' d='M628.9 40.3l311.3-.5' class='g1'/%3E%0A%3Cpath d='M407.8 243.4h17M55 298.4H72m64.6 73.3h13.3m8.6 0h13.3m122.8 55h12.6m7 0h12.6M321.7 500h16.9M122.5 536.7h12.6m7 0h12.6m276 91.7h26M224.1 646.7h26M175.5 830h20.9m7 0h16.5m6.9 0h20.9M709.9 247.6h12.6m7 0h12.6M661.9 459.3h16.9m-200.5 247h25.2m260.4 18.4h25.2M560 761.3h25.3M528.9 798h25.2m-50.2 55h25.2m42.4 73.3h17m-48.8 154.5h16.9' class='g2'/%3E%0A%3C/svg%3E)
2 of 6
Structural and Microbial Responses of sardines torepeated freeze-thaw cycles/Megaache et al.
INTRODUCTION
Seafood is a crucial aspect of a healthy diet, serving as a
source of quality protein, essential amino acids, and long-chain
polyunsaturated fatty acids. The Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) is
recognized for their nutritional qualities and play an important
economic role in fisheries in Algeria. However, their flesh is highly
perishable, and handling after harvest has a significant effect on
product quality and the microbiological safety of seafood [1].
Freezing is a very effective storage method because it
decreases the rate of the enzymatic activity and microbial growth
[2]. However, in the distribution and retail stages, the fluctuations
in storage temperature frequently cause commercial fishes to go
through multiple freeze–thaw (F–T) cycles that can drastically
change the microstructure and functional properties of muscle
(fish) tissue [3, 4]. Recrystallization of ice causes mechanical
rupture of cell membranes, widening of the inter-fiber spaces,
and loss of intracellular water leading to texture deterioration
and changes in water-holding capacity [5, 6].
In addition to changes in structural integrity, freezing and
thawing cycles also impact microbial die-off and survival rates.
Although the formation of ice crystals and osmotic stress can
render bacterial cells inactive or destroyed [7], thawing can allow
for some potential recovery or growth depending on handling
conditions [8, 9].
Notably, most of the past research has explored the
documented physicochemical properties - such as pH or color -
of small pelagic fish, with many studies not looking at histological
and microbiological parameters simultaneously after multiple F–
T cycles. Recent studies have examined Sardinella aurita [10]
and Oncorhynchus mykiss [11], revealing the need to establish
integrative perspectives that connect tissue integrity with
microbiological behaviour within fluctuating thermal conditions.
Histological examination gives direct evidence of muscle
tissue integrity and its degradation from ice crystals, while
microbiological examination determines and counts the hygienic
safety level of the packaged end-product. Collectively both
perspectives give a rounded viewpoint of freeze stress and its
effect on fish quality and safety (one health perspective) with
food quality and consideration for public health and sustainability
to the environment [12, 13, 14].
The present study aimed to evaluate the histological and
food safety changes in Sardina pilchardus muscle subjected
to repeated freeze–thaw cycles. The study hypothesized that
repeated F–T cycles would degrade muscle structure without
promoting bacterial growth under controlled cold-chain
conditions. By relating tissue damage to bacterial load, the study
provides new insights into structural degradation and microbial
stability in a commonly consumed small pelagic fish.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fresh sardines were sourced from a coastal market in Jijel,
Algeria, and transported to the Laboratory of Histology and
Microbiology, University of Batna 1, under refrigerated conditions
Sampling
Microbiological analysis
Microbial enumeration
Histological and histomorphometric analysis
(CRF–NT64GF40, Condor, Algeria) (0–4 °C) within 6 h of capture.
Thirty fish of comparable size (mean weight = 28.2 g, measured
with an analytical balance KERN, Germany; length = 14.3 cm)
were randomly allocated into 6 groups (n = 5 per treatment).
The control group (T0) consisted of fresh, unfrozen samples,
while groups T1 to T5 underwent one to five F–T cycles. Each
cycle consisted of four days (d) at −20 °C, followed by thawing
over 12 h at 4 °C (CRF–NT64GF40, Condor, Algeria). The protocol
was adapted from previous protocols [4, 5].
Composite muscle samples were created for each treatment
(T0–T3) by pooling the muscle of 2–3 sardines of similar size
and weight to obtain approximately 25 g per sample, which
is necessary for microbiological analysis to ensure sufficient
material. Each composite sample of 25 g was aseptically
homogenized in 225 mL of Buffered Peptone Water (HiMedia,
India) using a BagMixer® (Interscience, France), and the
homogenates were incubated (Memmert INE 400, Germany) at
37 °C for 18 h for enrichment [8].
This approach minimizes individual variability and provides
a representative estimate of the microbial load for each
treatment. However, it does not allow evaluation of variability
between individual fish, which is a limitation of this method.
Microbiological analyses were restricted to T0–T3 because
bacterial counts dropped to very low levels beyond the third
freeze–thaw cycle, making accurate quantification unreliable.
Microbiological assays were performed according to ISO
standards:
•Aerobic mesophilic bacteria: ISO 4833-1:2013 (30 °C, 72 h)
[15].
•Total coliforms: ISO 4832:2006 (37 °C, 24 h) [16].
•Staphylococcus aureus (coagulase-positive): ISO 6888-2:2021
(37 °C, 48 h) [17].
•Salmonella spp.: ISO 6579-1:2017 (enrichment and selective
plating) [18].
Results were expressed as log₁₀ CFU/g. The limit of 7 log₁₀
CFU/g was used as the spoilage threshold for fresh and frozen
fish [19].
Microbial enumeration was limited to T0–T3 because
bacterial counts became extremely low beyond the third
cycle, making reliable quantification impossible, as previously
recommended [8].
Dorsal muscle samples from each treatment (T0–T5) were
fixed in 10 % neutral buffered formalin for 48 h, dehydrated,
cleared, and embedded in paraffin. Sections of 5 µm thickness
were cut using a rotary microtome (Leica, Jung-histocut, 820).
and stained with hematoxylin–eosin following established
protocols [8].
Microscopic observations were made using a light microscope
(Zeiss Axioskop 20, Zeiss, Germany) at 100× magnification.