realization of
national economic interests, should be noted: violation of privacy, which
is unacceptable for a democratic society, threat to national security and
digital independence.
825
CUESTIONES POLÍTICAS
Vol. 40 Nº 74 (2022): 815-829
Conclusion
This study claried the essential aspects of the concept of “digitalization”
and the main approaches to understanding it. As a result, it is concluded that
there is no consensus on the interpretation of this denition and its author’s
understanding is presented, according to which digitalization is a process
of signicant transformations within various spheres of economic activity
through the use of ICT. The main goals of digitalization are highlighted
and characterized, and the direction of their impact on the activities of the
national economic system are claried.
The main problems that hinder the development of digitalization, it is
found that overcoming them will help increase the eciency and success
of this process. The advantages and risks of digitalization for the country’s
economy and society are presented. Thus, the main benets of digitalization
include the generation of Internet platforms for the transmission of
information, knowledge, etc., the spread of articial intelligence, the
formation of innovative directions for the implementation of management
processes; the main risks are an increase in the level of threat to the privacy
of the life aspects of the country’s population, the national security of the
state and its digital independence. Based on them, the directions and nature
of the impact of digitalization on the protection and realization of national
economic interests are determined.
Bibliographic References
ABRAMOVA, Alla; FILYPPOVA, Svitlana; VDOVENKO, Nataliia;
KOTELEVETS, Dmytro; LOZYCHENKO, Oleksandr; MALIN,
Oleksandr. 2021. “Regulatory policy transformation in conditions of non-
stationary economy in eastern european countries: practical approach”
In: International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security.
Vol. 21, No. 10, pp. 39-48.
COSMULESE, Cristina Gabriela; GROSU, Veronica; HLACIUC, Elena;
ZHAVORONOK, Artur. 2019. “The Inuences of the Digital Revolution
on the Educational System of the EU Countries” In: Marketing and
Management of Innovations. Vol. 3, pp. 242-254.
DJAKONA, Antonina; KHOLIAVKO, Nataliia; DUBYNA, Maksym;
ZHAVORONOK, Artur, FEDYSHYN, Maiia. 2021. “Educational
dominant of the information economy development: a case of Latvia for
Ukraine” In: Economic Annals-XXI. Vol. 192, No. 2, pp. 108-124.
826 Liudmyla Pankova, Dmytro Uzbek, Yevhen Panchenko, Alla Samoilenko y Irina Privarnikova
Impact of digitalization on the protection and implementation of the national economic interests
DJAKONA, Antonina; KHOLIAVKO, Nataliia; DUBYNA, Maksym;
ZHAVORONOK, Artur; LAVROV, Ruslan. 2020. “The higher education
adaptability to the digital economy” In: Bulletin of the National Academy
of sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Vol. 4, No. 386, pp. 294-306.
DUBYNA, Maksym; KHOLIAVKO, Nataliia; ZHAVORONOK, Artur;
SAFONOV, Yuriy; KRYLOV, Denys; TOCHYLINA, Yuliia. 2022. “The
ICT sector in economic development of the countries of Eastern Europe:
a comparative analysis” In: WSEAS Transactions on Business and
Economics. Vol. 19, pp. 169-185.
FRIEDEN, Jery. 2017. “Invested interests: The politics of national economic
policies in a world of global nance” In: International Political Economy.
pp. 541-567.
GARAFONOVA, Olga; POPELO, Olha; TULCHYNSKA, Svitlana; DERHALIUK,
Marta; BEREZOVSKYI, Danylo. 2021. “Functions of public management
of the regional development in the conditions of digital transformation of
economy” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 10, No. 43, pp. 49-58.
GILSTER, Paul. 1997. Digital literacy. Wiley Computer Publications. New York,
USA.
GONTA, Olena; SHKARLET, Serhiy; DUBYNA, Maksym. 2016. “Peculiarities of
system approach use to cognition of economic phenomena” In: Scientic
bulletin of Polissia. Vol. 4, No. 8, pp. 9-17.
GRABOWSKI, Richard. 2000. “The State and the Pursuit of the National
Economic Interest” In: Canadian Journal of Development Studies. Vol.
21, No. 2, pp. 269-293.
GRABOWSKI, Richard. 2002. “Constructing National Economic Interests” In:
Journal of the Asia Pacic Economy. Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 310-334.
GRIGORAȘ-ICHIM, Claudia Elena; COSMULESE, Cristina Gabriela;
SAVCHUK, Dmytro; ZHAVORONOK, Artur. 2018. “Shaping the
perception and vision of economic operators from the Romania –
Ukraine Moldova border area on interim nancial reporting” In:
Economic Annals-XXI. Vol. 173, No. 9-10, pp. 60-67.
GROSU, Veronica; KHOLIAVKO, Nataliia; ZHAVORONOK, Artur; ZLATI,
Monica Laura; COSMULESE, Cristina Gabriela. 2021. “Conceptualization
of model of nancial management in romanian agriculture” In: Economic
Annals-XXI. Vol. 191, No. 7-8 (1), pp. 54-66.
HRYSHCHENKO, Arnold. 2009. “Conditions for Ukraine’s national economic
interests’ realization within wto regulatory system” In: Actual Problems
of Economics. Vol. 9, pp. 19-26.
827
CUESTIONES POLÍTICAS
Vol. 40 Nº 74 (2022): 815-829
IRTYSHCHEVA, Inna; STEHNEI, Marianna; POPADYNETS, Nazariy;
BOGATYREV, Konstantin; BOIKO, Yevheniia; KRAMARENKO, Iryna;
SENKEVICH, Oleksandr; HRYSHYNA, Nataliya; KOZAK, Ivanna;
ISHCHENKO, Olena. 2021. “The eect of digital technology development
on economic growth” In: International Journal of Data and Network
Science. Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 25-36.
JUNG, Heon Joo; JEONG, Han Wool. 2016. “South Korean Attitude towards
China: Threat Perception, Economic Interest, and National Identity” In:
African and Asian Studies. Vol. 15, No. 2-3, pp. 242-264.
KHOLIAVKO, Nataliia; POPELO, Olha; MELNYCHENKO, Anatolii;
DERHALIUK, Marta; GRYNEVYCH, Liudmyla. 2022. “The Role of
Higher Education in the Digital Economy Development” In: Revista
Tempos E Espaços Em Educação Vol. 15, No. 34, e16773.
KHOLIAVKO, Nataliia; POPELO, Olha; TULCHYNSKA, Svitlana. 2021.
“Priority Directions of Increasing the Adaptivity of Universities to the
Conditions of the Digital Economy” In: Revista Tempos E Espaços Em
Educação. Vol. 14, No. 33, e16383.
KOSACH, Irina; SHAPOSHNYKOV, Kostiantyn; CHUB, Anton; YAKUSHKO,
Inna; KOTELEVETS, Dmytro; LOZYCHENKO, Oleksandr. 2022.
“Regulatory policy in the context of eective public governance: evidence
of Eastern European Countries” In: Cuestiones Políticas. Vol. 40, No. 72,
pp. 456-473.
KOZAK, Kateryna; PANKOVA, Liudmyla; FINAGINA, Olesya; MARYCH,
Maksym; BULYUK, Vitaliy; RYBALKO; Serhiy. 2022. “Strategic
Management of the Socio-Economic Development of Macro Systems
of Public and Regional Levels” In: International Journal of Computer
Science and Network Security. Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 471-478.
LAGODIIENKO, Nataliia; YAKUSHKO, Inna. 2021. “Digital Innovations in
Taxation: Bibliometric Analysis” In: Marketing and Management of
Innovations. Vol. 3, pp. 66-77.
LIUTIKOV, Pavlo; ABRAMOVA, Alla; SHAPOSHNYKOV, Kostiantyn;
ZHAVORONOK, Artur; SKVIRSKYI, Illia; LUKASHEV, Oleksandr.
2021. “Ecosystem of VAT Administration in E-Commerce: Case of the
Eastern Europe Countries” In: Estudios de economía aplicada. Vol. 39,
No. 5, pp. 77-93.
OKANO-HEIJMANS, Maaike. 2013. “Economic diplomacy: Japan and the
balance of national interests” In: Diplomatic Studies. Vol. 9, pp. 200–
229.
828
Liudmyla Pankova, Dmytro Uzbek, Yevhen Panchenko, Alla Samoilenko y Irina Privarnikova
Impact of digitalization on the protection and implementation of the national economic interests
POPELO, Olha. 2017. “Methodological approaches to modernization processes
of the productive forces in the conditions of Eurointegration” In:
Scientic Bulletin of Polissia. Vol. 1, No. 9, pp. 218-224.
POPELO, Olha; KYCHKO, Iryna; TULCHYNSKA, Svitlana; ZHYGALKEVYCH,
Zhanna; TREITIAK, Olha. 2021. “The Impact of Digitalization on the
Forms Change of Employment and the Labor Market in the Context of
the Information Economy Development” In: International Journal of
Computer Science and Network Security. Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 160-167.
REIS, João; AMORIM, Marlene; MELÃO, Nuno; MATOS, Patrícia. 2018.
“Digital Transformation: A Literature Review and Guidelines for
Future Research” In: Trends and Advances in Information Systems and
Technologies. Vol. 745, pp. 15-28.
SAMOILOVYCH, Anastasiia; GARAFONOVA, Olga; POPELO, Olha;
MARHASOVA, Viktoriya; LAZARENKO, Yuliia. 2021. “World experience
and ukrainian realities of digital transformation of regions in the context
of the information economy development” In: Financial and credit
activity: problems of theory and practice. Vol. 3, No. 38, pp. 316-325.
SEBASTIAN, ina; ROSS, Jeanne; BEATH, Cynthia; MOCKER, Martin;
MOLONEY, Kate; FONSTAD, Nils. 2017. How Big Old Companies
Navigate Digital Transformation. MIS Q. Executive, 16.
SHAPOSHNYKOV, Kostiantyn; KOCHUBEI, Oleksandr; GRYGOR, Oleg;
PROTSENKO, Nataliia; VYSHNEVSKA, Oksana; DZYUBINA, Andriy.
2021. “Organizational and Economic Mechanism of Development and
Promotion of IT Products in Ukraine” In: Estudios de economía aplicada.
Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 236-240.
SHAPOSHNYKOVA, Iryna; KHOLIAVKO, Nataliia; POPELO, Olha;
BAZHENKOV, Ievgen; SHEREMET, Oleh. 2021. “Information and
communication technologies as a tool of strategy for ensuring the higher
education adaptation to the digital economy challenge” In: International
Journal of Computer Science and Network Security. Vol. 21, No. 8, pp.
187-195.
SHKARLET, Serhiy; KHOLIAVKO, Nataliia; DUBYNA, Maksym. 2019.
“Information Economy: Management of Educational, Innovation, and
Research Determinants” In: Marketing and Management of Innovations.
Vol. 3, pp. 126-141.
TULCHYNSKA, Svitlana; POPELO, Olha; REVKO, Alona; BUTKO, Mykola;
DERHALIUK, Marta. 2022. “Methodological Approaches to the
Evaluation of Innovation in Polish and Ukrainian Regions, Taking into
829
CUESTIONES POLÍTICAS
Vol. 40 Nº 74 (2022): 815-829
Account Digitalization” In: Comparative Economic Research. Central
and Eastern Europe. Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 55-74.
VIDRUSKA, Renāte. 2016. “The Digital Economy & Society Index and Network
Readiness Index: Performance of Latvia on European Union Arena” In:
New Challenges Of Economic And Business Development 2016. pp.
901-916.
YAKUSHKO, Іnna; LAGODIIENKO, Nataliia. 2021. “Development of the
Taxation System in the Conditions of Digital Transformation of the
National Economy” In: Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory
and Practice. Vol. 5, No. 40, pp. 378–388.
ZHAVORONOK, Artur; CHUB, Anton; YAKUSHKO, Іnna; KOTELEVETS,
Dmytro; LOZYCHENKO, Oleksandr; KUPCHYSHYNА, Olga. 2022.
“Regulatory Policy: Bibliometric Analysis Using the VOSviewer Program”
In: International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security.
Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 39-48.
ZHUK, Olena; SHKARLET, Serhiy; KHOLIAVKO, Nataliia; DUBYNA,
Maksym. 2019. “Innovation, Educational, Research Components of
The Evaluation of Information Economy Development (As Exemplied
by Eastern Partnership Countries)” In: Marketing and Management of
Innovations. Vol. 1, pp. 70-83.
ZYBAREVA, Oksana; KRAVCHUK, Iryna; PUSHAK, Yaroslav; VERBIVSKA,
Liudmyla; MAKEIEVA, Olena. 2021. “Economic and Legal Aspects of
the Network Readiness of the Enterprises in Ukraine in the Context of
Business Improving” In: Estudios de economía aplicada. Vol. 39, No. 5,
pp. 52-63.
www.luz.edu.ve
www.serbi.luz.edu.ve
www.produccioncienticaluz.org
Esta revista fue editada en formato digital y publicada
en octubre de 2022, por el Fondo Editorial Serbiluz,
Universidad del Zulia. Maracaibo-Venezuela
Vol.40 Nº 74