' d='M611.7 41.6l328.5-.5' class='g1'/%3E%0A%3Cpath d='M320.4 211H333m7 0h8.2m7 0h12.6M252.9 321h17M231.6 467.7h12.6m7 0h8.2m7 0H279m-48.5 55H248m173.6 55h17m-21.1 55h13.3m8.8 0h13.3M157.2 706h12.6m7 0H185m7 0h12.6M55 761H68.4m8.9 0H94.6m8.9 0h17.3m8.9 0H147m8.9 0H178m34.5 73.4h20.8m7 0h20.9m-129.3 165h25.3' class='g2'/%3E%0A%3C/svg%3E)
2 of 9
Levels of PTEs, contamination pathways, and risk assessment in milk/ŞENGÜL and SAKİN.
INTRODUCTION
Cow's (Bos taurus) milk, which has high nutritional value,
probiotic bacteria potential and also contains protein, vitamin
and mineral compounds necessary for growth, immunity and
maintenance of physiological functions, is an important food
source widely consumed all over the world [1, 2, 3].
However, it is also known that cow's milk is the food with the
highest contamination risk due to exposure to toxic non-essential
elements through anthropogenic activities and consumption
of contaminated foods by animals, in addition to containing
essential elements necessary for the maintenance of normal
metabolic functions of the body [4].
Although essential for physiological processes in the
organism, exposure to high concentrations of essential elements
such as copper (Cu), iron (Fe), selenium (Se), and zinc (Zn) in milk
can lead to toxic effects, while dietary exposure to non-essential
potentially toxic elements (PTEs) such as arsenic (As), cadmium
(Cd), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb) even at very low concentrations
can cause serious health problems such as cognitive disorders
and cardiovascular diseases [5, 6, 7].
Additionally, the cumulative nature of these elements in the
food chain and their biological non-degradability make them the
most dangerous pollutants [3]. Determining the levels of these
contaminants is important both in terms of revealing the hygiene
quality of the milk offered for consumption and showing the
pollution level of the region where production is carried out [8].
Since it is known that consumption of contaminated milk can
cause serious health risks, this situation has made it mandatory
to examine the exposure pathways of animals to PTEs [5, 9].
Exposure of lactating cows to high levels of PTEs occurs mainly
through consumption of contaminated feed and drinking water
and inhalation of pollutants released into the air due to increased
industrialization [1, 5, 9].
Industrial activities have been reported to contribute to
PTE contamination in milk produced in developing countries
[9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. Similar situations have been observed in
some regions of rapidly developing industrialized Türkiye, but no
data on the interaction of PTE levels in milk produced in Hatay
province with the intensive industrial activities in this region have
been previously reported [14, 15].
The fact that Hatay is close to international transportation
arteries and markets, that there are ports belonging to public and
private companies operating in the region, and that there are six
organized industrial zones as well as organized industrial zones
where establishment and expansion activities are still ongoing
are important in terms of monitoring and evaluation of cow's
milk produced in the region where industrial activities are carried
out in terms of PTE contamination levels and exposure risk
assessment [16].
The aim of this study was to compare PTE concentrations in
milk samples collected at different lactation stages from cows
raised in industrial and non-industrial areas in Hatay province, to
determine the possible contamination pathways of PTEs into raw
milk and to evaluate the risk of consumption of this milk for the
adult population.
The study location was in industrial and non-industrial
areas of Iskenderun and Antakya of Hatay province, Eastern
Mediterranean region, Türkiye. To collect cow milk, feed, and
drinking water samples, 12 dairy farms used to within 15 km
radial distance from industrial units and 12 dairy farms far to
industrial areas (areas outside of 15 km distance) were selected.
All samples were collected between 2021 and 2022. In
order to collect milk samples, a total of 72 cows were randomly
selected, with three cows chosen from each of the 24 designated
dairy farms. Raw milk samples were collected three times from
each selected cow during the I., II., and III. stages of lactation,
resulting in a total of 216 raw cow milk samples.
Additionally, a total of 72 drinking water samples (each with
a volume of 50 mL, collected directly from the water troughs
into clean polyethylene sampling bottles) and a total of 72 feed
samples (each consisting of 500 g of roughage and concentrated
feed) were collected simultaneously with the collection of milk
samples. All samples were stored in a −20 °C freezer (Bosch,
Germany) until analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study area and sample collection
Milk and feed samples were subjected to acid digestion using
a MARSXpress microwave digestion system (CEM Corporation,
USA) according to the method described in Nordic Committee on
Food Analysis (NMKL) Method 161 [17]. 1 mL of homogenized
milk sample or 0.5 g of feed sample was transferred into
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tubes. Eight mL of concentrated
nitric acid (HNO3, 65 % purity) (Merck, 100456, Germany) and 2
mL of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 35 % purity) (Merck, 108600,
Germany) were added to the samples, and the milk and feed
samples were digested by microwave at a range of settings
(20 min, 800watt power, 200 °C). After microwave digestion,
digested samples were filtered through 25 mm/0.45 μm syringe
filters (Macherey-Nagel, CHROMAFIL Xtra, Germany) to a 50
mL polypropylene tubes (Isolab, Türkiye), and diluted to a final
volume of 25 mL with ultrapure water (Millipore Milli-Q IQ 7000,
France). Afterwards, the diluted samples were stored in a 4 °C
freezer (Bosch, Germany) until analysis.
The potentially toxic elements concentrations in milk and
feed samples were determined using ICP-MS (Analytik Jena AG,
Germany) with an autosampler (ASX-560, Teledyne CETAC, USA)
in accordance with TS EN ISO 21424 [18]. The concentrations
of PTEs in water samples were determined using ICP-MS and
an autosampler according to the method described in USEPA
Method 200.8 [19]. Briefly, water samples were filtered through
25 mm/0.45 μm syringe filters into polypropylene tubes to
achieve a volume of 25 mL. Filtered water samples were mixed
with 1% (v/v) HNO3 prior to ICP-MS analysis.
Microwave digestion of milk and feed samples
Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
analysis