ISSN 0798- 1406 ~ De pó si to le gal pp 198502ZU132
Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas
La re vis ta Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas, es una pu bli ca cn aus pi cia da por el Ins ti tu to
de Es tu dios Po lí ti cos y De re cho Pú bli co Dr. Hum ber to J. La Ro che” (IEPDP) de la Fa-
cul tad de Cien cias Ju rí di cas y Po ti cas de la Uni ver si dad del Zu lia.
En tre sus ob je ti vos fi gu ran: con tri buir con el pro gre so cien tí fi co de las Cien cias
Hu ma nas y So cia les, a tra vés de la di vul ga ción de los re sul ta dos lo gra dos por sus in ves-
ti ga do res; es ti mu lar la in ves ti ga ción en es tas áreas del sa ber; y pro pi ciar la pre sen ta-
ción, dis cu sión y con fron ta ción de las ideas y avan ces cien tí fi cos con com pro mi so so cial.
Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas apa re ce dos ve ces al o y pu bli ca tra ba jos ori gi na les con
avan ces o re sul ta dos de in ves ti ga ción en las áreas de Cien cia Po lí ti ca y De re cho Pú bli-
co, los cua les son so me ti dos a la con si de ra ción de ár bi tros ca li fi ca dos.
ESTA PU BLI CA CIÓN APA RE CE RE SE ÑA DA, EN TRE OTROS ÍN DI CES, EN
:
Re vicyhLUZ, In ter na tio nal Po li ti cal Scien ce Abs tracts, Re vis ta In ter ame ri ca na de
Bi blio gra fía, en el Cen tro La ti no ame ri ca no para el De sa rrol lo (CLAD), en Bi blio-
gra fía So cio Eco nó mi ca de Ve ne zue la de RE DIN SE, In ter na tio nal Bi blio graphy of
Po li ti cal Scien ce, Re vencyt, His pa nic Ame ri can Pe rio di cals In dex/HAPI), Ul ri chs
Pe rio di cals Di rec tory, EBS CO. Se en cuen tra acre di ta da al Re gis tro de Pu bli ca cio-
nes Cien tí fi cas y Tec no ló gi cas Ve ne zo la nas del FO NA CIT, La tin dex.
Di rec to ra
L
OIRALITH
M. C
HIRINOS
P
ORTILLO
Co mi Edi tor
Eduviges Morales Villalobos
Fabiola Tavares Duarte
Ma ría Eu ge nia Soto Hernández
Nila Leal González
Carmen Pérez Baralt
Co mi Ase sor
Pedro Bracho Grand
J. M. Del ga do Ocan do
Jo Ce rra da
Ri car do Com bel las
An gel Lom bar di
Die ter Nohlen
Al fre do Ra mos Ji mé nez
Go ran Ther born
Frie drich Welsch
Asis ten tes Ad mi nis tra ti vos
Joan López Urdaneta y Nil da Ma n
Re vis ta Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas. Av. Gua ji ra. Uni ver si dad del Zu lia. Nú cleo Hu ma nís ti co. Fa-
cul tad de Cien cias Ju rí di cas y Po lí ti cas. Ins ti tu to de Es tu dios Po lí ti cos y De re cho Pú bli co
Dr. Hum ber to J. La Ro che. Ma ra cai bo, Ve ne zue la. E- mail: cues tio nes po li ti cas@gmail.
com ~ loi chi ri nos por til lo@gmail.com. Te le fax: 58- 0261- 4127018.
Vol. 40, Nº 72 (2022), 716-728
IEPDP-Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Políticas - LUZ
Recibido el 09/09/2021 Aceptado el 28/12/2021
Comparative analysis of the prevention
of the laundering of the proceeds of crime
in dierent countries
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4072.42
Nadezda Vasilievna Sedova *
Darya Mikhailovna Melnikova **
Ludmila Sergeevna Marien ***
Darina Alexandrovna Sizova ****
Abstract
The objective of the research was to analyze the ght against
the laundering of money obtained by criminal means as one of
the priorities of the socio-economic development of all countries
with advanced economies. This is particularly important in the
period of the ght against COVID-19, when countries faced global
economic decline, growing budget decits, and the need to nd
mechanisms to stimulate economic growth under conditions
of a large number of restrictions imposed by coronavirus infection. The
authors used the methods of analysis of scientic documents, laws and legal
norms. As a result, a comparative analysis of the main elements of anti-
money laundering systems in dierent countries was carried out and, in
addition, the characteristics of the construction of AML/CFT systems at the
international level are indicated. It is concluded that, as a rule, government
authorities start from the understanding that banks know their customers
and understand their operations better than the nancial intelligence
agency and the supervisory authority. Therefore, they also believe that
it is necessary to send the nancial intelligence agency already «leaked»
information about suspicious transactions, which will probably be used by
law enforcement authorities.
Keyword: anti-money laundering law; control threshold; criminal
proceeds; nancial intelligence; global nancial sector.
* Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russia. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-
0002-5670-2437
** Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russia. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-
0002-2770-8282
*** Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russia. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-
0001-5695-8080
**** State Corporation «Rostec», Moscow, Russia; Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow,
Russia. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7729-7234
717
CUESTIONES POLÍTICAS
Vol. 40 Nº 72 (2022): 716-728
Análisis comparativo de la prevención del
blanqueo de dinero en diferentes países
Resumen
El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar la lucha contra el lavado de
dinero obtenido por medios delictivos como una de las prioridades del
desarrollo socioeconómico de todos los países con economías avanzadas.
Esto es particularmente importante en el período de la lucha contra el
COVID-19, cuando los países enfrentaron un declive económico global,
décits presupuestarios crecientes y la necesidad de encontrar mecanismos
para estimular el crecimiento económico en condiciones de un gran
número de restricciones impuestas por la infección por coronavirus. Los
autores utilizaron los métodos de análisis de documentos cientícos, leyes
y normas jurídicas. Como resultados, se efectuó un análisis comparativo
de los principales elementos de los sistemas contra el lavado de dinero en
diferentes países y, ademas, se indican las características de la construcción
de sistemas ALD/CFT a nivel internacional. Se concluye que, por regla
general, las autoridades gubernamentales parten del entendimiento de
que los bancos conocen a sus clientes y entienden sus operaciones mejor
que la agencia de inteligencia nanciera y la autoridad supervisora. Por lo
tanto, también creen que es necesario enviar a la agencia de inteligencia
nanciera información ya «ltrada» sobre transacciones sospechosas, que
probablemente sera utilizada por las autoridades policiales.
Palabra clave: lucha contra el blanqueo de capitales; umbral de
control; producto delictivo; inteligencia nanciera;
sector nanciero global.
Introduction
In the last quarter of the twentieth century, under the inuence of the
rapid development of information, nancial and transport technologies, the
world became global. The global economy is dominated by multinational
corporations, which equaled the economic power and political inuence of
nation-states. Rapidly developing technological advances have oered new
forms of communication that have opened up additional opportunities for
organized crime. As a result, conditions have developed that are extremely
favorable for the growth of the criminal economy, which has also become
global in scale, structure of relations and spheres of activity.
The analysis of the structure of the modern economic system allows
us to clearly reveal the economic content of the concept of” money
laundering”. The essence of money laundering is that the money acquired
718
Nadezda Vasilievna Sedova, Darya Mikhailovna Melnikova, Ludmila Sergeevna Marien y
Darina Alexandrovna Sizova
Comparative analysis of the prevention of the laundering of the proceeds of crime in dierent countries
illegally is appeared as receives in the eyes of the state and society a form
that completely or largely hides their origin. In practice, after laundering
“dirty” money becomes indistinguishable from legally obtained money.
The legalization of criminal proceeds is a complex process involving many
dierent operations performed by a variety of methods that are constantly
being improved. Despite the huge variety of mechanisms and schemes of
legalization, they are based on almost one technology.
1. Research and methodology
In the Russian Federation, the subject of legalization (laundering) of
proceeds from crime is money or other property, the illegal acquisition of
which is a sign of a specic crime (for example, theft, taking a bribe), as well
as money or other property received as a material reward for a crime (for
example, for murder for hire) or as payment for the sale of items restricted
in civil circulation.
There are dierences in national AML/CFT systems and methods due
to dierent initial states of economies and the role of shadow components
in them. Given these dierences, the approaches to the ght against ML/
FT various foreign countries can be classied into the following groups
(Alifanova, Evlakhova, 2015; Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist
nancing measures, 2019; Voznyakovskaya, 2012):
1) The Countries to which legal norms in the ght against ML/TF was
formed largely under the inuence of international law (member
countries of the European Union and the member States of the
Council of Europe).
2) Countries whose legal norms in the eld of combating ML/FT were
formed for the most part within the national legal framework without
signicant inuence of international law (the United States, Canada
and other countries of the American continent). Such a feature of the
US legislation is due to the fact that in this country the legislation
on combating organized crime and, accordingly, on laundering the
proceeds from criminal activities was created in the early 70s of the
last century, when the international legal framework in the eld of
countering these types of criminal activities was not yet at the level of
the United Nations, or at the regional, in particular European, level
(Money Laundering and Tax Evasion, 2017; National assessment
of the risks of legalization (laundering) of criminal proceeds, 2018;
Money laundering, 2018).
3) Asian countries have strong and competent law enforcement agencies,
but the transparency of their nancial systems is insucient to judge
the extent of money laundering.
719
CUESTIONES POLÍTICAS
Vol. 40 Nº 72 (2022): 716-728
4) Countries whose legal norms in the eld of combating ML/FT have
not yet been formed, but are only in their infancy (these are a number
of States in Africa and Latin America). In most countries in these
regions, no measures have been taken against ML/FT. For example,
in Africa, there are relatively few countries that have ratied the
Vienna Convention and adopted special measures against money
laundering, which may simply mean that there is no money laundering
problem on the same scale as in other regions (Solongo, 2001; Anti-
money laundering and counter-terrorist nancing measures, 2019;
Schneider, 2010).
It should be noted that the legal norms of control in the banking and
nancial sphere are of particular importance at the present time, since it is
a platform where the most of this type of crime occurs. Increased attention
in the legislation of various countries is aimed to the control of ML/FT at
the stage of their placement in nancial institutions. Research shows that
this phase of the legalization of criminal proceeds is the most vulnerable to
state control. The eectiveness of any ML/FT control model depends on the
extent to which it ensures nancial transparency of the activities of nancial
and non-nancial sector institutions for authorized government bodies.
2. Results and Discussion
Table 1 provides a detailed analysis of the main elements of the national
AML/CFT systems of the countries that received a high FAFT rating as
part of the preparation of the mutual assessment report. Here are some
distinctive features of the organization of foreign AML/CFT systems.
720
Nadezda Vasilievna Sedova, Darya Mikhailovna Melnikova, Ludmila Sergeevna Marien y
Darina Alexandrovna Sizova
Comparative analysis of the prevention of the laundering of the proceeds of crime in dierent countries
Table 1. Analysis of the main elements of national
AML/CFT systems*
Country Year
of
adop-
tion
of the
law
Special legislation Finan-
cial
Intelli-
gence
Unit
(FIU)
Control
thresh-
olds
Re-
sponsi-
ble for
inform-
ing the
FIU
Special
software
systems
for an-
alytical
work
Criminal
liability
for mon-
ey laun-
dering
Russia 2001 Federal Law of
07.08.2001 No.
115-FZ; Art. 174 and
174.1 of the Criminal
Code of the Russian
Federation;
-special regulatory
legal acts of the Bank
of Russia
Federal
Service
for Fi-
nancial
Moni-
toring
(Rosn-
moni-
toring)
600,000
rubles,
about
8,000
USD
Respon-
sible
employ-
ees of
nancial
interme-
diaries
Infor-
mation
Resources
of Rosn-
monitor-
ing and
the Bank
of Russia
Low
enough
(from a
monetary
ne to
impris-
onment
up to 7
years)
The USA 1970 - Bank Secrecy Act
(BSA), 1970;
- Money Laundering
Control Act, 1986;
- Comprehensive
Money Laundering
Act, 1986;
- Anti-Drug Abuse
Act,1988;
- Crime Central Act.
Par. 2532, 1990;
- Housing and Com-
munity Development
Act, 1992
- Presidential Deci-
sion Directive (PDD)
№ 42, 1995;
- Foreign Account
Tax Compliance Act
(FATCA), 2013
FinCEN 10 000
USD
Respon-
sible
employ-
ees of
nancial
interme-
diaries
CBQS
Curren-
cy and
Banking
Inquiry
System
Very high
(impris-
onment
up to life
imprison-
ment)
Great
Britain
1986 - Money Laundering
Control Law , 1896;
-
Terrorism Act
2000;
-
Anti-terrorism,
Crime and Security
Act, 2001;
-
Proceeds of Crime
Act, 2002;
-
Serious Organised
Crime and Police
Act, 2005;
- Money Laundering
Regulations, 2007
- Criminal Finances
Act 2017
National
Crim-
inal
Intelli-
gence
Service
(NCIS)
10 000
EUR
Money
laun-
dering
reporting
ocer,
MLRO
Informa-
tion and
analytical
center
NCIS
High
(impris-
onment
for up to
14 years,
including
inspectors
(MLRO),
not
who
reported
a dubious
operation)
Italy 1991
-
Law No. 646 “On
the ght against the
maa”, 1982;
-
Law No. 55 “
On the activity of
nancial and credit
institutions of the
country”, 1990;
UIC 10 000
EUR
Respon-
sible
employ-
ees of
nancial
interme-
diaries
GIANOS
system
High
(impris-
onment
for up to
12 years
or more,
as well
as large
monetary
ne)
* compiled by the authors
721
CUESTIONES POLÍTICAS
Vol. 40 Nº 72 (2022): 716-728
USA. FinCEN currently has the world’s largest data bank by volume
of information and the most advanced data management system, which
includes software based on articial intelligence methodology. AI/MPP
(MPP - Massive Parallel Processing) technology allows monitoring of the
entire American electronic banking process in real time. The AI/MRP
articial intelligence system automatically scans more than 70 major
American databases, combining fragmentary information about the object
under study. It is able to detect illogical / atypical nancial transactions
for further study by specialists (Alstadster et al., 2017; Leandro, Schneider,
2018). FinCEN works with the U.S. Treasury Department to develop AML/
CFT programs, and specic verication programs for individual foreign
accounts.
According to foreign experts, FinCEN is the largest of all existing
databases, capable of processing and analyzing huge amounts of
information in the short term. It should be noted that since January 1,
2013, the US law “On Taxation of Foreign Accounts” (Foreign Account
Tax Compliance Act, FATCA) has entered into force, according to which
nancial organizations of all countries must conclude a special agreement
with the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on monitoring the availability
of accounts of American taxpayers and from January 1, 2014, transmit
information about them to the IRS. At the same time, if the nancial
institution does not have such an agreement, 30% will be forcibly withheld
from the amounts of money transfers originating in the United States; from
the proceeds received from the sale of American assets (for example, shares
or bonds), regardless of whether a prot or loss was obtained as a result of
the transaction; from all transfers to organizations that have not entered
into this agreement. Moreover, the IRS also undertakes to provide relevant
information to the tax authorities of these countries.
The compliance of nancial institutions with the requirements of US
AML/CFT legislation is regulated by Regulation 31 CFR 103.1215 and
section 326 of the US PATRIOT6 Act, according to which each nancial
institution is required to perform a customer identication program
(hereinafter referred to as PIK) in accordance with the size and nature of its
activities, including certain minimum requirements. It should also provide
for reasonable and practical risk-based procedures to verify the identity
5 The Client Identication Programs Statement was developed jointly by the US Treasury Department,
FinCEN, the Oce of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Savings Oversight Oce and the National
Credit Union Administration, and has been applied in practice since 10/01/2003.
6 USA PATRIOT Act, a law passed by the US Congress and signed by President George W. Bush on
10/26/2001 (after the 9/11/2001 terrorist attack). Thanks to this law, the powers of the special
services in the eld of anti-terrorist activities were signicantly expanded. The law also extends to the
nancial sector, expanding the powers of the competent authorities to carry out regulatory activities
and supervise nancial transactions, especially those that are carried out by foreign private and legal
entities.
722
Nadezda Vasilievna Sedova, Darya Mikhailovna Melnikova, Ludmila Sergeevna Marien y
Darina Alexandrovna Sizova
Comparative analysis of the prevention of the laundering of the proceeds of crime in dierent countries
of each client. These procedures should enable the nancial institution to
reasonably believe that it knows the true identity of each client.
Based on the analysis of documents and established banking practices
of AML/CFT adopted in the United States, we conclude that the success
of any nancial investigation requires the principle of “follow money”
(“follow money”), together with a thorough review of many documents on
transactions, including using information from a bank account, research
via the Internet, reports on credit transactions, taxpayer taxes, nancial
reports (balance sheet, income statement, etc.), suspicious transactions or
activities (SAR), as well as analytical reports FBAR, CTR. We believe that in
order to develop AML/CFT mechanisms in Russia, attention should be paid
to these facts (Haruk, 2010; National assessment of the risks of legalization
(laundering) of criminal proceeds, 2018).
The experience of European countries is also interesting for Russian
practice. In European countries, the system of monitoring and informing
about banking operations and transactions is built dierently, depending
on the specics of a particular country.
The United Kingdom became the rst European country to ratify
the Council of Europe Convention on laundering, search, seizure and
conscation of the proceeds of crime in 1990.
In 1992, the National Criminal Intelligence Service (NCIS) is established
in the UK, which is responsible for collecting, storing, estimating and
analyzing information about serious crimes, including those related to
ML/FT. This activity allows to create data banks on almost all aspects of
crime. The Service receives information about suspicious transactions
from authorized state bodies (this duty is assigned to AML/CFT inspectors
(money laundering reporting ocer)). An employee of a nancial
institution is obliged to inform the competent authorities about the
transaction performed by the client, if this employee suspects that the
client’s transaction is aimed at ML/FT, or the amount for it exceeds the
established threshold value.
The Oce of Strategic and Special Intelligence NCIS is located in
London and is a think tank that studies various aspects of high-risk
crimes. The Department collects, researches and analyzes information on
economic crimes. Reports on the work in the form of dossiers, memoranda
and qualied opinions are submitted by this oce to the British law
enforcement and other authorities. The reports contain information on
trends and trends in the development of crime. This NCIS unit is also
engaged in tactical intelligence against criminals and criminal groups.
The nancial Investigation Departments of the police forces of the UK
counties, based on the materials of the NCIS, carry out operational checks
of persons suspected of possessing or disposing of criminal proceeds. If
723
CUESTIONES POLÍTICAS
Vol. 40 Nº 72 (2022): 716-728
it is necessary to obtain information about the accounts of the client of
a nancial and credit institution, the local police ocers are required to
apply to the court for a production order, on the basis of which the nancial
and credit institution has the right to provide the police with information
about the movement of the client’s funds. For example, if individuals have
information or assumptions that the money is illegal income from the
commission of a crime, and they do not report this to the relevant competent
authorities, they can be prosecuted with imprisonment for up to ve years.
Thus, we can conclude that the system is under/The UK CFT has a three-
level structure, where the central place is occupied by the state body, which
is responsible for nancial monitoring of data received from the primary
AML/CFT subsystem (inspectors of nancial institutions on allegations of
money laundering), as well as conducting their preliminary analysis with
further transmission of information to law enforcement agencies and courts
in the UK. At the same time, the main feature of such an AML/CFT system
is the presence in the FIU body of a database of suspicious transactions
with the possibility of access to it by police agencies, which undoubtedly
increases the eectiveness of interaction between supervisory and law
enforcement agencies.
In order to improve the eectiveness of the interaction of Russian state
bodies in the eld of AML/CFT, attention should be paid to these facts.
In Italy, the ght against nancial crimes was launched earlier than in
many other European countries.
In 1982, the Law No. 646 “On combating the Maa” was adopted, which
allowed the verication of bank accounts of persons suspected of involvement
in criminal groups, and the investigation of real estate transactions made
by them. The Italian law enforcement authorities have the right to study
the lifestyle, nancial situation, sources of income of citizens suspected of
belonging to criminal syndicates, and members of their families (wives,
children), as well as individuals and legal entities whose property and funds
the suspects may directly or indirectly dispose of.
In addition, in Italy, persons involved in the legalization (laundering) of
income and property obtained by criminal means can be imprisoned for a
period of 7 to 12 years and subject to a large monetary ne. For ocials who
use their ocial position, the period of punishment for the same criminal
acts may be extended. Law No. 197, adopted in 1991, introduced a control
system that includes:
Prohibition of circulation of bearer securities.
Mandatory indication of the beneciary when performing a large-
amount transaction;
Limit the maximum amount of funds in bearer accounts to 20
million liras (from 01.03.2003-10 000 EUR).
724
Nadezda Vasilievna Sedova, Darya Mikhailovna Melnikova, Ludmila Sergeevna Marien y
Darina Alexandrovna Sizova
Comparative analysis of the prevention of the laundering of the proceeds of crime in dierent countries
The role of the nancial intelligence agency, which receives
information about suspicious transactions, is performed by a special
body of the Bank of Italy-UIC (Ucio Italiano dei Cambi), which
has the following functions::
Statistical accounting and operational analysis of the Italian balance
of payments.
Management of foreign exchange reserves.
Preventing and combating the legalization (laundering) of criminal
proceeds, through nancial analysis and intelligence.
The UIC operates in close cooperation with the Financial Guard units. The
Financial Guard is a security agency that carries out special investigations
of suspicious nancial transactions detected by the UIC. The main purpose
of the guard units is to identify the sources of income and determine the
composition of the property of the accused and suspects. When the facts of
violation of the law are established in the course of a special investigation,
the information is brought to the Chief Prosecutor, who decides to initiate
a criminal investigation.
Thus, it should be noted that within the framework of the Italian AML/
CFT system, the Financial Guard carries out operational and investigative
activities, while the functions of the Italian FIU-UIC consist exclusively
in information and analytical support. In addition, the competence of the
Financial Guard includes smuggling and organized crime in the nancial
sphere.
Summarizing the above, it is necessary to note that, despite many
international recommendations, there are no common approaches to
the organization of work in the eld of AML/CFT in banking institutions
in dierent countries. Each country has its own characteristics of the
organization of this work. However, there are also general principles of this
work. Almost all developed foreign countries have adopted AML/CFT laws,
established nancial intelligence units, developed special programs, and set
thresholds for monitoring. Special tools have been developed that banks use
to manage ML/FT risks: indicators for identifying suspicious transactions,
setting transaction thresholds, having special reports and databases,
developing special programs and software, as well as a corporate strategy
for AML/CFT purposes (Johnson, 2019; Summary rating for assessing the
eectiveness…, 2020; Voznyakovskaya, 2012).
The Russian AML/CFT system diers from most foreign AML/CFT
systems, primarily by the increased level of detail of the rules and procedures
described in laws and regulations, and the relatively strict regulation of the
activities of credit institutions under AML/FT.
725
CUESTIONES POLÍTICAS
Vol. 40 Nº 72 (2022): 716-728
In addition, Russian credit institutions have a fairly passive role in the
AML/CFT system. In essence, this role is limited to the registration, storage
and transmission of information about transactions subject to mandatory
control. In turn, the burden of conducting nancial investigations in Russia
largely lies not on the banks themselves, but on the Bank of Russia and
Rosnmonitoring, which acts as a “lter” for processing and analyzing
information, standing between the banking system and law enforcement
agencies.
At the same time, in most foreign AML/CFT systems, the nancial
intelligence unit receives information that has already been substantially
processed (“ltered”) in the banks themselves, which are engaged in
nancial investigations. The information presented below allows us to
assess how carefully foreign banks “dose” information sent to nancial
intelligence units in comparison with Russian banks (Table 2). The data
in table 2 should be understood taking into account the scale of banking
systems.
Table 2. Number of reports submitted by banks from dierent
countries to nancial intelligence agencies*
Country Number of messages per year, million
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Russia 6 7,5 8,9 9,5 10,2 12,7 22,2 30 33,8 29,3
The USA 2,1 1,7 1,9 2,7 1,6 1,97 1,8 1,9 2 2,2
Great
Britain
0,24 0,32 0,41 0,279 0,316 0,354 0,381 0,418 0,441 0,478
Italy 0,021 0,0373 0,049 0,067 0,064 0,072 0,082 0,101 0,094 0,098
* compiled by the authors
Conclusion
In the foreign countries the government authorities proceed from the
understanding that banks know their customers and understand their
operations better than the nancial intelligence agency and the supervisory
authority. Therefore, they believe that it is necessary to send to the nancial
intelligence agency already “ltered” information about suspicious
transactions, which is highly likely to be used by law enforcement and
supervisory authorities.
726
Nadezda Vasilievna Sedova, Darya Mikhailovna Melnikova, Ludmila Sergeevna Marien y
Darina Alexandrovna Sizova
Comparative analysis of the prevention of the laundering of the proceeds of crime in dierent countries
There are strong arguments that national AML/CFT systems based
on the principle of granting banks broad rights and powers in the eld of
AML/CFT, based on the priority of the substantive side of work over the
formal side, are the most advanced and eective (if we use the traditional
understanding of eciency as the ratio of results and the cost of resources
to achieve them).
The conducted research and comparison of national AML/CFT systems
makes it clear that the focus should be shifted to the internal control of
banks.
First, such AML/CFT systems increase the eectiveness of the work of
state bodies in identifying illegal, socially dangerous activities as a result
of monitoring banking operations and, accordingly, suppressing these
activities.
Secondly, advanced AML/CFT systems help to reduce the costs and
expenses across the economy for carrying out work in the eld of AML
/ CFT by achieving the fullest possible alignment and harmony of the
interests of the banking sector with the interests of the state. The emphasis
is placed on the fact that banks independently and in their own interests
build an internal control system aimed at managing the risks associated
with customer service.
Thus, the experience of the United States and European countries can
be used in solving the issue of developing mechanisms to counteract the
legalization of illegal income in the banking system in Russia. At the same
time, it should be understood that an insuciently thought-out and hasty
copying of even the most advanced foreign experience, without a preliminary
assessment of the readiness of national authorities and business circles to
accept these changes, can lead not to an increase in the eectiveness of the
AML/CFT system, but, on the contrary, to negative results. In addition, it
should be noted that an important step towards the eective functioning
of any AML/CFT system is to understand the economic content of the
process of legalization (laundering) of illegal income, its manifestations
and consequences.
Bibliographic References
ALIFANOVA, Elena Nikolaevan, EVLAKHOVA, Yulia Sergeevna. 2015.
Identication of threats to the growth of systemic risk in the Russian
nancial market on the basis of determining the vulnerabilities of
nancial institutions and households to the risk of money laundering:
monograph. RSEU (RINH). Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
727
CUESTIONES POLÍTICAS
Vol. 40 Nº 72 (2022): 716-728
ALSTADSTER, Annete, JOHANNESEN, Niels, ZUCMAN, Gabriel. 2017. Who
Owns the Wealth in Tax Havens? Macro Evidence and Implications for
Global Inequality. Available online. In: https://gabriel-zucman.eu/les/
AJZ2017b.pdf. Date of consultation: 08/17/2021.
ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND COUNTER-TERRORIST FINANCING
MEASURES. 2019. Fourth Round Mutual Evaluation Report, FATF.
Russian Federation. Date of consultation: 08/17/2021
HARUK, Andrey Leonidovich. 2010. “Foreign experience of countering
the legalization of money acquired by criminal means” In: Russian
Investigator. Vol. 24, No. 48. pp. 33-37.
JOHNSON, Scott. 2019. Capital Flight From Russia Carries $750 Billion
Price Tag. Bloomberg Economics. Available online. In: https://www.
bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-03-12/capital-ight-from-russia-
carries-750-billion-price-tag-chart. Date of consultation: 07/17/2021.
LAW NO. 55. 1990. On the activity of nancial and credit institutions of the
country. Available online. In: http://www.consultant.ru/document/
cons_doc_LAW_5842/. Date of consultation: 07/17/2021.
LEANDRO, Medina, SCHNEIDER, Friedrich. 2018. “Shadow Economies
Around the World: What Did We Learn Over the Last 20 Years?”. In:
IMF WORKING PAPERS, pp. 61-73. Available online. In: https://
www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2018/01/25/Shadow-
Economies-Around-the-World-What-Did-We-Learn-Over-the-Last-20-
Years-45583. Date of consultation: 08/06/2021.
MONEY LAUNDERING AND TAX EVASION. 2017. Unger Brigitte. Utrecht
University. Utrecht, Netherlands. Available online. In: http://coers.
eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/D6.2-Working-Paper.pdf. Date of
consultation: 07/06/2021.
MONEY LAUNDERING. 2018. Data United nations oce on drugs and crime.
Money laundering. Available online. In: https://dataunodc.un.org/ru/
node/1641. Date of consultation: 07/06/2021.
NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THE RISKS OF LEGALIZATION
(LAUNDERING) OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDS. 2018. Public report.
Rosnmonitoring. Available online. In: http://www.fedsfm.ru/. Date of
consultation: 07/06/2021
SCHNEIDER, Friedrich. 2010. “Money Laundering and Financial Means of
Organized Crime: Some Preliminary Empirical Findings” In: Economics
of Security Working Paper. Vol. 26, pp. 19-48.
728
Nadezda Vasilievna Sedova, Darya Mikhailovna Melnikova, Ludmila Sergeevna Marien y
Darina Alexandrovna Sizova
Comparative analysis of the prevention of the laundering of the proceeds of crime in dierent countries
SOLONGO, Dolgor. 2001. Russian capitalism and money-laundering. United
Nations. New York, USA.
SUMMARY RATING FOR ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS AND
TECHNICAL COMPLIANCE OF COUNTRIES WITH THE FATF
RECOMMENDATIONS. April 16, 2020. Available online. In: http://
www.fatf-ga.org/media/fatf/documents/4th-Round-Ratings.pdf. Date
of consultation: 07/16/2021.
VOZNYAKOVSKAYA, K.A. 2012. “Economic and legal norms of de-shadowing
the economy as a means of preventing the legalization of criminal
proceeds” In: Actual problems of public law. Vol. 10, pp. 3-14.
www.luz.edu.ve
www.serbi.luz.edu.ve
www.produccioncienticaluz.org
Esta revista fue editada en formato digital y publicada
en enero de 2022, por el Fondo Editorial Serbiluz,
Universidad del Zulia. Maracaibo-Venezuela
Vol.40 Nº 72