Ruminant Atresia Ani: Diagnosis and Repair of Rectovaginal Fistulas / Yener et al.__________________________________________________
2 of 8
INTRODUCTION
Congenital anomalies involving the rectum and anus in the
gastrointestinal tract are common in all animal species, with an
approximate incidence of 4.3% [1]. Genetic and environmental factors
are thought to be effective in the etiology of congenital anomalies,
but the exact causes are unknown [1, 2].
Atresia ani (AA) is a congenital anomaly of the rectum and anus
characterized by the inability to pass feces due to the closure of
the anal canal (anus) [3]. In the etiology of AA, teratogens found in
plants and viral diseases during pregnancy have been reported for
cattle, while it has been reported to be the result of an autosomal
recessive gene for sheep [4, 5]. Clinical signs in affected animals
include progressive abdominal distension, tenesmus and prominence
of the anal/perineal region [6]. AA is divided into four classes in all
animals: Type I AA is a congenital stenosis of the anus. In type II
AA, the membrane of the anus persists and the rectum ends as a
blind pouch just cranial to the anus without a hole. In type III, the
anus is closed and the blind end of the rectum is more cranial. In
type IV atresia ani, the anus and terminal rectum develop normally,
but the cranial rectum ends as a blind pouch in the pelvic canal
[7]. Surgical correction is the most indicated treatment for this
disease and therapeutic success has been reported to depend on
the degree of rectal development [6]. Given the importance of this
disease in ruminant species, low therapeutic success has been
reported [3, 6, 8]. AA can be associated with congenital diseases
such as rectovaginal fistula (RVF), rectocystic fistula, vagino–
urethral agenesis, taillessness, hypospadias and diphallus [8]. These
congenital anomalies of the external genital organs are of special
importance due to their repercussions on future generations [5].
RVF is another congenital problem in female ruminants that causes
a direct connection between the rectum and vagina and is responsible
for urofecal mixing, and if the vulva is formed, it serves as a common
opening for both the digestive and urogenital tracts [5, 9]. Studies
have reported that most cases of RVF are associated with type II
AA, and type III AA is encountered in fewer cases [10]. In most of
the affected animals described in the veterinary literature, various
degrees of fecal impaction and colonic distension are evident on
radiographic examination in RVF associated with AA [9]. Common
clinical signs include defecation from the vulva, vulvar irritation,
cystitis most commonly associated with E. coli and Proteus spp. [11].
In the veterinary literature, AA–associated RVF have been reported
in calves (Bos taurus) and lambs (Ovis aries
data, especially radiographic and ultrasonographic evaluations [12].
Anoplasty is the most common surgical procedure performed in RVF
associated with AA. Anoplasty aims to restore anorectal continuity,
preserve the external anal sphincter, restore colonic function and
surgical correction of atresia types I, II and III [6, 11]. When not treated
surgically, animals with atresia ani type II and III have been reported
to have fatal outcomes due to intestinal obstruction [10].
This study aims to contribute to clinician veterinarians by evaluating
AA–related RvF cases observed in calves and sheep.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 17 female ruminants consisting of lambs (n:9) ( 53%) and
calves (n:8) ( 47%) brought to Harran University, Faculty of Veterinary
Medicine, Animal Hospital, Turkey, with the complaint of fecal and
urinary output from the female genital organs due to absence of
the anus region constituted the material of this study. Species,
age, breed, AA–RVF type, treatment and 6 months postoperative
follow–up information were recorded. RVF disease associated with
AA was evaluated with clinical, radiographic and ultrasonographic
examinations and surgical procedure was decided. The data included
in the study were AA type and RVF localization, surgical procedure,
postoperative follow–up, hematology, serum biochemical and blood
gas results, radiographic and ultrasonographic diagnostic imaging
information could not be obtained because the patient owner could
not be reached during the postoperative period were not included
in the study.
This study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee on
Animal Experiments, Harran University (session and permit number:
2024/001/04).
Clinical and laboratory examinations
Within the scope of clinical examinations, body temperature, pulse
rate and respiratory rate were evaluated with Mindray UMEC12VET
(Mindray UMEC12VET, Shenzhen Mindray Bio–Medical Electronics Co,
Shenzhen, China) device before the surgical procedure. Hemogram,
serum biochemistry and blood gas analysis were performed. For
hemogram, white blood cell (WBC), lymphocyte, monocyte, red
blood cell (RBC), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), hematocrit,
mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin
concentration (MCHC) and hemoglobin levels were measured using
a hematology auto analyzer (pocH–100i®, Sysmex, Kobe, Japan).
For biochemical evaluation, serum glucose, creatinine, cholesterol,
alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), total
bilirubin, albumin, C–reactive protein (CRP) levels were determined
using an automated biochemistry analyzer (Spotchem EZ SP 4430®,
Arkray Inc. , Kyoto, Japan). Hydrogen ion concentration (pH), partial
pressure of oxygen (pO
2
) and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO
2
)
analyses of heparinized blood samples were performed with GEM
Premier Plus 3000 (74351, Blood Gas/Electrolyte Analyzer, Model
5700, Instrumentation Laboratories, USA) autoanalyzer.
Radiographic and ultrasonographic evaluation
The initial diagnosis of RVF associated with AA was based on the
results of physical examination and observations of perivulvar fecal
contamination. In addition, considering the presence of feces in
the vulva, a probe or forceps was inserted gently into the vulva and
rectum. Radiographic (838 HF50, Hasvet, China) and ultrasonographic
(Z60 VET, Mindray, China) examinations were performed for detailed
diagnosis. Radiographs were taken in lateral and ventrodorsal positions
including the abdomen and pelvis to determine the degree of colonic
dilatation, caudal width of the rectum and type of AA and to evaluate
any sacrococcygeal anomaly. Radiographs were taken with a Hasvet
838 HF50 70KV – 50mA veterinary por table DR x–ray machine and
digitally evaluated. Ultrasonographic examinations of the anorectal
region were performed similar to the technique described by Kleinübing
et al. [13]. In ultrasonographic examinations, all images were obtained